| Literature DB >> 29642940 |
Zhenwei Dai1,2, Olabisi Oluwabukola Coker1,2, Geicho Nakatsu1,2, William K K Wu1,2, Liuyang Zhao1,2, Zigui Chen3, Francis K L Chan1,2, Karsten Kristiansen4,5, Joseph J Y Sung1,2, Sunny Hei Wong6,7, Jun Yu8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Alterations of gut microbiota are associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) in different populations and several bacterial species were found to contribute to the tumorigenesis. The potential use of gut microbes as markers for early diagnosis has also been reported. However, cohort specific noises may distort the structure of microbial dysbiosis in CRC and lead to inconsistent results among studies. In this regard, our study targeted at exploring changes in gut microbiota that are universal across populations at species level.Entities:
Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Diagnostic marker; Ecology; Microbiota
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29642940 PMCID: PMC5896039 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-018-0451-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Fecal samples’ demographic, clinical, and technical details
| Cohort | Factor | Control | CRC | Sample collection | Sequencing platform | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort C1 (American, 2016) | Sample size | 52 | 48 | NA | Prior to surgery and treatment | Sequencing Platform: Illumina Hiseq 2000/2500; Sequencing Target Depth: 5GB; read length: 100 bp |
| Age | 61.23(11.03) | 60.96(13.56) | 0.913 | |||
| Gender | Male:37; Female:15 | Male:35; Female:13 | 1 | |||
| BMI | 25.35(4.27) | 24.90(4.29) | 0.601 | |||
| Cohort C2 (Austrian, 2014) | Sample size | 63 | 46 | NA | Not available | |
| Age | 67.1(6.37) | 67.1(10.91) | 0.999 | |||
| Gender | Male:37; Female:26 | Male:28; Female:18 | 0.978 | |||
| BMI | 27.57(3.78) | 26.50(3.53) | 0.132 | |||
| Cohort C3 (Chinese, 2015) | Sample size | 92 | 73 | NA | No antibiotics and no invasive medical intervention for 3 months; no vegetarian diet; no history of cancer or inflammatory disease of intestine | |
| Age | 58.51(7.55) | 65.90(10.61) | < 0.0001 | |||
| Gender | Male:51; Female:41 | Male:47; Female:26 | 0.316 | |||
| BMI | 23.87(3.31) | 24.07(3.18) | 0.697 | |||
| Cohort C4 (German and French, 2014) | Sample size | 64 | 88 | NA | No previous colon or rectal surgery, colorectal cancer, inflammatory, or infectious injuries of the intestine; no need for need for emergency colonoscopy | |
| Age | 58.75(12.96) | 68.44(12.22) | 0.007 | |||
| Gender | Male:32; Female:32 | Male:53; Female:35 | 0.276 | |||
| BMI | 24.72(3.19) | 25.89(4.29) | 0.056 |
Fig. 1Microbial composition and statistical power difference across cohorts. a–c Principal coordinate analysis for control samples, CRC samples, and all samples, respectively. (CA, CRC; NC, negative control) The correlations between phenotypes and PCoAs are labeled with their corresponding coordinates. d Statistical power to detect differentially abundant bacteria of various fold change (fold change = 10, 20, and 40%) versus cohort sample size (number of control samples × number of case samples)
Fig. 2Differentially abundant bacteria in CRC across cohorts. a Left panel; abundance of 7 CRC-enriched species and 20 CRC-depleted species with largest fold change. The bacteria abundance was normalized to natural log fold change relative to abundance median of control samples. Right panel; confidence interval for individual pair fold change. The confidence intervals were calculated based on Wilcoxon signed-rank test. b Violin graph for the abundance of the 7 CRC-enriched bacteria in different cohorts. Abundance change significance within individual cohort is labeled with * (P < 0.05, *P < 0.01, **P < 0.001, ***). c Prediction power of 7 CRC-enriched bacteria with SVM model
Fig. 3Meta-analysis of correlations among CRC-associated bacteria. a Correlation between the 69 CRC differentially abundant bacteria in CRC samples. Nodes having correlations between circles were labeled with dark blue, and the four CRC-enriched oral species were labeled with dark red. Five commensal bacterial species were denoted with triangle shape nodes. The size of the nodes is proportional to their corresponding centrality. Node attributes are included in Additional file 28: Table S3. b Comparison of the correlation network between CRC-depleted bacteria in control and CRC showing the mid-points of histogram bars. Cubic spline was used to connect the points
Fig. 4Correlation network between CRC-enriched bacteria and KO categories. Nodes with the same color share the same CRC-enriched pathway. Seven KEGG pathways that were enriched in CRC and involve CRC-enriched bacteria correlated KO categories are listed. The corresponding adjusted P values of the abundance change from control to CRC are also provided. Correlation details are attached in Additional file 29: Table S8 and Additional file 27: Table S9