Literature DB >> 26286029

VE-821, an ATR inhibitor, causes radiosensitization in human tumor cells irradiated with high LET radiation.

Hiroshi Fujisawa1,2, Nakako Izumi Nakajima3, Shigeaki Sunada4,5, Younghyun Lee6, Hirokazu Hirakawa7,8, Hirohiko Yajima9, Akira Fujimori10,11, Mitsuru Uesaka12,13, Ryuichi Okayasu14,15.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High linear energy transfer (LET) radiation such as carbon ion particles is successfully used for treatment of solid tumors. The reason why high LET radiation accomplishes greater tumor-killing than X-rays is still not completely understood. One factor would be the clustered or complex-type DNA damages. We previously reported that complex DNA double-strand breaks produced by high LET radiation enhanced DNA end resection, and this could lead to higher kinase activity of ATR protein recruited to RPA-coated single-stranded DNA. Although the effect of ATR inhibition on cells exposed to low LET gamma-rays has recently been reported, little is known regarding the effect of ATR inhibitor on cells treated with high LET radiation. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of the ATR inhibitor VE-821 in human tumor and normal cells irradiated with high LET carbon ions.
FINDINGS: HeLa, U2OS, and 1BR-hTERT (normal) cells were pre-treated with 1 μM VE-821 for 1 hour and irradiated with either high LET carbon ions or X-rays. Cell survival, cell cycle distribution, cell growth, and micronuclei formation were evaluated. VE-821 caused abrogation of G2/M checkpoint and forced irradiated cells to divide into daughter cells. We also found that carbon ions caused a higher number of multiple micronuclei than X-rays, leading to decreased cell survival in tumor cells when treated with VE-821, while the survival of irradiated normal cells were not significantly affected by this inhibitor.
CONCLUSIONS: ATR inhibitor would be an effective tumor radiosensitizer with carbon ion irradiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26286029      PMCID: PMC4554350          DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0464-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1748-717X            Impact factor:   3.481


Findings

Introduction

More recently the use of charged ion particles for cancer therapy has been drawing attention. Especially, heavy charged particles such as carbon ions are successfully used for treatment of solid tumors [1, 2]. However, the reason why heavy ion particles have more tumor-killing effects than X-rays is not completely understood. DNA damage produced by high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation is considered to be qualitatively different from that produced by low LET radiation such as X-rays or protons. High LET radiation produces complex clustered damage, and its complexity of DNA damage may affect cell cycle progression, DNA repair pathways, and cell death [3]. We previously reported that the complex DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) enhance DNA end resection during the repair process [4]. Other researchers showed that DNA end complexity determines the speed of DSB repair and the level of DSB end resection in G2 phase [5], and that cells irradiated with high LET Fe ions exhibited much greater G2/M accumulation than those with gamma-rays [6]. These results indicated that cells irradiated with high LET radiation show higher kinase activity of ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) protein, because ATR is recruited to replication protein A (RPA)-coated single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) [7]. ATR is a DNA damage response kinase that is activated by DNA damage or replication stress to regulate the genomic integrity [8]. One of the ATR functions includes a cell cycle checkpoint after DNA DSBs. After DNA ends are processed by exonuclease, ATR is recruited to ssDNA and phosphorylates chk1, leading to cell cycle arrest in G2/M. A recent report showed that VE-821, a novel ATR inhibitor, increased sensitivity to low LET radiation in pancreatic cancer cells [9]. This chemical is also known to inhibit chk1 phosphorylation [10, 11]. Although one report with another ATR inhibitor using normal cells irradiated with high LET radiation was recently published [12], no information with VE-821 using carbon ion irradiated tumor cells is available. Thus, we investigated the effect of VE-821 in tumor cells irradiated with carbon ions, and found that this drug is an effective radiosenstizer when combined with high LET radiation.

Materials and methods

Cell culture, IR irradiations, and drug treatments

HeLa, human cervical cancer cells, and U2OS, human osteosarcoma cells, were grown in MEM Eagle supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum plus antibiotics. HeLa cells were obtained from Cell Resource Center for Biomedical Research at Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, and U2OS cells were obtained from ATCC (cell line #: HTB-96), USA. 1BR-hTERT, normal human fibroblasts kindly supplied by Dr. Jeggo, Sussex University, UK, were grown in DMEM supplemented with 15 % fetal bovine serum and antibiotics. All cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified CO2 incubator. 290 MeV/u carbon ions (LET of 70 keV/μm) and X-rays by TITAN-320 (200 kV, 20 mA, Shimadzu) were used for irradiation. Exponentially growing cells were pre-incubated with 1 μM ATR inhibitor VE-821 (Axon Medchem) or with DMSO for 1 hour before irradiation.

