Literature DB >> 26295591

MR Imaging of Knee Arthroplasty Implants.

Jan Fritz1, Brett Lurie1, Hollis G Potter1.   

Abstract

Primary total knee arthroplasty is a highly effective treatment that relieves pain and improves joint function in a large percentage of patients. Despite an initially satisfactory surgical outcome, pain, dysfunction, and implant failure can occur over time. Identifying the etiology of complications is vital for appropriate management and proper timing of revision. Due to the increasing number of knee arthroplasties performed and decreasing patient age at implantation, there is a demand for accurate diagnosis to determine appropriate treatment of symptomatic joints following knee arthroplasty, and for monitoring of patients at risk. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging allows for comprehensive imaging evaluation of the tissues surrounding knee arthroplasty implants with metallic components, including the polyethylene components. Optimized conventional and advanced pulse sequences can result in substantial metallic artifact reduction and afford improved visualization of bone, implant-tissue interfaces, and periprosthetic soft tissue for the diagnosis of arthroplasty-related complications. In this review article, we discuss strategies for MR imaging around knee arthroplasty implants and illustrate the imaging appearances of common modes of failure, including aseptic loosening, polyethylene wear-induced synovitis and osteolysis, periprosthetic joint infections, fracture, patellar clunk syndrome, recurrent hemarthrosis, arthrofibrosis, component malalignment, extensor mechanism injury, and instability. A systematic approach is provided for evaluation of MR imaging of knee implants. MR imaging with optimized conventional pulse sequences and advanced metal artifact reduction techniques can contribute important information for diagnosis, prognosis, risk stratification, and surgical planning. (©)RSNA, 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26295591      PMCID: PMC4613886          DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015140216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  71 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hollis G Potter; Li Foong Foo
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.472

2.  MRI evaluation of rotational alignment and synovitis in patients with pain after total knee replacement.

Authors:  A M Murakami; T W Hash; M S Hepinstall; S Lyman; B J Nestor; H G Potter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2012-09

3.  Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991-2010.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Xin Lu; Stephen L Kates; Jasvinder A Singh; Yue Li; Brian R Wolf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Internal rotational error of the tibial component is a major cause of pain after total knee replacement.

Authors:  D Nicoll; D I Rowley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-09

5.  Lamellated hyperintense synovitis: potential MR imaging sign of an infected knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Andrew J Plodkowski; Catherine L Hayter; Theodore T Miller; Joseph T Nguyen; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Recurrent hemarthrosis after knee joint arthroplasty: etiology and treatment.

Authors:  Toshihiro Ohdera; Masami Tokunaga; Shiro Hiroshima; Eiji Yoshimoto; Shusaku Matsuda
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  MRI diagnosis of patellar clunk syndrome following total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Thomas J Heyse; Le Roy Chong; Jack Davis; Steven B Haas; Mark P Figgie; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2012-01-24

8.  SEMAC: Slice Encoding for Metal Artifact Correction in MRI.

Authors:  Wenmiao Lu; Kim Butts Pauly; Garry E Gold; John M Pauly; Brian A Hargreaves
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  How are wear-related problems diagnosed and what forms of surveillance are necessary?

Authors:  Henrik Malchau; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.020

10.  Computed tomography to assess pelvic lysis after total hip replacement.

Authors:  Alexandra M Claus; Saara M Totterman; Christi J Sychterz; José G Tamez-Peña; R John Looney; Charles A Engh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Imaging near orthopedic hardware.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Kevin M Koch; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Advanced metal artifact reduction MRI of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty implants: compressed sensing acceleration enables the time-neutral use of SEMAC.

Authors:  Jan Fritz; Benjamin Fritz; Gaurav K Thawait; Esther Raithel; Wesley D Gilson; Mathias Nittka; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Clinics in diagnostic imaging (208). Right knee patellar clunk syndrome.

Authors:  Jin Rong Tan; Adrian Cheng Kiang Lau; Tien Jin Tan
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.858

Review 4.  Methods of intra- and post-operative determination of the position of the tibial component during total knee replacement.

Authors:  Roman Popescu; Emil G Haritinian; Stefan Cristea
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-10-27       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Fracture of the polyethylene tibial post in the posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis: arthrographic and CT arthrographic diagnosis.

Authors:  Yung Hsu; Chien-Hung Lin; Ginger H F Shu; Tsyh-Jyi Hsieh; Clement Kuen-Huang Chen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Metal artifact reduction MRI of total ankle arthroplasty implants.

Authors:  Cesar de Cesar Netto; Lucas F Fonseca; Benjamin Fritz; Steven E Stern; Esther Raithel; Mathias Nittka; Lew C Schon; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Clinical magnetic resonance imaging of arthroplasty at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Matthew F Koff; Alissa J Burge; Hollis G Potter
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  MRI Findings at the Bone-Component Interface in Symptomatic Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty and the Relationship to Radiographic Findings.

Authors:  Laura Jill Kleeblad; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Alissa J Burge; Mark J Amirtharaj; Hollis G Potter; Andrew D Pearle
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2018-08-23

9.  Periprosthetic fracture management around total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Moritz F Mayr; Norbert P Südkamp; Lukas Konstantinidis
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-01-05

10.  Chronic recurrent multifocal osteomyelitis in a 3.5-year-old boy.

Authors:  Mohamad Ali Tahririan; Seyed Mohamad Hossein Tabatabaei Nodushan; Mehrdad Farrokhi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 1.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.