Literature DB >> 23836241

Periprosthetic fractures around a cementless hydroxyapatite-coated implant: a new fracture pattern is described.

William N Capello1, James A D'Antonio, Marybeth Naughton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic fractures can occur both intraoperatively and postoperatively with implantation of cementless tapered stems. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In a large cohort of patients receiving cementless, proximally hydroxyapatite-coated femoral implants, we answered the following questions: What was the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative fractures associated with the implant? What were the fracture patterns as classified by the Vancouver classification system? Did the Vancouver classification represent the fracture patterns found? How were the fractures treated and what were the treatment outcomes; that is, how many fractures healed and did the stems osseointegrate?
METHODS: We evaluated 1039 hips (932 patients) from three prospective studies. The hips were divided into three groups: no fractures, intraoperative fractures, and postoperative fractures. Demographic differences among the groups were noted. Postoperative fractures were classified using the Vancouver classification system. We judged stem stability using Engh's criteria and fracture union was determined by the treating surgeon and confirmed by the authors.
RESULTS: We identified 58 periprosthetic fractures in the 1039 hips (5.6%): 38 intraoperative (3.7%) and 20 postoperative (1.9%). Eleven of the postoperative fractures were classifiable by the original Vancouver classification system and nine were of the newly described "clamshell" variety, not classifiable by this system. No intraoperative fractures extended below the lesser trochanter. Twenty-five of these fractures were treated with a single cable or cerclage wire. The remaining received no specific treatment. Of the 20 postoperative fractures, five were treated nonoperatively. All stems osseointegrated.
CONCLUSIONS: Both intraoperative and postoperative fractures can be managed with success when the stem is stabilized or found to be osseointegrated. An adjustment to the Vancouver classification is suggested to include the clamshell fracture, which has not been previously described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23836241      PMCID: PMC3890210          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3137-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  15 in total

1.  Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous-surfaced femoral components.

Authors:  C A Engh; P Massin; K E Suthers
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Fractures of the femur after hip replacement.

Authors:  C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1995

3.  The pseudo A(LT) periprosthetic fracture: it's really a B2.

Authors:  Andrew P Van Houwelingen; Clive P Duncan
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 1.390

4.  The results at nine to twelve years of the use of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem.

Authors:  S A McNally; J A Shepperd; C V Mann; J P Walczak
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-04

5.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register.

Authors:  Hans Lindahl; Henrik Malchau; Peter Herberts; Göran Garellick
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  An algorithm for the surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur around a well-fixed femoral component.

Authors:  K Corten; F Vanrykel; J Bellemans; P Reynders Frederix; J-P Simon; P L O Broos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-11

7.  Cerclage wires or cables for the management of intraoperative fracture associated with a cementless, tapered femoral prosthesis: results at 2 to 16 years.

Authors:  Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi; Thomas H Mallory; Douglas J Chonko; Kathleen L Dodds; Joanne B Adams
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  The uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Intraoperative femoral fractures.

Authors:  R H Fitzgerald; G W Brindley; B F Kavanagh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Risk factors for periprosthetic fractures of the hip: a survivorship analysis.

Authors:  R E Cook; P J Jenkins; P J Walmsley; J T Patton; C M Robinson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Intraoperative femoral fractures associated with cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  T H Mallory; T J Kraus; B K Vaughn
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  19 in total

1.  Outcomes of cerclage wiring to manage intra-operative femoral fracture occurring during cementless hemiarthroplasty in older patients with femoral neck fractures.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Nakarin Saiyudthong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Management of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Matthew P Abdel; Umberto Cottino; Tad M Mabry
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-29       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review.

Authors:  Claudia C Sidler-Maier; James P Waddell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Luca Cavagnaro; Matteo Formica; Marco Basso; Andrea Zanirato; Stefano Divano; Lamberto Felli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2017-07-01

5.  Prevalence and risk factors for intra-operative periprosthetic fractures in one thousand eight hundred and seventy two patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Walter Ricioli; Marcelo Cavalheiro Queiroz; Rodrigo Pereira Guimarães; Emerson K Honda; Giancarlo Polesello; Patricia M de Moraes Barros Fucs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Incidence and pattern of periprosthetic hip fractures around the stem in different stem geometry.

Authors:  Umberto Cottino; Federico Dettoni; Giorgia Caputo; Davide E Bonasia; Paolo Rossi; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Cementless total hip arthroplasty for patients previously treated with femoral osteotomy for hip dysplasia: the incidence of periprosthetic fracture.

Authors:  Masanobu Ohishi; Yasuharu Nakashima; Takuaki Yamamoto; Goro Motomura; Jun-Ichi Fukushi; Satoshi Hamai; Yusuke Kohno; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures--incidence, classification problems and the proposal of a modified classification scheme.

Authors:  Stephan Frenzel; Vilmos Vécsei; Lukas Negrin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Cementless Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Min-Wook Kim; Young-Yool Chung; Jung-Ho Lee; Ji-Hoon Park
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-09-30

10.  Comparison of collum femoris-preserving stems and ribbed stems in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mingqing Li; Can Xu; Jie Xie; Yihe Hu; Hua Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.