Literature DB >> 12687656

Sample size estimation for GEE method for comparing slopes in repeated measurements data.

Sin-Ho Jung1, Chul Ahn.   

Abstract

Sample size calculation is an important component at the design stage of clinical trials. Controlled clinical trials often use a repeated measurement design in which individuals are randomly assigned to treatment groups and followed-up for measurements at intervals across a treatment period of fixed duration. In studies with repeated measurements, one of the popular primary interests is the comparison of the rates of change in a response variable between groups. Statistical models for calculating sample sizes for repeated measurement designs often fail to take into account the impact of missing data correctly. In this paper we propose to use the generalized estimating equation (GEE) method in comparing the rates of change in repeated measurements and introduce closed form formulae for sample size and power that can be calculated using a scientific calculator. Since the sample size formula is based on asymptotic theory, we investigate the performance of the estimated sample size in practical settings through simulations. Copyright 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12687656     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  22 in total

1.  CONNECT for quality: protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial to improve fall prevention in nursing homes.

Authors:  Ruth A Anderson; Kirsten Corazzini; Kristie Porter; Kathryn Daily; Reuben R McDaniel; Cathleen Colón-Emeric
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 7.327

2.  Rule-of-thumb adjustment of sample sizes to accommodate dropouts in a two-stage analysis of repeated measurements.

Authors:  John E Overall; Scott Tonidandel; Robert R Starbuck
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Once-weekly teriparatide administration for 24 weeks in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  T Kawada
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Effect of Promoting High-Quality Staff Interactions on Fall Prevention in Nursing Homes: A Cluster-Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Kirsten Corazzini; Eleanor S McConnell; Wei Pan; Mark Toles; Rasheeda Hall; Michael P Cary; Melissa Batchelor-Murphy; Tracey Yap; Amber L Anderson; Andrew Burd; Sathya Amarasekara; Ruth A Anderson
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Adding Subjects or Adding Measurements in Repeated Measurement Studies Under Financial Constraints.

Authors:  Song Zhang; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Stat Biopharm Res       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.452

6.  Power and sample size calculations for longitudinal studies estimating a main effect of a time-varying exposure.

Authors:  Xavier Basagaña; Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  Optimal combination of number of participants and number of repeated measurements in longitudinal studies with time-varying exposure.

Authors:  Jose Barrera-Gómez; Donna Spiegelman; Xavier Basagaña
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Power and sample size calculations for evaluating mediation effects in longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Cuiling Wang; Xiaonan Xue
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Effects of correlation and missing data on sample size estimation in longitudinal clinical trials.

Authors:  Song Zhang; Chul Ahn
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.894

10.  Power and sample size calculations for longitudinal studies comparing rates of change with a time-varying exposure.

Authors:  X Basagaña; D Spiegelman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.