Literature DB >> 26296332

Interference competition: odours of an apex predator and conspecifics influence resource acquisition by red foxes.

Viyanna Leo1, Richard P Reading2, Mike Letnic3.   

Abstract

Apex predators can impact smaller predators via lethal effects that occur through direct killing, and non-lethal effects that arise when fear-induced behavioural and physiological changes reduce the fitness of smaller predators. A general outcome of asymmetrical competition between co-existing predator species is that larger predators tend to suppress the abundances of smaller predators. Here, we investigate interference effects that an apex predator, the dingo (Canis dingo), has on the acquisition of food and water by the smaller red fox (Vulpes vulpes), by exposing free-ranging foxes to the odour of dingoes and conspecifics in an arid environment. Using giving-up densities we show that foxes foraged more apprehensively at predator-odour treatments than unscented controls, but their food intake did not differ between dingo- and fox-odour treatments. Using video analysis of fox behaviour at experimental water stations we show that foxes spent more time engaged in exploration behaviour at stations scented with fox odour and spent more time drinking at water stations scented with dingo odour. Our results provide support for the idea that dingo odour exerts a stronger interference effect on foxes than conspecific odour, but suggest that the odours of both larger dingoes and unfamiliar conspecifics curtailed foxes' acquisition of food resources.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dingo; Giving-up densities; Mesopredator release; Non-lethal effects; Olfactory communication

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26296332     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3423-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  14 in total

1.  Causes of mortality of free-ranging Florida panthers.

Authors:  Sharon K Taylor; Claus D Buergelt; Melody E Roelke-Parker; Bruce L Homer; Dave S Rotstein
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.535

Review 2.  Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in carnivora.

Authors:  Emiliano Donadio; Steven W Buskirk
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Patch use in time and space for a meso-predator in a risky world.

Authors:  Shomen Mukherjee; Michal Zelcer; Burt P Kotler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Density-dependent intraspecific aggression regulates survival in northern Yellowstone wolves (Canis lupus).

Authors:  Sarah Cubaynes; Daniel R MacNulty; Daniel R Stahler; Kira A Quimby; Douglas W Smith; Tim Coulson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 5.  Complex interactions among mammalian carnivores in Australia, and their implications for wildlife management.

Authors:  Alistair S Glen; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-08

6.  The use of urine marking in the scavenging behavior of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes).

Authors:  J D Henry
Journal:  Behaviour       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.991

7.  Scent-marking by coyotes, Canis latrans: the influence of social and ecological factors

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.844

8.  Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes?

Authors:  Kim Murray Berger; Eric M Gese
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  More than mere numbers: the impact of lethal control on the social stability of a top-order predator.

Authors:  Arian D Wallach; Euan G Ritchie; John Read; Adam J O'Neill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effect of illumination and time of day on movements of bobcats (Lynx rufus).

Authors:  Aimee P Rockhill; Christopher S DePerno; Roger A Powell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Mesopredator behavioral response to olfactory signals of an apex predator.

Authors:  Camilla Wikenros; Anders Jarnemo; Marielle Frisén; Dries P J Kuijper; Krzysztof Schmidt
Journal:  J Ethol       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 1.270

2.  Fear, foraging and olfaction: how mesopredators avoid costly interactions with apex predators.

Authors:  Peter M Haswell; Katherine A Jones; Josip Kusak; Matt W Hayward
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  The Wily and Courageous Red Fox: Behavioural Analysis of a Mesopredator at Resource Points Shared by an Apex Predator.

Authors:  Eamonn Wooster; Arian D Wallach; Daniel Ramp
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Wolf risk fails to inspire fear in two mesocarnivores suggesting facilitation prevails.

Authors:  Tom A Diserens; Marcin Churski; Jakub W Bubnicki; Andrzej Zalewski; Marcin Brzeziński; Dries P J Kuijper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Predation risk can modify the foraging behaviour of frugivorous carnivores: Implications of rewilding apex predators for plant-animal mutualisms.

Authors:  Tamara Burgos; Jose M Fedriani; Gema Escribano-Ávila; Javier Seoane; Javier Hernández-Hernández; Emilio Virgós
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 5.606

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.