Literature DB >> 23949381

The motor system resonates to the distal goal of observed actions: testing the inverse pliers paradigm in an ecological setting.

Luigi Cattaneo1, Francesca Maule, Guido Barchiesi, Giacomo Rizzolatti.   

Abstract

Does motor mirroring in humans reflect the observed movements or the goal of the observed motor acts? Tools that dissociate the agent/object dynamics from the movements of the body parts used to operate them provide a model for testing resonance to both movements and goals. Here, we describe the temporal relationship of the observer's motor excitability, assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), with the observed goal-directed tool actions, in an ecological setting. Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) to TMS were recorded from the opponens pollicis (OP, thumb flexor) and the extensor indicis proprius (EIP, index extensor) muscles of participants while they observed a person moving several small objects with a pair of normal pliers (closed by finger flexion) or reverse pliers (opened by finger flexion). The MEPs were a significant predictor of the pliers' kinematics that occurred in a variable time interval between -400 and +300 ms from TMS. Whatever pliers' type was being observed, OP MEPs correlated positively and EIP MEPs correlated negatively with the velocity of pliers' tips closure. This datum was confirmed both at individual and at a group level. Motor simulation can be demonstrated in single observers in a "real-life" ecological setting. The relation of motor resonance to the tool type shows that the observer's motor system codes the distal goal of the observed acts (i.e., grasping and releasing objects) in terms of its own motor vocabulary, irrespective of the actual finger movements that were performed by the observed actor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23949381     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3664-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

1.  Movement-related neuronal activity reflecting the transformation of coordinates in the ventral premotor cortex of monkeys.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Kurata; Eiji Hoshi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Variability in the effector-specific pattern of motor facilitation during the observation of everyday actions: implications for the clinical use of action observation.

Authors:  S Hétu; M Gagné; P L Jackson; C Mercier
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Observing how others lift light or heavy objects: which visual cues mediate the encoding of muscular force in the primary motor cortex?

Authors:  Kaat Alaerts; Stephan P Swinnen; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Motor facilitation during action observation: topographic mapping of the target muscle and influence of the onlooker's posture.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Matteo Candidi; Franco Fabbro; Michela Romani; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  How are observed actions mapped to the observer's motor system? Influence of posture and perspective.

Authors:  Kaat Alaerts; Elke Heremans; Stephan P Swinnen; Nicole Wenderoth
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey. II. Area F5 and the control of distal movements.

Authors:  G Rizzolatti; R Camarda; L Fogassi; M Gentilucci; G Luppino; M Matelli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain.

Authors:  Svenja Caspers; Karl Zilles; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The human dorsal stream adapts to real actions and 3D shape processing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  G Króliczak; T D McAdam; D J Quinlan; J C Culham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  The mirror neuron system.

Authors:  Luigi Cattaneo; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2009-05

10.  Representation of goal and movements without overt motor behavior in the human motor cortex: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  Luigi Cattaneo; Fausto Caruana; Ahmad Jezzini; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Generalization of motor resonance during the observation of hand, mouth, and eye movements.

Authors:  Alessandra Finisguerra; Laura Maffongelli; Michela Bassolino; Marco Jacono; Thierry Pozzo; Alessandro D'Ausilio
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  I know what I will see: action-specific motor preparation activity in a passive observation task.

Authors:  Chiara Bozzacchi; Donatella Spinelli; Sabrina Pitzalis; Maria Assunta Giusti; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Facial expressions as a model to test the role of the sensorimotor system in the visual perception of the actions.

Authors:  Sonia Mele; Valentina Ghirardi; Laila Craighero
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Flexible Visuomotor Associations in Touchscreen Control.

Authors:  Sara Fabbri; Luc P J Selen; Robert J van Beers; W P Medendorp
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Directing visual attention during action observation modulates corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  David J Wright; Greg Wood; Zoe C Franklin; Ben Marshall; Martin Riach; Paul S Holmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Blocking facial mimicry affects recognition of facial and body expressions.

Authors:  Sara Borgomaneri; Corinna Bolloni; Paola Sessa; Alessio Avenanti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pictures of disgusting foods and disgusted facial expressions suppress the tongue motor cortex.

Authors:  Carmelo M Vicario; Robert D Rafal; Sara Borgomaneri; Riccardo Paracampo; Ada Kritikos; Alessio Avenanti
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.436

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.