Literature DB >> 11395035

Carotid and femoral ultrasound morphology screening and cardiovascular events in low risk subjects: a 10-year follow-up study (the CAFES-CAVE study(1)).

G Belcaro1, A N Nicolaides, G Ramaswami, M R Cesarone, M De Sanctis, L Incandela, P Ferrari, G Geroulakos, A Barsotti, M Griffin, S Dhanjil, M Sabetai, M Bucci, G Martines.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subclinical arteriosclerotic lesions at the carotid and femoral bifurcations may be related to the occurrence of future cardiovascular events and of occult arteriosclerotic coronary disease. B-mode ultrasound of carotid and femoral arteriosclerotic bifurcation lesions may provide a simple screening method to select asymptomatic subjects at risk of future events. METHODS AND
RESULTS: 13221 low-risk, healthy, asymptomatic individuals were included in a 10-year, prospective, follow-up based on carotid and femoral bifurcation morphology defined by B-mode ultrasound. Four classes were considered at inclusion (I: normal wall, II: wall thickening, III: non-stenosing plaques, IV: stenosing plaques). When 10000 subjects (75.6% of included subjects; 6055 males, 3945 females) completed the 10-year follow-up the study was concluded. At 10 years there were 10 events (out of 7989 subjects) in class I and 81 events in II (930 subjects; incidence=8.6%); 239 events were observed in class III (611 subjects; 39.28%) and 381 events (470 subjects; 81.06%) in IV; 61 deaths occurred in classes III+IV (1081 subjects) producing a death rate within these two classes of 5.5% (51 out of 61=81.5% in class IV). The increased event rates in classes III and IV were significant (log rank; P<0.02) in comparison with I and II.
CONCLUSIONS: Carotid and femoral morphology identified 2011 subjects (20.1% of the population) in classes II,III,IV including 98.6% of cardiovascular events and deaths in the following 10 years. A higher (P<0.05) rate of progression in classes III and IV in comparison with I and II was also observed. The ultrasound carotid and femoral classification was useful in selecting subjects at very low risk of cardiovascular events (class I), those at limited risk (class II) and a group at moderate risk (class III). A subpopulation at high risk of cardiovascular events (IV) was identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11395035     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9150(00)00665-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Atherosclerosis        ISSN: 0021-9150            Impact factor:   5.162


  49 in total

1.  Relationship between different cardiovascular risk scores and measures of subclinical atherosclerosis in an Indian population.

Authors:  Manish Bansal; Ravi R Kasliwal; Naresh Trehan
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2015-05-15

2.  Vascular biomarkers in the prediction of clinical cardiovascular disease: the Strong Heart Study.

Authors:  Mary J Roman; Jorge R Kizer; Lyle G Best; Elisa T Lee; Barbara V Howard; Nawar M Shara; Richard B Devereux
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Association between conventional risk factors and different ultrasound-based markers of atherosclerosis at carotid and femoral levels in a middle-aged population.

Authors:  Patrick Yerly; Nicolas Rodondi; Barathi Viswanathan; Walter Riesen; Pierre Vogt; Pascal Bovet
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Variations in Echogenicity in Carotid and Femoral Atherosclerotic Plaques with Pycnogenol + Centella Asiatica Supplementation.

Authors:  Gianni Belcaro; Umberto Cornelli
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2016-12-26

5.  [Prediction of coronary artery stenosis by measurement of total plaque area and thickness versus intima media thickness of the carotid artery].

Authors:  Ansgar Adams; Waldemar Bojara
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 1.443

6.  Chronotropic response during treadmill exercise and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis after adjusting for the calibrated SCORE risk classification: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine Liontou; Christina Chrysohoou; John Skoumas; Demosthenes B Panagiotakos; Christos Pitsavos; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  B-flow imaging estimation of carotid and femoral atherosclerotic plaques: vessel walls rheological damage or strong predictor of cardiovascular mortality in chronic dialysis patients.

Authors:  Petar Avramovski; Maja Avramovska; Aleksandar Sikole
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Quantitative assessment of carotid plaque morphology (geometry and tissue composition) using computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Matthew T Chrencik; Amir A Khan; Lauren Luther; Laila Anthony; John Yokemick; Jigar Patel; John D Sorkin; Siddhartha Sikdar; Brajesh K Lal
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 9.  Carotid plaque compared with intima-media thickness as a predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular disease.

Authors:  Stein Harald Johnsen; Ellisiv B Mathiesen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Differences in atherosclerosis according to area level socioeconomic deprivation: cross sectional, population based study.

Authors:  Kevin A Deans; Vladimir Bezlyak; Ian Ford; G David Batty; Harry Burns; Jonathan Cavanagh; Eric de Groot; Agnes McGinty; Keith Millar; Paul G Shiels; Carol Tannahill; Yoga N Velupillai; Naveed Sattar; Chris J Packard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.