Colony formation assay

At 8 or 24 hours after irradiation, cells were trypsinized, counted and plated onto cell culture dishes. After 12 days, cells were fixed in 100 % ethanol and stained with 0.1 % crystal violet. Colonies containing more than 50 cells were counted as surviving cells.

Cell cycle distribution and cell growth analysis

Cells were irradiated with 3 Gy of carbon ions or 6 Gy of X-rays and harvested at 12 and 24 hours after irradiation. They were fixed with 70 % cold ethanol and stained with propidium iodide (PI) (50 μg/ml in PBS containing 200 μg/ml RNase) for 30 minutes. Then, they were analyzed on a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson) flow cytometer. For cell growth analysis, the number of cells was counted by Coulter Counter (Beckman Coulter) immediately and 1 day after irradiation.

Micronucleus assay

Immediately after irradiation of U2OS cells with 1 Gy of carbon ions or 1 or 2 Gy of X-rays, and 1BR-hTERT cells with 2 Gy of X-rays, 2 μg/ml of cytochalasin-B (Cyt-B) was added and cells were incubated for 24 hours. They were then fixed in cold methanol for 20 minutes, permeabilized in 0.5 % Triton X-100 for 10 minutes on ice, and blocked in 3 % bovine serum albumin for 20 minutes at room temperature. They were incubated with anti-β-actin conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 antibody (Cell Signaling) for 1 hour, and mounted in ProLong Gold Antifade with DAPI (Molecular Probe).

Results

The ATR inhibitor VE-821 radiosensitized human tumor cells irradiated with high LET carbon ions

To assess ATR inhibition on radiation sensitivity, cellular survivals were acquired using a colony formation assay. Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) based on D10 values, at a dose resulting in one decade of cell killing, was calculated as X-ray dose leading to 0.1 survival divided by carbon dose leading to 0.1 survival (Table 1).
Table 1

D10 with DMSO and RBE

8 h24 h
D10 DMSO (Gy)RBED10 DMSO (Gy)RBE
X-rayCarbonX-rayCarbon
HeLa5.472.672.056.662.622.54
U20S3.811.642.314.011.642.45
1BR-hTERT3.671.901.933.311.791.85
D10 with DMSO and RBE With 8-hour treatment of VE-821, HeLa cells were clearly radiosensitized both with carbon ion and X-ray irradiation, while normal 1BR-hTERT cells were not affected (Fig. 1a). U2OS tumor cells were slightly affected by VE-821 with 8-hour treatment. Sensitizing enhancement ratios (SER) on the D10 value in carbon ion irradiation are shown in Table 2. With 24-hour treatment of VE-821, HeLa and U2OS cells were significantly radiosensitized by both kinds of radiation, while little was observed in irradiated 1BR-hTERT cells by the inhibitor (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1

The ATR inhibitor VE-821 radiosensitized human tumor cells irradiated with high LET carbon ions. HeLa, U2OS, and 1BR-hTERT cells were pre-treated with 1 μM VE-821 or DMSO for 1 hour before irradiation, and were irradiated with 1, 2, 3 Gy of carbon ions or 2, 4, 6 Gy of X-rays. At 8 hours (a) or 24 hours (b) after irradiation, cells were plated on cell culture dishes to form colonies. Colonies containing more than 50 cells were counted as surviving cells. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least three independent experiments. Curves with *show statistically significant data (p <0.05) when compared with control curves with DMSO only

Table 2

D10 withVE-821 and SER

8 h24 h
D10 VE-821 (Gy)SERD10 VE-821 (Gy)SER
X-rayCarbonX-rayCarbonX-rayCarbonX-rayCarbon
HeLa4.521.961.211.363.451.501.931.74
U20S3.251.281.171.292.250.951.781.72
1BR-hTERT3.381.781.081.073.051.461.091.23
The ATR inhibitor VE-821 radiosensitized human tumor cells irradiated with high LET carbon ions. HeLa, U2OS, and 1BR-hTERT cells were pre-treated with 1 μM VE-821 or DMSO for 1 hour before irradiation, and were irradiated with 1, 2, 3 Gy of carbon ions or 2, 4, 6 Gy of X-rays. At 8 hours (a) or 24 hours (b) after irradiation, cells were plated on cell culture dishes to form colonies. Colonies containing more than 50 cells were counted as surviving cells. Error bars represent standard error of the mean (SEM) of at least three independent experiments. Curves with *show statistically significant data (p <0.05) when compared with control curves with DMSO only D10 withVE-821 and SER

