Literature DB >> 22056514

Histomorphological features of the pancreatic remnant as independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: a matched-pairs analysis.

Orlin Belyaev1, Johanna Munding, Torsten Herzog, Dominique Suelberg, Andrea Tannapfel, Wolfgang E Schmidt, Christophe A Mueller, Waldemar Uhl.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major complication after resective pancreatic surgery. This study aimed to identify histomorphological features of the pancreatic remnant as independent determinants for the development of POPF.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients, 3.6% of 696 resections over a period of 5 years, who developed POPF were matched for age, gender, diagnosis, comorbidities, surgeon and procedure with 25 controls without POPF. Pancreatic duct size and index, fibrosis grade, fat content, edema, and signs of chronic and acute inflammation were measured in frozen sections of the resection margin and were then compared.
RESULTS: The POPF rate was 12.2 and 2.6% after distal pancreatectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy, respectively. The POPF group was characterized by a longer ICU and total postoperative stay, higher rate of reoperations and complications. Their pancreata were softer at palpation (88 vs. 56%). Their pancreatic duct was smaller (2.5 vs. 3.2 mm) and their pancreatic fat content higher (16 vs. 8%). High inter- and intralobular fat content, small duct size, low interlobular fibrosis grade and lack of signs of chronic pancreatitis were predictors of POPF development. A score including these parameters identified high-risk patients with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 84%.
CONCLUSION: Histomorphological features of the pancreatic remnant play an independent role as risk factors for the development of POPF. A simple histological score based on the frozen sections may already intraoperatively predict the risk of POPF development.
Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22056514     DOI: 10.1159/000332587

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreatology        ISSN: 1424-3903            Impact factor:   3.996


  18 in total

1.  Sealing with Cyanoacrylate and a Falciform Patch Cannot Prevent Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula.

Authors:  Laura-Christin Tillmann; Torsten Herzog; Waldemar Uhl; Orlin Belyaev
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage--incidence, treatment, and risk factors in over 1,000 pancreatic resections.

Authors:  U F Wellner; B Kulemann; H Lapshyn; J Hoeppner; O Sick; F Makowiec; D Bausch; Ulrich Theodor Hopt; T Keck
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Developing Risk Prediction Models for Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: a Systematic Review of Methodology and Reporting Quality.

Authors:  Zhang Wen; Ya Guo; Banghao Xu; Kaiyin Xiao; Tao Peng; Minhao Peng
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-01-23       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Development and validation of risk prediction nomogram for pancreatic fistula and risk-stratified strategy for drainage management after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Jie Yin; Qicong Zhu; Kai Zhang; Wentao Gao; Junli Wu; Zipeng Lu; Kuirong Jiang; Yi Miao
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2022-01

5.  Pathologic Assessment of Pancreatic Fibrosis for Objective Prediction of Pancreatic Fistula and Management of Prophylactic Drain Removal After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Hidenori Kiyochi; Shouichi Matsukage; Taro Nakamura; Naoki Ishida; Yasutsugu Takada; Shinsuke Kajiwara
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Trans-gastric pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pylorus-preserving robotic Whipple: a proposal for a standardized technique.

Authors:  Pier C Giulianotti; Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia; Sofia Esposito; Mario Masrur; Antonio Gangemi; Francesco M Bianco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Calculating the risk of a pancreatic fistula after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Abigail E Vallance; Alastair L Young; Christian Macutkiewicz; Keith J Roberts; Andrew M Smith
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Comparison of Different Techniques of Pancreatic Stump Management in Robot-Assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Raquel Gonzalez-Heredia; Samarth Durgam; Mario Masrur; Luis Fernando Gonzalez-Ciccarelli; Antonio Gangemi; Francesco M Bianco; Pier C Giulianotti
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2018-08-27

9.  Is primary total pancreatectomy in patients with high-risk pancreatic remnant justified and preferable to pancreaticoduodenectomy? -a matched-pairs analysis of 200 patients.

Authors:  Andreas Minh Luu; Bella Olchanetski; Torsten Herzog; Andrea Tannapfel; Waldemar Uhl; Orlin Belyaev
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-02

Review 10.  Exploring the metabolic syndrome: Nonalcoholic fatty pancreas disease.

Authors:  Roberto Catanzaro; Biagio Cuffari; Angelo Italia; Francesco Marotta
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.