| Literature DB >> 26288662 |
Ha-Na Kim1, Se-Hong Kim1, Young-Mi Eun1, Sang-Wook Song1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but metabolic disturbances can also lead to the development of this disease. Therefore, we investigated the associations between obesity subtype, considering both body weight and metabolic disturbances, and carotid atherosclerosis as a predictor of cardiovascular disease in Korean men.Entities:
Keywords: Carotid atherosclerosis; Carotid intima-media thickness; Carotid plaque; Metabolic syndrome; Obesity
Year: 2015 PMID: 26288662 PMCID: PMC4539682 DOI: 10.1186/s13098-015-0063-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr ISSN: 1758-5996 Impact factor: 3.320
Characteristics of the study participants according to subtypes of obesity
| All | MHNW | MHO | MANW | MAO | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | 980 (100.0) | 406 (41.4) | 241 (24.6) | 80 (8.2) | 253 (25.8) | – |
| Age (years) | 49.9 ± 10.8 | 49.8 ± 11.1 | 47.3 ± 10.7 | 55.2 ± 10.2 | 50.7 ± 9.9 | <0.001 |
| Current smoking (%) | 36.1 | 36.2 | 37.2 | 28.2 | 37.2 | 0.378 |
| Heavy drinking (%) | 28.1 | 26.1 | 31.5 | 28.6 | 27.9 | 0.542 |
| Low physical activity (%) | 59.1 | 57.1 | 56.1 | 70.0 | 61.8 | 0.273 |
| Diabetes mellitus (%) | 11.6 | 7.2 | 4.2 | 31.3 | 19.4 | <0.001 |
| Hypertension (%) | 24.5 | 13.8 | 16.3 | 43.8 | 43.1 | <0.001 |
| Dyslipidemia (%) | 4.0 | 2.2 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 6.7 | 0.041 |
| Fasting glucose (mg/dL)a | 95 (88–105) | 91 (85–98) | 92 (87–98) | 105 (100–139) | 104 (94–119) | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL)a | 199 (174–223) | 199 (176–223) | 201 (176–226) | 194 (178–221) | 205 (172–231) | 0.767 |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL)a | 130 (92–184) | 102 (75–140) | 113 (90–146) | 183 (141–235) | 177 (135–242) | <0.001 |
| HDL-C (mg/dL)a | 43 (37–47) | 47 (42–55) | 44 (40–49) | 37 (34–42) | 37 (34–44) | <0.001 |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) | 122.8 ± 32.1 | 123.1 ± 30.6 | 124.8 ± 32.8 | 121.2 ± 36.7 | 121.2 ± 32.3 | 0.613 |
| HOMA-IR indexa | 0.84 (0.46–1.75) | 0.51 (0.42–1.05) | 0.86 (0.47–1.55) | 1.29 (0.63–2.14) | 1.59 (0.82–2.69) | <0.001 |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | 92.3 ± 16.1 | 94.5 ± 14.3 | 91.7 ± 17.2 | 89.3 ± 17.4 | 90.2 ± 16.9 | 0.002 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 127.0 ± 12.8 | 123.2 ± 12.9 | 124.7 ± 12.4 | 134.0 ± 10.6 | 131.6 ± 11.5 | <0.001 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 77.4 ± 9.5 | 75.1 ± 9.3 | 75.5 ± 9.5 | 81.9 ± 8.6 | 80.5 ± 9.0 | <0.001 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 88.0 ± 7.4 | 82.2 ± 5.1 | 91.2 ± 4.4 | 85.8 ± 4.1 | 95.1 ± 5.7 | <0.001 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 25.1 ± 2.9 | 22.6 ± 1.7 | 26.8 ± 1.7 | 23.5 ± 1.1 | 27.9 ± 2.2 | <0.001 |
| Mean CIMT (mm)a | 0.75 (0.65–0.88) | 0.72 (0.62–0.84) | 0.72 (0.62–0.84) | 0.77 (0.67–0.91) | 0.80 (0.70–0.90) | <0.001 |
| Carotid plaque (%) | 28.1 | 26.6 | 22.4 | 33.8 | 34.0 | 0.019 |
| Carotid atherosclerosis (%) | 38.7 | 36.0 | 33.2 | 46.3 | 45.8 | 0.008 |
CIMT carotid intima-media thickness, DBP diastolic blood pressure, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, MANW metabolically abnormal, but normal weight, MAO metabolically abnormal obese, MHO metabolically healthy, but obese, MHNW metabolically healthy normal weight, SBP systolic blood pressure
aValues are expressed as means ± standard deviation or percentages and as medians (interquartile ranges) for skewed distribution
Correlations between carotid intima-media thickness value and associated risk factors
| Correlations with CIMT value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p value | ß | p value | |
| Age (years) |
|
|
|
|
| Current smoking | −0.003 | 0.933 |
|
|
| Heavy drinking |
|
| – | – |
| Low physical activity | 0.015 | 0.648 | – | – |
| Diabetes mellitus |
|
|
|
|
| Hypertension |
|
| – | – |
| Dyslipidemia | 0.044 | 0.168 | – | – |
| SBP (mmHg) | 0.077 | 0.050 | – | – |
| DBP (mmHg) | −0.006 | 0.887 | – | – |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) |
|
|
|
|
| Total cholesterol (mg/dL)a | 0.044 | 0.173 | – | – |
| LDL-C (mg/dL) |