VE-821 abrogated carbon ion-induced G2/M cell cycle arrest

To investigate the effect of VE-821 on the cell cycle checkpoint after irradiation, we examined the cell cycle distribution by flow cytometer. Following carbon ion irradiation, all three cell lines showed significant G2/M checkpoint arrest at 12 hours after irradiation. However, the combination with VE-821 decreased the percentage of G2/M phase, indicating abrogation of G2/M cell cycle arrest. At 24 hours after irradiation, G2/M arrest continued in cells without the drug treatment, while cells with the combination treatment showed high percentages of G1 cells, the level of which was similar to, or even higher than non-irradiated control (Fig. 2a). Irradiated 1BR-hTERT cells showed a decrease in the percentage of S phase and an abrogation of G2/M cell cycle arrest (Additional file 1: Figure S1). There were no significant differences in VE-821 effect between the results with 3 Gy carbon ions and with 6 Gy X-rays, reflecting an RBE value of about 2 for carbon ions. Cellular growth data seem to indicate that VE-821 forced cells to divide into daughter cells (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 2

VE-821 abrogated carbon ion-induced G2/M cell cycle arrest in tumor cells. HeLa and U2OS cells were pre-treated with 1 μM VE-821 or DMSO for 1 hour before irradiation, and were irradiated with 3 Gy of carbon ions or 6 Gy of X-rays. a Cells were harvested at 12 and 24 hours after irradiation and their cell cycle distributions were analyzed by flow cytometry. b The number of cells was counted immediately after and 1 day after irradiation. The relative cell number was calculated as follows: cell number after 1 day was divided by cell number immediately after irradiation. Error bars represent SEM of at least three independent experiments

VE-821 abrogated carbon ion-induced G2/M cell cycle arrest in tumor cells. HeLa and U2OS cells were pre-treated with 1 μM VE-821 or DMSO for 1 hour before irradiation, and were irradiated with 3 Gy of carbon ions or 6 Gy of X-rays. a Cells were harvested at 12 and 24 hours after irradiation and their cell cycle distributions were analyzed by flow cytometry. b The number of cells was counted immediately after and 1 day after irradiation. The relative cell number was calculated as follows: cell number after 1 day was divided by cell number immediately after irradiation. Error bars represent SEM of at least three independent experiments

Carbon ions with VE-821 caused multiple micronuclei formation

A micronucleus assay of U2OS cells was conducted to investigate genomic toxicity when treated with VE-821. In carbon ion-irradiated cells with VE-821, the average number of micronuclei per binucleated (BN) cell was 3.36 which is about 2.32 times higher than that treated with DMSO control. In X-ray-irradiated cells with VE-821, the average number was 1.38 and 2.44 at a dose of 1 and 2 Gy, respectively, 2.39 times and 1.86 times higher, respectively, than that with DMSO control (Fig. 3a, 3b). From the results of the percentage of BN cells with micronuclei, a substantial number of BN cells with multiple micronuclei were observed in the combination of VE-821 and irradiation for U2OS tumor cells (Fig. 3c). We also measured micronuclei formation using normal 1BR-hTERT cells. As indicated in Fig. 3d, the micronuclei formation is significantly lower in irradiated normal cells with and without VE-821 treatment when compared with U2OS tumor cells.
Fig. 3

