Gretchen D Oliver1, Jessica L Downs1, Germanna M Barbosa2, Paula R Camargo2. 1. The Sports Medicine & Movement Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA. 2. Department of Physical Therapy, Laboratory of Analysis and Intervention of the Shoulder Complex, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Brazil.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The unilateral and repetitive nature of overhead sports, often result in a biomechanical overload of the upper extremity. Understanding the musculoskeletal shoulder range of motion (ROM) and strength patterns in the youth sports of baseball, softball, and tennis could assist injury prevention screening and further the development of conditioning and rehabilitation programs. PURPOSE: To generate a descriptive profile of shoulder musculoskeletal characteristics and determine whether bilateral differences in shoulder ROM exist in youth baseball, softball, and tennis athletes. A secondary aim was to determine whether shoulder rotational adaptations are correlated with playing position, sport, or years of experience. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive Laboratory. METHODS: A total of 136 competitive youth overhead athletes (baseball: n = 51,12.8 ± 0.9yrs; softball: n = 63,12.3 ± 1.1yrs; and tennis: n = 22,12.5 ± 0.9yrs) participated. Bilateral shoulder internal (IR) and external (ER) passive ROM and external rotation strength were measured using an inclinometer and handheld dynamometer. RESULTS: Significant differences (p<.001) in bilateral shoulder ROM and ER strength were found between the athletes in the three sports. Post-hoc test revealed tennis athletes had greater bilateral shoulder ROM than both baseball and softball athletes, but baseball and softball athletes had greater bilateral ER strength than tennis athletes. There were no differences between baseball and softball athletes. Additionally, tennis athletes had greater bilateral internal rotation and total ROM but less ER strength than baseball pitchers, baseball positional athletes, softball pitchers, and softball positional athletes. There were no significant differences between positions and baseball and softball athletes. There were no significant correlations between playing position, sport, or years of experience. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed differences in shoulder passive ROM and strength adaptations between youth tennis, baseball, and softball athletes. The descriptive nature of this study is impactful as it presents specific ROM adaptions seen in this population. Future research is needed to further evaluate if the "at risk" ROM identified in older populations holds true in the youth population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnosis, Level 3b.
BACKGROUND: The unilateral and repetitive nature of overhead sports, often result in a biomechanical overload of the upper extremity. Understanding the musculoskeletal shoulder range of motion (ROM) and strength patterns in the youth sports of baseball, softball, and tennis could assist injury prevention screening and further the development of conditioning and rehabilitation programs. PURPOSE: To generate a descriptive profile of shoulder musculoskeletal characteristics and determine whether bilateral differences in shoulder ROM exist in youth baseball, softball, and tennis athletes. A secondary aim was to determine whether shoulder rotational adaptations are correlated with playing position, sport, or years of experience. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive Laboratory. METHODS: A total of 136 competitive youth overhead athletes (baseball: n = 51,12.8 ± 0.9yrs; softball: n = 63,12.3 ± 1.1yrs; and tennis: n = 22,12.5 ± 0.9yrs) participated. Bilateral shoulder internal (IR) and external (ER) passive ROM and external rotation strength were measured using an inclinometer and handheld dynamometer. RESULTS: Significant differences (p<.001) in bilateral shoulder ROM and ER strength were found between the athletes in the three sports. Post-hoc test revealed tennis athletes had greater bilateral shoulder ROM than both baseball and softball athletes, but baseball and softball athletes had greater bilateral ER strength than tennis athletes. There were no differences between baseball and softball athletes. Additionally, tennis athletes had greater bilateral internal rotation and total ROM but less ER strength than baseball pitchers, baseball positional athletes, softball pitchers, and softball positional athletes. There were no significant differences between positions and baseball and softball athletes. There were no significant correlations between playing position, sport, or years of experience. CONCLUSION: The results of this study showed differences in shoulder passive ROM and strength adaptations between youth tennis, baseball, and softball athletes. The descriptive nature of this study is impactful as it presents specific ROM adaptions seen in this population. Future research is needed to further evaluate if the "at risk" ROM identified in older populations holds true in the youth population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnosis, Level 3b.
Authors: Ann M J Cools; Fran Vanderstukken; Frédéric Vereecken; Mattias Duprez; Karel Heyman; Nick Goethals; Fredrik Johansson Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Kevin E Wilk; Padraic Obma; Charles D Simpson; E Lyle Cain; Jeffrey R Dugas; James R Andrews Journal: J Orthop Sports Phys Ther Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 4.751
Authors: John P DiFiori; Holly J Benjamin; Joel S Brenner; Andrew Gregory; Neeru Jayanthi; Greg L Landry; Anthony Luke Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 13.800
Authors: Roger Ostrander; Rafael F Escamilla; Ryan Hess; Kevin Witte; Luke Wilcox; James R Andrews Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Priscilla M Dwelly; Brady L Tripp; Patricia A Tripp; Lindsey E Eberman; Steven Gorin Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Fredrik Johansson; Martin Asker; Andreas Malmberg; Jaime Fernandez-Fernandez; Anna Warnqvist; Ann Cools Journal: Front Sports Act Living Date: 2022-02-17