Literature DB >> 17922704

Does interference competition with wolves limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes?

Kim Murray Berger1, Eric M Gese.   

Abstract

Interference competition with wolves Canis lupus is hypothesized to limit the distribution and abundance of coyotes Canis latrans, and the extirpation of wolves is often invoked to explain the expansion in coyote range throughout much of North America. We used spatial, seasonal and temporal heterogeneity in wolf distribution and abundance to test the hypothesis that interference competition with wolves limits the distribution and abundance of coyotes. From August 2001 to August 2004, we gathered data on cause-specific mortality and survival rates of coyotes captured at wolf-free and wolf-abundant sites in Grand Teton National Park (GTNP), Wyoming, USA, to determine whether mortality due to wolves is sufficient to reduce coyote densities. We examined whether spatial segregation limits the local distribution of coyotes by evaluating home-range overlap between resident coyotes and wolves, and by contrasting dispersal rates of transient coyotes captured in wolf-free and wolf-abundant areas. Finally, we analysed data on population densities of both species at three study areas across the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) to determine whether an inverse relationship exists between coyote and wolf densities. Although coyotes were the numerically dominant predator, across the GYE, densities varied spatially and temporally in accordance with wolf abundance. Mean coyote densities were 33% lower at wolf-abundant sites in GTNP, and densities declined 39% in Yellowstone National Park following wolf reintroduction. A strong negative relationship between coyote and wolf densities (beta = -3.988, P < 0.005, r(2) = 0.54, n = 16), both within and across study sites, supports the hypothesis that competition with wolves limits coyote populations. Overall mortality of coyotes resulting from wolf predation was low, but wolves were responsible for 56% of transient coyote deaths (n = 5). In addition, dispersal rates of transient coyotes captured at wolf-abundant sites were 117% higher than for transients captured in wolf-free areas. Our results support the hypothesis that coyote abundance is limited by competition with wolves, and suggest that differential effects on survival and dispersal rates of transient coyotes are important mechanisms by which wolves reduce coyote densities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17922704     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01287.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  52 in total

Review 1.  The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology?

Authors:  John G Kie; Jason Matthiopoulos; John Fieberg; Roger A Powell; Francesca Cagnacci; Michael S Mitchell; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Paul R Moorcroft
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Patch use in time and space for a meso-predator in a risky world.

Authors:  Shomen Mukherjee; Michal Zelcer; Burt P Kotler
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Phylogenetic structure of mammal assemblages at large geographical scales: linking phylogenetic community ecology with macroecology.

Authors:  Marcel Cardillo
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Evolution in coyotes (Canis latrans) in response to the megafaunal extinctions.

Authors:  Julie A Meachen; Joshua X Samuels
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Interference competition: odours of an apex predator and conspecifics influence resource acquisition by red foxes.

Authors:  Viyanna Leo; Richard P Reading; Mike Letnic
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Food resources, distribution and seasonal variations in ranging in lion-tailed macaques, Macaca silenus in the Western Ghats, India.

Authors:  Joseph J Erinjery; T S Kavana; Mewa Singh
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 2.163

7.  Competition with stone crabs drives juvenile spiny lobster abundance and distribution.

Authors:  Donald C Behringer; John E Hart
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Keystone effects of an alien top-predator stem extinctions of native mammals.

Authors:  Mike Letnic; Freya Koch; Chris Gordon; Mathew S Crowther; Christopher R Dickman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Inter-specific territoriality in a Canis hybrid zone: spatial segregation between wolves, coyotes, and hybrids.

Authors:  John F Benson; Brent R Patterson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Mitochondrial DNA Variation in Southeastern Pre-Columbian Canids.

Authors:  Kristin E Brzeski; Melissa B DeBiasse; David R Rabon; Michael J Chamberlain; Sabrina S Taylor
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2016-01-16       Impact factor: 2.645

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.