Literature DB >> 23867076

Significantly improved performance of a multitarget assay over a commercial SCCmec-based assay for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening: applicability for clinical laboratories.

Ivan Brukner1, Matthew Oughton, Anastasia Giannakakis, Ryan Kerzner, Andre Dascal.   

Abstract

Detection of the SCCmec gene is a common strategy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) screening assays. However, if SCCmec is used alone, it may not be specific for detecting MRSA. Herein, we describe an in-house MSRA PCR-based screening assay involving detection of three targets (nuc, coa, and mecA). The assay is suitable for a wide range of real-time PCR platforms used in clinical microbiological laboratories. Performance characteristics of the in-house assay were significantly improved compared with the commercial assay, leading to an increase of positive predictive value by 40%. Compared with the bacterial culture, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the in-house PCR assay were 100% (95% CI >83.2%), 99.2% (95% CI = 98.2% to 99.8%), 80% (95% CI = 59.3% to 93.2%), and 100% (95% CI >99.2%), respectively.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23867076     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  7 in total

1.  Inadequate research on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus risk among postpartum women.

Authors:  Andrea M Parriott; Angela Lp Chow; Onyebuchi A Arah
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.091

2.  Evaluation of the BD Max StaphSR Assay for Rapid Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus in Positive Blood Culture Broths.

Authors:  Alexander H Dalpke; Marjeta Hofko; Fiona Hamilton; Laura Mackenzie; Stefan Zimmermann; Kate Templeton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of the BD Max MRSA XT assay for use with different swab types.

Authors:  Alexander H Dalpke; Marjeta Hofko; Christian Stock; Stefan Zimmermann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Control in the 21st Century: Laboratory Involvement Affecting Disease Impact and Economic Benefit from Large Population Studies.

Authors:  Lance R Peterson; Donna M Schora
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Evaluation of BD Max StaphSR and BD Max MRSAXT Assays Using ESwab-Collected Specimens.

Authors:  Suzane Silbert; Carly Kubasek; Faris Galambo; Elaine Vendrone; Raymond Widen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  A rapid and high-throughput screening approach for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus based on the combination of two different real-time PCR assays.

Authors:  Roel H T Nijhuis; Noortje M van Maarseveen; Erik J van Hannen; Anton A van Zwet; Ellen M Mascini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Laboratory-Based and Point-of-Care Testing for MSSA/MRSA Detection in the Age of Whole Genome Sequencing.

Authors:  Alex van Belkum; Olivier Rochas
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.