Carbon ions with VE-821 caused multiple micronuclei formation in tumor cells. a U2OS cells were pre-treated with 1 μM VE-821 or DMSO for 1 hour before irradiation, and were irradiated with 1 Gy of carbon ions, or 1 or 2 Gy of X-rays. They were treated with cytochalasin-B (2 μg/ml) immediately after irradiation and incubated for 24 hours. Nucleus and β-actin were stained with DAPI and anti-β-actin antibody. 500 binucleated (BN) cells were scored each time, and this was repeated three times (1500 BN cells were scored in total). Asterisk(s) in this figure means statistically significant (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01) when the data under the bar were compared. b Microscopic images of U2OS cells irradiated with 1 Gy of carbon ions and VE-821. Cellular nuclei were stained with DAPI, and β-actin was stained with anti-β-actin conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 antibody to detect the cellular surfaces. c Percentages of BN cells with micronuclei were shown as a function of micronucleus number. d The number of micronuclei in a BN cell was counted in U2OS and 1BR-hTERT cells with the combination of 2 Gy of X-ray irradiation and DMSO or VE-821 treatment. Error bars represent SEM of at least three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate the same meaning as in Fig. 3a

Carbon ions with VE-821 caused multiple micronuclei formation in tumor cells. a U2OS cells were pre-treated with 1 μM VE-821 or DMSO for 1 hour before irradiation, and were irradiated with 1 Gy of carbon ions, or 1 or 2 Gy of X-rays. They were treated with cytochalasin-B (2 μg/ml) immediately after irradiation and incubated for 24 hours. Nucleus and β-actin were stained with DAPI and anti-β-actin antibody. 500 binucleated (BN) cells were scored each time, and this was repeated three times (1500 BN cells were scored in total). Asterisk(s) in this figure means statistically significant (*: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01) when the data under the bar were compared. b Microscopic images of U2OS cells irradiated with 1 Gy of carbon ions and VE-821. Cellular nuclei were stained with DAPI, and β-actin was stained with anti-β-actin conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 antibody to detect the cellular surfaces. c Percentages of BN cells with micronuclei were shown as a function of micronucleus number. d The number of micronuclei in a BN cell was counted in U2OS and 1BR-hTERT cells with the combination of 2 Gy of X-ray irradiation and DMSO or VE-821 treatment. Error bars represent SEM of at least three independent experiments. Asterisks indicate the same meaning as in Fig. 3a

Discussion

In this report we have shown for the first time that pre-treatment of the ATR inhibitor VE-821 clearly enhanced the effect of carbon ion irradiation in human tumor cells. In contrast, little radiosensitization was observed in normal human cells. Xue et al. [12] showed some radio-sensitization in different normal human cell line (GM0639) with carbon ions using another ATR inhibitor NU6027, but the concentration of the drug is 10 μM which is ten times higher than this study with VE-821. It appears that much lower concentration of VE-821 provides desirable differential effect between normal and tumor cells. In cell cycle and growth analysis, we demonstrated that VE-821 abrogated G2/M cell cycle arrest, forcing cells to enter mitotic stage. Differences among the three cell lines were observed in the percentage of G1 phase at 12 hours after irradiation. The percentage of G1 HeLa cells after irradiation was less than those of U2OS and 1BR-hTERT. This result may be related to the p53 protein status. U2OS and 1BR-hTERT cells, expressing normal wild-type p53 protein, manifest both G1/S and G2/M checkpoint arrest, while HeLa has no or little G1/S checkpoint mechanism because HeLa cells express p53, but it is degraded by E6 proteins [13]. The cell growth data at 1 day after irradiation also showed little cell cycle arrest when treated with VE-821. The effects of VE-821 on low LET radiation [11] as well as VE-821 on Gemcitabine treatment have been reported [9]. Effectiveness of this drug under hypoxic condition was also shown using 3-dimensional spheroids [14]. In our study SER depended on the treatment time of ATR inhibitor after irradiation. Much higher SER values were obtained at 24 hour than 8 hour post-irradiation; this trend is more pronounced in tumor cells than normal cells. By micronucleus analysis, similar numbers of micronuclei were observed for 1 Gy of carbon-irradiated cells and 2 Gy X-ray-irradiated cells. This might reflect an RBE value of carbon ions of around 2. Judging from the comparison of micronuclei formation between tumor and normal cells in Fig. 3d, it seems that tumor cells are much more genomically unstable, leading to higher number of chromosome fragmentations than normal cells, especially when irradiated cells are forced to advance from G2 to mitotic stage by VE-821 treatment. This manifests in the differences in degree of radio-sensitization between tumor and normal cells in Fig. 1, where only tumor cells were significantly radio-sensitized by VE-821. When ATR activity was inhibited, high LET radiation caused more multiple micronuclei in the BN tumor cells. Our studies indicated that the combination of ATR inhibitor and high LET carbon irradiation provided very effective tumor control. Thus, ATR inhibition would be a good alternative for the combined treatment with low and high LET radiation.
  14 in total

1.  Selective killing of ATM- or p53-deficient cancer cells through inhibition of ATR.

Authors:  Philip M Reaper; Matthew R Griffiths; Joanna M Long; Jean-Damien Charrier; Somhairle Maccormick; Peter A Charlton; Julian M C Golec; John R Pollard
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 2.  The human papillomavirus E6 protein and its contribution to malignant progression.

