PURPOSE: We sought to reexpress the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation for estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using serum creatinine (S(cr)) standardized to reference methods. METHODS: Serum specimens included creatinine reference materials prepared by the College of American Pathologists (CAP), traceable to primary reference material at the NIST, with assigned values traceable to isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS), a calibration panel prepared by the Cleveland Clinic Research Laboratory (CCRL), and frozen samples from the MDRD Study. Split specimens were measured at the CCRL using the Roche enzymatic and Beckman CX3 kinetic alkaline picrate assays. RESULTS: Roche enzymatic assay results on CAP samples were comparable to IDMS-assigned values. Beckman CX3 assay results in 2004-2005 were significantly higher than but highly correlated with simultaneous Roche enzymatic assay results (r(2) = 0.9994 on 40 CCRL samples) and showed minimal but significant upward drift from Beckman CX3 assay results during the MDRD Study in 1989-1991 (r(2) = 0.9987 in 253 samples). Combining these factors, standardized S(cr) = 0.95 x original MDRD Study S(cr). The reexpressed 4-variable MDRD Study equation for S(cr) (mg/dL) is GFR = 175 x standardized S(cr)(-1.154) x age(-0.203) x 1.212 (if black) x 0.742 (if female), and for S(cr) (micromol/L) is GFR = 30849 x standardized S(cr)(-1.154) x age(-0.203) x 1.212 (if black) x 0.742 (if female) [GFR in mL x min(-1) x (1.73 m(2))(-1)]. CONCLUSION: When the calibration of S(cr) methods is traceable to the S(cr) reference system, GFR should be estimated using the MDRD Study equation that has been reexpressed for standardized S(cr).
PURPOSE: We sought to reexpress the 4-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation for estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using serum creatinine (S(cr)) standardized to reference methods. METHODS: Serum specimens included creatinine reference materials prepared by the College of American Pathologists (CAP), traceable to primary reference material at the NIST, with assigned values traceable to isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS), a calibration panel prepared by the Cleveland Clinic Research Laboratory (CCRL), and frozen samples from the MDRD Study. Split specimens were measured at the CCRL using the Roche enzymatic and Beckman CX3 kinetic alkaline picrate assays. RESULTS: Roche enzymatic assay results on CAP samples were comparable to IDMS-assigned values. Beckman CX3 assay results in 2004-2005 were significantly higher than but highly correlated with simultaneous Roche enzymatic assay results (r(2) = 0.9994 on 40 CCRL samples) and showed minimal but significant upward drift from Beckman CX3 assay results during the MDRD Study in 1989-1991 (r(2) = 0.9987 in 253 samples). Combining these factors, standardized S(cr) = 0.95 x original MDRD Study S(cr). The reexpressed 4-variable MDRD Study equation for S(cr) (mg/dL) is GFR = 175 x standardized S(cr)(-1.154) x age(-0.203) x 1.212 (if black) x 0.742 (if female), and for S(cr) (micromol/L) is GFR = 30849 x standardized S(cr)(-1.154) x age(-0.203) x 1.212 (if black) x 0.742 (if female) [GFR in mL x min(-1) x (1.73 m(2))(-1)]. CONCLUSION: When the calibration of S(cr) methods is traceable to the S(cr) reference system, GFR should be estimated using the MDRD Study equation that has been reexpressed for standardized S(cr).
Authors: Ana C Ricardo; Wei Yang; Daohang Sha; Lawrence J Appel; Jing Chen; Marie Krousel-Wood; Anjella Manoharan; Susan Steigerwalt; Jackson Wright; Mahboob Rahman; Sylvia E Rosas; Milda Saunders; Kumar Sharma; Martha L Daviglus; James P Lash Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Yuen-Ting Diana Kwong; Lesley A Stevens; Elizabeth Selvin; Yaping Lucy Zhang; Tom Greene; Frederick Van Lente; Andrew S Levey; Josef Coresh Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Michael Haase; Prasad Devarajan; Anja Haase-Fielitz; Rinaldo Bellomo; Dinna N Cruz; Gebhard Wagener; Catherine D Krawczeski; Jay L Koyner; Patrick Murray; Michael Zappitelli; Stuart L Goldstein; Konstantinos Makris; Claudio Ronco; Johan Martensson; Claes-Roland Martling; Per Venge; Edward Siew; Lorraine B Ware; T Alp Ikizler; Peter R Mertens Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-04-26 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gregor Lindner; Carmen Andrea Pfortmueller; Christian Tasso Braun; Aristomenis Konstantinos Exadaktylos Journal: Intern Emerg Med Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 3.397
Authors: Andrew D Rule; Kent R Bailey; Gary L Schwartz; Sundeep Khosla; John C Lieske; L Joseph Melton Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2009-01-28 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Ayse L Mindikoglu; Antone R Opekun; William E Mitch; Laurence S Magder; Robert H Christenson; Thomas C Dowling; Matthew R Weir; Stephen L Seliger; Charles D Howell; Jean-Pierre Raufman; Abbas Rana; John A Goss; Saira A Khaderi; John M Vierling Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Daniel E Weiner; Keith Bartolomei; Tammy Scott; Lori Lyn Price; John L Griffith; Irwin Rosenberg; Andrew S Levey; Marshal F Folstein; Mark J Sarnak Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2008-12-12 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Csaba P Kovesdy; Kunihiro Matsushita; Yingying Sang; Nigel J Brunskill; Juan J Carrero; Gabriel Chodick; Takeshi Hasegawa; Hiddo L Heerspink; Atsushi Hirayama; Gijs W D Landman; Adeera Levin; Dorothea Nitsch; David C Wheeler; Josef Coresh; Stein I Hallan; Varda Shalev; Morgan E Grams Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Lisa B VanWagner; Samantha Montag; Lihui Zhao; Norrina B Allen; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Arighno Das; Anton I Skaro; Samuel Hohmann; John J Friedewald; Josh Levitsky Journal: Transplantation Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 4.939