Literature DB >> 9398369

Scent-marking by coyotes, Canis latrans: the influence of social and ecological factors

.   

Abstract

We observed 49 coyotes, Canis latransfrom five resident packs for 2456 h and five transient coyotes for 51 h from January 1991 to June 1993 in the Lamar River Valley, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming, U.S.A. During these observations we recorded 3042 urinations, 451 defecations, 446 ground scratches and 743 double-marks. The rate of scent-marking (via urination) was influenced by the social organization (resident versus transient) to which the coyote belonged, the social class (alpha, beta or pup) of the animal and the time of the year. Transient coyotes scent-marked at a lower rate than did members of a resident pack. Within the resident packs, alpha coyotes scent-marked at a higher rate than beta coyotes (adults and yearlings subordinant to alphas, but dominant over pups) and pups. Alpha coyotes increased their rate of marking during the breeding season; beta and pup coyotes performed scent-marks at a relatively constant rate throughout the year. There was no influence of social class or time of year on the rate of defecation. The rate of double-marking was highest among alpha coyotes with a peak during the breeding season. Alpha coyotes ground-scratched at a higher rate than did beta and pup coyotes. Alpha and beta coyotes scent-marked more than expected along the periphery of the territory compared to the interior; pups marked in the interior and edge in proportion to expected frequencies. Double-marking and ground-scratching were higher than expected along the periphery of the territory. The distribution of defecations was not different from expected along the edge versus the interior of the territory. Pack size did not influence the rate of scent-marking performed by individuals in the pack or by the alpha pair. We concluded that alpha coyotes were the primary members of the resident pack involved in scent-marking. The large coyote packs and the high rate of marking by the alpha pairs were parallel to the scent-marking behaviour displayed by wolves, C. lupusto a greater extent than previously reported. Scent-marks appear to provide internal information to the members of the resident pack (internal map of territory, breeding condition, reproductive synchrony) and enhance demarcation of territorial boundaries.Copyright 1997 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour1997The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour

Entities:  

Year:  1997        PMID: 9398369     DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Behav        ISSN: 0003-3472            Impact factor:   2.844


  15 in total

1.  Interference competition: odours of an apex predator and conspecifics influence resource acquisition by red foxes.

Authors:  Viyanna Leo; Richard P Reading; Mike Letnic
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Estimating population size by genotyping faeces.

Authors:  M H Kohn; E C York; D A Kamradt; G Haught; R M Sauvajot; R K Wayne
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1999-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Exposure to urine of canids and felids, but not of herbivores, induces defensive behavior in laboratory rats.

Authors:  Markus Fendt
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  The Equivocal Relationship Between Territoriality and Scent Marking in Wild Saddleback Tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis).

Authors:  Yvan Lledo-Ferrer; Fernando Peláez; Eckhard W Heymann
Journal:  Int J Primatol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  Inter-specific territoriality in a Canis hybrid zone: spatial segregation between wolves, coyotes, and hybrids.

Authors:  John F Benson; Brent R Patterson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  The concentration of fear: mice's behavioural and physiological stress responses to different degrees of predation risk.

Authors:  Beatriz Sánchez-González; Aimara Planillo; Álvaro Navarro-Castilla; Isabel Barja
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2018-01-31

7.  Space Use and Habitat Selection by Resident and Transient Red Wolves (Canis rufus).

Authors:  Joseph W Hinton; Christine Proctor; Marcella J Kelly; Frank T van Manen; Michael R Vaughan; Michael J Chamberlain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Owls may use faeces and prey feathers to signal current reproduction.

Authors:  Vincenzo Penteriani; Maria del Mar Delgado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The scent of wolves: pyrazine analogs induce avoidance and vigilance behaviors in prey.

Authors:  Kazumi Osada; Sadaharu Miyazono; Makoto Kashiwayanagi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Evaluating the responses of a territorial solitary carnivore to potential mates and competitors.

Authors:  Maximilian L Allen; Veronica Yovovich; Christopher C Wilmers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.