Literature DB >> 19082629

Patch use in time and space for a meso-predator in a risky world.

Shomen Mukherjee1, Michal Zelcer, Burt P Kotler.   

Abstract

Predator-prey studies often assume a three trophic level system where predators forage free from any risk of predation. Since meso-predators themselves are also prospective prey, they too need to trade-off between food and safety. We applied foraging theory to study patch use and habitat selection by a meso-predator, the red fox. We present evidence that foxes use a quitting harvest rate rule when deciding whether or not to abandon a foraging patch, and experience diminishing returns when foraging from a depletable food patch. Furthermore, our data suggest that patch use decisions of red foxes are influenced not just by the availability of food, but also by their perceived risk of predation. Fox behavior was affected by moonlight, with foxes depleting food resources more thoroughly (lower giving-up density) on darker nights compared to moonlit nights. Foxes reduced risk from hyenas by being more active where and when hyena activity was low. While hyenas were least active during moon, and most active during full moon nights, the reverse was true for foxes. Foxes showed twice as much activity during new moon compared to full moon nights, suggesting different costs of predation. Interestingly, resources in patches with cues of another predator (scat of wolf) were depleted to significantly lower levels compared to patches without. Our results emphasize the need for considering risk of predation for intermediate predators, and also shows how patch use theory and experimental food patches can be used for a predator. Taken together, these results may help us better understand trophic interactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19082629     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1243-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

Review 1.  Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in carnivora.

Authors:  Emiliano Donadio; Steven W Buskirk
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2006-03-07       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

3.  Intraguild predation: The dynamics of complex trophic interactions.

Authors:  G A Polis; R D Holt
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey.

Authors:  A Sih; G Englund; D Wooster
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 5.  Higher-order predators and the regulation of insect herbivore populations.

Authors:  J A Rosenheim
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 19.686

6.  Testing values of crested porcupine habitats by experimental food patches.

Authors:  Joel S Brown; Philip U Alkon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Interference competition and niche theory.

Authors:  T J Case; M E Gilpin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Niche relations among three sympatric Mediterranean carnivores.

Authors:  Jose M Fedriani; Francisco Palomares; Miguel Delibes
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes?

Authors:  Kim Murray Berger; Eric M Gese
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.091

  9 in total
  14 in total

1.  Interference competition: odours of an apex predator and conspecifics influence resource acquisition by red foxes.

Authors:  Viyanna Leo; Richard P Reading; Mike Letnic
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Male moths optimally balance take-off thoracic temperature and warm-up duration to reach a pheromone source quickly.

Authors:  José G Crespo; Neil J Vickers; Franz Goller
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Higher nest predation risk in association with a top predator: mesopredator attraction?

Authors:  Chiara Morosinotto; Robert L Thomson; Mikko Hänninen; Erkki Korpimäki
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Moonlight avoidance in gerbils reveals a sophisticated interplay among time allocation, vigilance and state-dependent foraging.

Authors:  Burt P Kotler; Joel Brown; Shomen Mukherjee; Oded Berger-Tal; Amos Bouskila
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Responses of a top and a meso predator and their prey to moon phases.

Authors:  Vincenzo Penteriani; Anna Kuparinen; Maria del Mar Delgado; Francisco Palomares; José Vicente López-Bao; José María Fedriani; Javier Calzada; Sacramento Moreno; Rafael Villafuerte; Letizia Campioni; Rui Lourenço
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Avian top predator and the landscape of fear: responses of mammalian mesopredators to risk imposed by the golden eagle.

Authors:  Mari S Lyly; Alexandre Villers; Elina Koivisto; Pekka Helle; Tuomo Ollila; Erkki Korpimäki
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  In the absence of a "landscape of fear": How lions, hyenas, and cheetahs coexist.

Authors:  Alexandra Swanson; Todd Arnold; Margaret Kosmala; James Forester; Craig Packer
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-11-06       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Look before you leap: is risk of injury a foraging cost?

Authors:  Oded Berger-Tal; Shomen Mukherjee; Burt P Kotler; Joel S Brown
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 2.980

9.  Nuisance ecology: do scavenging condors exact foraging costs on pumas in Patagonia?

Authors:  L Mark Elbroch; Heiko U Wittmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessing the potential for intraguild predation among taxonomically disparate micro-carnivores: marsupials and arthropods.

Authors:  Tamara I Potter; Aaron C Greenville; Christopher R Dickman
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.