|
|
|
|
| HOMA-IR indexa |
|
| – | – |
| eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2) | − |
| – | – |
| Metabolic syndrome |
|
| – | – |
Correlation coefficient (r) and regression coefficient (ß) were obtained by simple- and multiple linear regression analysis. Results in italics indicate statistical significance at the 0.05 level
CIMT carotid intima-media thickness, DBP diastolic blood pressure, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, SBP systolic blood pressure
aVariables with skewed distributions performed log-transformation
Fig. 1Carotid intima-media thickness according to obesity subtypes. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Only significant p values in CIMT differences among groups are presented. CIMT carotid intima-media thickness, MHNW metabolically healthy normal weight, MHO metabolically healthy, but obese, MANW metabolically abnormal, but normal weight, MAO metabolically abnormal obese
Odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals for carotid plaque according to subtypes of obesity
| MHNW | MHO | MANW | MAO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Presence of plaque | ||||
| Crude | 1 | 0.80 (0.55–1.16) | 1.41 (0.84–2.35) | 1.43 (0.99–2.06) |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.98 (0.65–1.46) | 0.96 (0.55–1.68) |
|
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.98 (0.65–1.47) | 0.91 (0.51–1.61) |
|
| Model 3 | 1 | 0.98 (0.64–1.48) | 0.95 (0.53–1.70) |
|
| Plaque, moderate risk | ||||
| Prevalence (%) | 10.8 | 12.0 | 15.0 | 15.4 |
| Crude | 1 | 1.05 (0.63–1.73) | 1.53 (0.76–3.09) | 1.58 (0.99–2.53) |
| Model 1 | 1 | 1.22 (0.72–2.04) | 1.12 (0.54–2.31) | 1.57 (0.97–2.54) |
| Model 2 | 1 | 1.16 (0.68–1.97) | 1.09 (0.51–2.33) |
|
| Model 3 | 1 | 1.28 (0.74–2.20) | 1.11 (0.50–2.44) |
|
| Plaque, high risk | ||||
| Prevalence (%) | 15.8 | 10.4 | 18.8 | 18.6 |
| Crude | 1 | 0.62 (0.38–1.02) | 1.32 (0.69–2.49) | 1.31 (0.86–1.99) |
| Model 1 | 1 | 0.77 (0.45–1.30) | 0.84 (0.42–1.67) | 1.33 (0.84–2.09) |
| Model 2 | 1 | 0.78 (0.45–1.34) | 0.89 (0.44–1.80) | 1.39 (0.87–2.19) |
| Model 3 | 1 | 0.84 (0.48–1.45) | 0.71 (0.33–1.50) | 1.25 (0.76–2.07) |
Values are expressed as odds ratio (95 % confidence interval). Model 1 adjustment for age, Model 2 adjustment for Model 1 + smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, Model 3 Model 2 + total cholesterol, LDL-C, HOMA-IR index and eGFR levels. Results in italics indicate statistical significance at the 0.05 level
MANW metabolically abnormal, but normal weight, MAO metabolically abnormal obese, MHO metabolically healthy, but obese, MHNW metabolically healthy normal weight
Fig. 2Adjusted odds ratios and 95 % confidence intervals of carotid atherosclerosis according to obesity subtypes. *Reference, **p value <0.05. MHNW metabolically healthy normal weight, MHO metabolically healthy, but obese, MANW metabolically abnormal, but normal weight, MAO metabolically abnormal obese
Fig. 3Prevalence of metabolic syndrome according to obesity. Obesity was defined as a body mass index ≥25.0 kg/m2. MetS metabolic syndrome, MHNW metabolically healthy normal weight, MHO metabolically healthy, but obese, MANW metabolically abnormal, but normal weight, MAO metabolically abnormal obese
Association between carotid atherosclerosis and metabolic syndrome according to obesity
| Increased CIMT | p value | Plaque | p value | Carotid atherosclerosis | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MHNW | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | – | |
| MANW | 0.74 (0.34–1.59) | 0.443 | 0.59 (0.31–1.16) | 0.127 | 0.70 (0.33–1.51) | 0.364 |
| MHO | 1 | 1 | – | 1 | – | |
| MAO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Values are expressed as odds ratio (95 % confidence interval). Data were analysed with adjusting for age, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, total cholesterol, LDL-C, HOMA-IR index and eGFR levels. Results in italics indicate statistical significance at the 0.05 level
CIMT carotid intima-media thickness, MANW metabolically abnormal, but normal weight, MAO metabolically abnormal obese, MHO metabolically healthy, but obese, MHNW metabolically healthy normal weight