| Literature DB >> 26689431 |
Marta Carboni1,2, Tamara Münkemüller1,2, Sébastien Lavergne1,2, Philippe Choler1,2, Benjamin Borgy3,4, Cyrille Violle3, Franz Essl5, Cristina Roquet1,2, François Munoz6,7, Wilfried Thuiller1,2.
Abstract
Whether the success of alien species can be explained by their functional or phylogenetic characteristics remains unresolved because of data limitations, scale issues and weak quantifications of success. Using permanent grasslands across France (50 000 vegetation plots, 2000 species, 130 aliens) and building on the Rabinowitz's classification to quantify spread, we showed that phylogenetic and functional similarities to natives were the most important correlates of invasion success compared to intrinsic functional characteristics and introduction history. Results contrasted between spatial scales and components of invasion success. Widespread and common aliens were similar to co-occurring natives at coarse scales (indicating environmental filtering), but dissimilar at finer scales (indicating local competition). In contrast, regionally widespread but locally rare aliens showed patterns of competitive exclusion already at coarse scale. Quantifying trait differences between aliens and natives and distinguishing the components of invasion success improved our ability to understand and potentially predict alien spread at multiple scales.Entities:
Keywords: Alien species; Rabinowitz; functional and phylogenetic similarity; invasibility; invasion success; invasiveness
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26689431 PMCID: PMC4972145 DOI: 10.1111/ele.12556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Lett ISSN: 1461-023X Impact factor: 9.492