Authors:  F Mantovani; L Banks
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2001-11-26       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Unrepaired clustered DNA lesions induce chromosome breakage in human cells.

Authors:  Aroumougame Asaithamby; Burong Hu; David J Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Repair of DNA damage induced by accelerated heavy ions--a mini review.

Authors:  Ryuichi Okayasu
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2011-10-23       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  The novel ATR inhibitor VE-821 increases sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to radiation and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Remko Prevo; Emmanouil Fokas; Philip M Reaper; Peter A Charlton; John R Pollard; W Gillies McKenna; Ruth J Muschel; Thomas B Brunner
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.742

6.  Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes.

Authors:  Lee Zou; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  ATR: a master conductor of cellular responses to DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Rachel Litman Flynn; Lee Zou
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 8.  Charged particles in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Factors determining DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice in G2 phase.

Authors:  Atsushi Shibata; Sandro Conrad; Julie Birraux; Verena Geuting; Olivia Barton; Amani Ismail; Andreas Kakarougkas; Katheryn Meek; Gisela Taucher-Scholz; Markus Löbrich; Penny A Jeggo
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Targeting radiation-resistant hypoxic tumour cells through ATR inhibition.

Authors:  I M Pires; M M Olcina; S Anbalagan; J R Pollard; P M Reaper; P A Charlton; W G McKenna; E M Hammond
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Strategies to Enhance Radiosensitivity to Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Younghyun Lee; Ryuichi Okayasu
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 2.  ATR/CHK1 inhibitors and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Zhaojun Qiu; Nancy L Oleinick; Junran Zhang
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 6.280

Review 3.  Emerging targets for radioprotection and radiosensitization in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Sumit Kumar; Rajnish Kumar Singh; Ramovatar Meena
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2016-06-19

4.  Core-Shell Silver/Polymeric Nanoparticles-Based Combinatorial Therapy against Breast Cancer In-vitro.

Authors:  Nancy M Elbaz; Laila Ziko; Rania Siam; Wael Mamdouh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Combined ATR and DNA-PK Inhibition Radiosensitizes Tumor Cells Independently of Their p53 Status.

Authors:  Hind Hafsi; Magnus T Dillon; Holly E Barker; Joan N Kyula; Ulrike Schick; James T Paget; Henry G Smith; Malin Pedersen; Martin McLaughlin; Kevin J Harrington
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Selective human inhibitors of ATR and ATM render Leishmania major promastigotes sensitive to oxidative damage.

Authors:  Raíssa Bernardes da Silva; Carlos Renato Machado; Aldo Rogelis Aquiles Rodrigues; André Luiz Pedrosa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Small Molecules Identified from a Quantitative Drug Combinational Screen Resensitize Cisplatin's Response in Drug-Resistant Ovarian Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Ni Sima; Wei Sun; Kirill Gorshkov; Min Shen; Wei Huang; Wenge Zhu; Xing Xie; Wei Zheng; Xiaodong Cheng
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 4.243

8.  Overcoming radioresistance in WiDr cells with heavy ion irradiation and radiosensitization by 2-deoxyglucose with photon irradiation.

Authors:  Felix Christian Hasse; Stefan Alexander Koerber; Elena Sophie Prigge; Jakob Liermann; Magnus von Knebel Doeberitz; Juergen Debus; Florian Sterzing
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-08-20

9.  DNA damage response signaling pathways and targets for radiotherapy sensitization in cancer.

Authors:  Rui-Xue Huang; Ping-Kun Zhou
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2020-05-01

10.  Distinct genetic control of homologous recombination repair of Cas9-induced double-strand breaks, nicks and paired nicks.

Authors:  Lianne E M Vriend; Rohit Prakash; Chun-Chin Chen; Fabio Vanoli; Francesca Cavallo; Yu Zhang; Maria Jasin; Przemek M Krawczyk
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.