Literature DB >> 12177260

Early complications after one hundred and forty-four consecutive hip revisions with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement.

Ewald Ornstein1, Isam Atroshi, Herbert Franzén, Ragnar Johnsson, Per Sandquist, Martin Sundberg.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of impacted morselized allograft bone and cement in hip revision arthroplasty has been popular, but studies that specifically address intraoperative and postoperative complications have been scarce.
METHODS: All complications that occurred during, and within the first year after, 144 consecutive hip revision arthroplasties (108 stems and 130 sockets) performed with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement were recorded. Clinical and radiographic follow-up evaluation was performed at three months and at one year after surgery for all patients except eight (seven who had died of causes unrelated to the hip surgery and one who had sustained a stroke). Of these eight patients, seven had a six-week and/or three-month follow-up evaluation.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine femoral fractures occurred in thirty-seven hips; twenty-nine of the fractures occurred during surgery and ten, within five months after surgery. Of the intraoperative femoral fractures, twelve were proximal, nine were diaphyseal, and eight involved the greater trochanter. Of the postoperative femoral fractures, one was proximal and nine were diaphyseal. Other intraoperative complications were the creation of a femoral cortical window in seven hips and incidental perforation of the femoral cortex in fourteen. Multivariate analysis showed the risk factors for femoral fracture during or after revision to be concomitant disease, greater deficiency of the femoral bone stock, and an intraoperative femoral window or perforation. Other complications included dislocation of the femoral head in nine hips, deep infection in one hip, persistence of preoperative deep infection in one hip, and superficial wound infection requiring wound débridement in two hips.
CONCLUSIONS: We found the complication rate to be high after hip revision arthroplasty performed with impacted morselized allograft bone and cement. The most serious complication was postoperative diaphyseal femoral fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12177260     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200208000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  14 in total

1.  Stability of fused versus nonfused THA femoral impaction grafts.

Authors:  Anneliese D Heiner; John J Callaghan; Thomas D Brown
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Fixation and bone remodeling around a low stiffness stem in revision surgery.

Authors:  Johan Kärrholm; Reza Razaznejad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Prevalence and risk factors for intra-operative periprosthetic fractures in one thousand eight hundred and seventy two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Walter Ricioli; Marcelo Cavalheiro Queiroz; Rodrigo Pereira Guimarães; Emerson K Honda; Giancarlo Polesello; Patricia M de Moraes Barros Fucs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Impaction allograft with cement for the revision of the femoral component. A minimum 39-month follow-up study with the use of the Exeter stem in Asian hips.

Authors:  Soo-Jae Yim; Min-Young Kim; You-Sung Suh
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Chronology of the radiographic appearances of the calcium sulphate-calcium phosphate synthetic bone graft composite following resection of bone tumours--a preliminary study of the normal post-operative appearances.

Authors:  Nikhil A Kotnis; Naveen Parasu; Karen Finlay; Erik Jurriaans; Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Risk factors for revision of hip arthroplasties in patients younger than 30 years.

Authors:  Julien Girard; Christophe Glorion; François Bonnomet; Damien Fron; Henri Migaud
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The threshold force required for femoral impaction grafting in revision hip surgery.

Authors:  Olivia M Flannery; John R Britton; Peter O'Reilly; Nicholas Mahony; Patrick J Prendergast; Paddy J Kenny
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  [Two-stage procedure to exchange septic total hip arthroplasties with late periprosthetic infection. Early results after implantation of a reverse modular hybrid endoprosthesis].

Authors:  G Walter; M Bühler; R Hoffmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Aseptic Loosening.

Authors:  Yuichi Kuroda; Shinya Hayashi; Shingo Hashimoto; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Koji Takayama; Ryosuke Kuroda
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  In vitro testing of femoral impaction grafting with porous titanium particles: a pilot study.

Authors:  René Aquarius; Luc Walschot; Pieter Buma; Berend Willem Schreurs; Nico Verdonschot
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.