Literature DB >> 26290653

Contrasting the effects of environment, dispersal and biotic interactions to explain the distribution of invasive plants in alpine communities.

Laure Gallien1, Florent Mazel2, Sébastien Lavergne2, Julien Renaud2, Rolland Douzet3, Wilfried Thuiller2.   

Abstract

Despite considerable efforts devoted to investigate the community assembly processes driving plant invasions, few general conclusions have been drawn so far. Three main processes, generally acting as successive filters, are thought to be of prime importance. The invader has to disperse (1st filter) into a suitable environment (2nd filter) and succeed in establishing in recipient communities through competitive interactions (3rd filter) using two strategies: competition avoidance by the use of different resources (resource opportunity), or competitive exclusion of native species. Surprisingly, despite the general consensus on the importance of investigating these three processes and their interplay, they are usually studied independently. Here we aim to analyse these three filters together, by including them all: abiotic environment, dispersal and biotic interactions, into models of invasive species distributions. We first propose a suite of indices (based on species functional dissimilarities) supposed to reflect the two competitive strategies (resource opportunity and competition exclusion). Then, we use a set of generalised linear models to explain the distribution of seven herbaceous invaders in natural communities (using a large vegetation database for the French Alps containing 5,000 community-plots). Finally, we measure the relative importance of competitive interaction indices, identify the type of coexistence mechanism involved and how this varies along environmental gradients. Adding competition indices significantly improved model's performance, but neither resource opportunity nor competitive exclusion were common strategies among the seven species. Overall, we show that combining environmental, dispersal and biotic information to model invasions has excellent potential for improving our understanding of invader success.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alien species; competitive exclusion; dispersal; environmental filtering; niche model; resource opportunity

Year:  2015        PMID: 26290653      PMCID: PMC4538782          DOI: 10.1007/s10530-014-0803-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Invasions        ISSN: 1387-3547            Impact factor:   3.133


  30 in total

1.  Positive interactions among alpine plants increase with stress.

Authors:  Ragan M Callaway; R W Brooker; Philippe Choler; Zaal Kikvidze; Christopher J Lortie; Richard Michalet; Leonardo Paolini; Francisco I Pugnaire; Beth Newingham; Erik T Aschehoug; Cristina Armas; David Kikodze; Bradley J Cook
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Community assembly and invasion: an experimental test of neutral versus niche processes.

Authors:  Joseph Fargione; Cynthia S Brown; David Tilman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Functional- and abundance-based mechanisms explain diversity loss due to N fertilization.

Authors:  Katharine N Suding; Scott L Collins; Laura Gough; Christopher Clark; Elsa E Cleland; Katherine L Gross; Daniel G Milchunas; Steven Pennings
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Gis-based niche models reveal unifying climatic mechanisms that maintain the location of avian hybrid zones in a North American suture zone.

Authors:  N G Swenson
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.411

5.  Invasional meltdown 6 years later: important phenomenon, unfortunate metaphor, or both?

Authors:  Daniel Simberloff
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Toward a causal explanation of plant invasiveness: seedling growth and life-history strategies of 29 pine (Pinus) species.

Authors:  Eva Grotkopp; Marcel Rejmánek; Thomas L Rost
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants.

Authors:  Carolina Laura Morales; Anna Traveset
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 9.  Naturalization of introduced plants: ecological drivers of biogeographical patterns.

Authors:  David M Richardson; Petr Pyšek
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 10.151

10.  Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution.

Authors:  Carolin Strobl; Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Achim Zeileis; Torsten Hothorn
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  5 in total

1.  What it takes to invade grassland ecosystems: traits, introduction history and filtering processes.

Authors:  Marta Carboni; Tamara Münkemüller; Sébastien Lavergne; Philippe Choler; Benjamin Borgy; Cyrille Violle; Franz Essl; Cristina Roquet; François Munoz; Wilfried Thuiller
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 9.492

2.  Contrasting alien effects on native diversity along biotic and abiotic gradients in an arid protected area.

Authors:  Reham F El-Barougy; Ibrahim A Elgamal; Abdel-Hamid A Khedr; Louis-Félix Bersier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Functional traits predict resident plant response to Reynoutria japonica invasion in riparian and fallow communities in southern Poland.

Authors:  Marcin W Woch; Paweł Kapusta; Małgorzata Stanek; Szymon Zubek; Anna M Stefanowicz
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.276

4.  A modeling framework for the establishment and spread of invasive species in heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Audrey Lustig; Susan P Worner; Joel P W Pitt; Crile Doscher; Daniel B Stouffer; Senait D Senay
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.167

Review 5.  Solutions in microbiome engineering: prioritizing barriers to organism establishment.

Authors:  Michaeline B N Albright; Stilianos Louca; Daniel E Winkler; Kelli L Feeser; Sarah-Jane Haig; Katrine L Whiteson; Joanne B Emerson; John Dunbar
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2021-08-21       Impact factor: 10.302

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.