| Literature DB >> 26290472 |
Chun Wie Chong1, Arine Fadzlun Ahmad2, Yvonne Ai Lian Lim2, Cindy Shuan Ju Teh3, Ivan Kok Seng Yap1, Soo Ching Lee2, Yuee Teng Chin2, P'ng Loke4, Kek Heng Chua5.
Abstract
Gut microbiota plays an important role in mammalian host metabolism and physiological functions. The functions are particularly important in young children where rapid mental and physical developments are taking place. Nevertheless, little is known about the gut microbiome and the factors that contribute to microbial variation in the gut of South East Asian children. Here, we compared the gut bacterial richness and composition of pre-adolescence in Northern Malaysia. Our subjects covered three distinct ethnic groups with relatively narrow range of socioeconomic discrepancy. These included the Malays (n = 24), Chinese (n = 17) and the Orang Asli (indigenous) (n = 20). Our results suggested a strong ethnicity and socioeconomic-linked bacterial diversity. Highest bacterial diversity was detected from the economically deprived indigenous children while the lowest diversity was recorded from the relatively wealthy Chinese children. In addition, predicted functional metagenome profiling suggested an over-representation of pathways pertinent to bacterial colonisation and chemotaxis in the former while the latter exhibited enriched gene pathways related to sugar metabolism.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26290472 PMCID: PMC4542465 DOI: 10.1038/srep13338
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Socio-economic characteristics and hygiene level of rural children aged 7–12 in Pangkor and Bota, Perak, Malaysia.
| Malays | Chinese | Orang Asli | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sum | Sum | Sum | |||||
| Socioeconomic characteristics | |||||||
| Ethnicity | 24 | 17 | 20 | 61 | |||
| Gender | |||||||
| | 15 | 8 | 10 | 33 | |||
| | 9 | 9 | 10 | 28 | |||
| Income | |||||||
| | 2 | 8.3 | 0 | 9 | 11 | ||
| Family Size | 18 | 75 | 1 | 10 | 29 | ||
| Rear pet(s) | 9 | 14.8 | 0 | 19 | 28 | ||
| Hygiene level | |||||||
| Parasitic Infection | |||||||
| | 2 | 8.3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | ||
| | 1 | 4.2 | 0 | 20 | 21 | ||
| Pipe water availability | 24 | 100 | 17 | 16 | 57 | ||
| Water storage | |||||||
| | 17 | 70.8 | 0 | 10 | 27 | ||
| | 6 | 25 | 1 | 10 | 17 | ||
| | 1 | 42 | 16 | 0 | 17 | ||
| Cover water storage | 20 | 83.3 | 1 | 20 | 41 | ||
| Bathing locations | |||||||
| | 23 | 95.8 | 17 | 0 | 40 | ||
| | 1 | 4.2 | 0 | 20 | 21 | ||
| Defecation locations | |||||||
| | 24 | 100 | 17 | 5 | 46 | ||
| | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 15 | ||
| Proper rubbish disposal | 23 | 95.8 | 17 | 15 | 55 | ||
aTrichuris tichiuria only.
bCombination of at least two of the following: Trichuris trichiura, Iodamoeba butschlii, Blastocystis spp., Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba coli, Ascaris lumbricoides, and hookworm.
cPipe water supply to the household.
Figure 1Canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) for TRFLP data.
A 67% correct prediction rate was recorded based on the cross validation. Note: Dotted samples were chosen for 16S NGS analysis.
