Literature DB >> 19453616

A meta-analysis of impacts of alien vs. native plants on pollinator visitation and reproductive success of co-flowering native plants.

Carolina Laura Morales1, Anna Traveset.   

Abstract

Alien plant species can alter pollinator visitation and, in turn, the sexual reproduction of natives. Using a conventional and a phylogenetically controlled meta-analytical approach on a data set of 40 studies, we evaluated the effect of alien neighbour plant species (aliens) on visitation to and reproduction of native co-flowering focal species (focals), and compared such effect to that of native neighbours (natives). An overall significantly negative effect of aliens on visitation to and reproduction of focals was confirmed. Interestingly, aliens differed from natives in their effect on visitation, but not on reproductive success. The negative effect of aliens on visitation and reproductive success increased at high relative alien plant abundance, but this increase was proportionally lower than the increase in relative plant abundance. Likewise, effect of aliens on visitation and reproductive success was most detrimental when alien and focal species had similar flower symmetry or colour. The phylogenetic relatedness between alien neighbours and focals influenced the reproductive success effect size. Results of the phylogenetic meta-analysis were only partly consistent with those of the conventional meta-analysis, depending on the response variable and on whether we controlled for the phylogeny of neighbour or focal species, which calls for special attention to control for species relatedness in this type of review. This study demonstrates the predominant detrimental impact of alien plants on pollination and reproduction of natives, and highlights the importance of phenotypic similarity to the outcome of the interaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19453616     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01319.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  44 in total

1.  Phylogenetic relatedness as a tool in restoration ecology: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel Verdú; Lorena Gómez-Aparicio; Alfonso Valiente-Banuet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Pollination patterns and plant breeding systems in the Galapagos: a review.

Authors:  Susana Chamorro; Ruben Heleno; Jens M Olesen; Conley K McMullen; Anna Traveset
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Effects of floral restrictiveness and stigma size on heterospecific pollen receipt in a prairie community.

Authors:  Benjamin R Montgomery; Beverly J Rathcke
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  The presence of co-flowering species facilitates reproductive success of Pedicularis monbeigiana (Orobanchaceae) through variation in bumble-bee foraging behaviour.

Authors:  Kuo Liao; Robert W Gituru; You-Hao Guo; Qing-Feng Wang
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Conspecific flowers of Sinapis arvensis are stronger competitors for pollinators than those of the invasive weed Bunias orientalis.

Authors:  Axel Hochkirch; Tamara Mertes; Julia Rautenberg
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-03

6.  Additive effects of exotic plant abundance and land-use intensity on plant-pollinator interactions.

Authors:  Ingo Grass; Dana Gertrud Berens; Franziska Peter; Nina Farwig
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Invasive plant integration into native plant-pollinator networks across Europe.

Authors:  Montserrat Vilà; Ignasi Bartomeus; Anke C Dietzsch; Theodora Petanidou; Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter; Jane C Stout; Thomas Tscheulin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function.

Authors:  Christopher N Kaiser-Bunbury; James Mougal; Andrew E Whittington; Terence Valentin; Ronny Gabriel; Jens M Olesen; Nico Blüthgen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Effects of spatial patterning of co-flowering plant species on pollination quantity and purity.

Authors:  James D Thomson; Hannah F Fung; Jane E Ogilvie
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Indirect competition for pollinators is weak compared to direct resource competition: pollination and performance in the face of an invader.

Authors:  Jennifer D Palladini; John L Maron
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.