Distance-based linear models of socioeconomic and hygiene characteristics of faecal bacterial composition in children.
| Marginal Tests (Grouped variables) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | SS(trace) | Pseudo-F | P | Prop. | |||
| Socioeconomic | 16346 | 1.6534 | 0.014 | 0.155 | |||
| Hygiene | 19159 | 1.6836 | 0.012 | 0.181 | |||
| Marginal Tests (Individual variables) | |||||||
| Variable | SS(trace) | Pseudo-F | P | Prop. | Group | ||
| Water storage | 8651.9 | 5.2806 | 0.001 | 0.082 | H | ||
| Cover water storage | 7830 | 4.7387 | 0.001 | 0.074 | H | ||
| Parasitic infection | 4793.4 | 2.8133 | 0.014 | 0.046 | H | ||
| Rear pet | 4855.4 | 2.8515 | 0.014 | 0.046 | S | ||
| Bathing locations | 4261.5 | 2.488 | 0.018 | 0.040 | H | ||
| Ethnicity | 4178.6 | 2.4376 | 0.024 | 0.040 | S | ||
| Family size | 4416.9 | 2.5827 | 0.024 | 0.042 | S | ||
| Defecation locations | 3353.1 | 1.9402 | 0.044 | 0.032 | H | ||
| Sequential Tests | |||||||
| Overall | |||||||
| Variable | AIC | SS(trace) | Pseudo-F | P | Prop. | Cumul. | res.df |
| Water Storage | 453.66 | 8651.9 | 5.28 | 0.001 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 59 |
| Parastic infection | 453.25 | 4071.8 | 2.55 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 58 |
| Orang Asli | |||||||
| Variable | AIC | SS(trace) | Pseudo-F | P | Prop. | Cumul. | res.df |
| Pet | 148.64 | 4359.8 | 2.84 | 0.049 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 18 |
| Water Storage | 148.43 | 2893.7 | 1.99 | 0.067 | 0.09 | 0.23 | 17 |
| Malays/Chinese | |||||||
| Variable | None | ||||||
*Only elements with significant effect are included.
Figure 2Principle coordinate analysis of 16S NGS sequences distribution (square root transformed) based on
(a) Sorensen (membership) and (b) Bray-Curtis similarity (composition) index.
Figure 3Bacterial phyla distribution inferred based on 16S-based pyrosequencing.
The distribution was obtained through sub-sampling of 2503 sequences (the lowest obtained sequences in a sample) across all samples.
Taxonomic identity of gut microbial taxa showing significant difference in abundance across Malay, Chinese and Orang Asli children.
| Differential abundance taxonomic unit Phylum/Order/Genus | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malays VS Chinese | None | ||||
| Orang Asli VS Malays | Phylum | Mean in Orang Asli | Mean in Malays | p-value | q-value |
| unclassified bacteria | 0.072 | 0.008 | 0.005 | 0.002 | |
| 0.036 | 0 | 0.017 | 0.004 | ||
| Order | Mean in Orang Asli | Mean in Malays | p-value | q-value | |
| unclassified | 0.116 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.009 | |
| unclassified | 0.001 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.010 | |
| 0.143 | 0.301 | 0.002 | 0.014 | ||
| 0.005 | 0 | 0.005 | 0.021 | ||
| unclassified bacteria | 0.067 | 0.007 | 0.011 | 0.041 | |
| unclassified | 0.001 | 0 | 0.014 | 0.041 | |
| 0.006 | 0.014 | 0.019 | 0.050 | ||
| Genus | Mean in Orang Asli | Mean in Malays | p-value | q-value | |
| unclassified | 0.200 | 0.037 | 0 | 0 | |
| Orang Asli VS Chinese | Phylum | ||||
| None | |||||
| Order | Mean in Orang Asli | Mean in Chinese | p-value | q-value | |
| unclassified | 0.116 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.004 | |
| unclassified | 0.001 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.021 | |
| 0.005 | 0 | 0.002 | 0.052 | ||
| Genus | Mean in OrangAsli | Mean in Chinese | p-value | q-value | |
| unclassified | 0.200 | 0.029 | 0 | 0 | |
| unclassified | 0.083 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.010 | |
| unclassified | 0.119 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.041 | |
| 0 | 0.049 | 0.001 | 0.042 |
Note: only taxonomic units with p-value and q-value ≤ 0.05 were reported.
Figure 4Pairwise comparison of the predicted functional profiles.
Note: Only statistical significant features (P < 0.05) were included in the figure.