Literature DB >> 23934411

Inhibition of ATR kinase with the selective inhibitor VE-821 results in radiosensitization of cells of promyelocytic leukaemia (HL-60).

Jiřina Vávrová1, Lenka Zárybnická, Emilie Lukášová, Martina Řezáčová, Eva Novotná, Zuzana Sinkorová, Aleš Tichý, Jaroslav Pejchal, Kamila Durišová.   

Abstract

We compared the effects of inhibitors of kinases ATM (KU55933) and ATR (VE-821) (incubated for 30 min before irradiation) on the radiosensitization of human promyelocyte leukaemia cells (HL-60), lacking functional protein p53. VE-821 reduces phosphorylation of check-point kinase 1 at serine 345, and KU55933 reduces phosphorylation of check-point kinase 2 on threonine 68 as assayed 4 h after irradiation by the dose of 6 Gy. Within 24 h after gamma-irradiation with a dose of 3 Gy, the cells accumulated in the G2 phase (67 %) and the number of cells in S phase decreased. KU55933 (10 μM) did not affect the accumulation of cells in G2 phase and did not affect the decrease in the number of cells in S phase after irradiation. VE-821 (2 and 10 μM) reduced the number of irradiated cells in the G2 phase to the level of non-irradiated cells and increased the number of irradiated cells in S phase, compared to irradiated cells not treated with inhibitors. In the 144 h interval after irradiation with 3 Gy, there was a considerable induction of apoptosis in the VE-821 group (10 μM). The repair of the radiation damage, as observed 72 h after irradiation, was more rapid in the group exposed solely to irradiation and in the group treated with KU55933 (80 and 77 % of cells, respectively, were free of DSBs), whereas in the group incubated with 10 μM VE-821, there were only 61 % of cells free of DSBs. The inhibition of kinase ATR with its specific inhibitor VE-821 resulted in a more pronounced radiosensitizing effect in HL-60 cells as compared to the inhibition of kinase ATM with the inhibitor KU55933. In contrast to KU55933, the VE-821 treatment prevented HL-60 cells from undergoing G2 cell cycle arrest. Taken together, we conclude that the ATR kinase inhibition offers a new possibility of radiosensitization of tumour cells lacking functional protein p53.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23934411     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-013-0486-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  25 in total

1.  High-resolution cytometry of FISH dots in interphase cell nuclei.

Authors:  M Kozubek; S Kozubek; E Lukásová; A Marecková; E Bártová; M Skalníková; A Jergová
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1999-08-01

2.  Direct inhibition of the signaling functions of the mammalian target of rapamycin by the phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, wortmannin and LY294002.

Authors:  G J Brunn; J Williams; C Sabers; G Wiederrecht; J C Lawrence; R T Abraham
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  DNA damage triggers a prolonged p53-dependent G1 arrest and long-term induction of Cip1 in normal human fibroblasts.

Authors:  A Di Leonardo; S P Linke; K Clarkin; G M Wahl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1994-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  The novel ATR inhibitor VE-821 increases sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cells to radiation and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Remko Prevo; Emmanouil Fokas; Philip M Reaper; Peter A Charlton; John R Pollard; W Gillies McKenna; Ruth J Muschel; Thomas B Brunner
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 4.742

5.  Caffeine induces a second wave of apoptosis after low dose-rate gamma radiation of HL-60 cells.

Authors:  Jirina Vávrová; Martina Mareková-Rezácová; Doris Vokurková; Sylva Szkanderová; Jan Psutka
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2003-10-21       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation.

Authors:  Christopher J Bakkenist; Michael B Kastan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Irreversible chromosome damage accumulates rapidly in the absence of ATM kinase activity.

Authors:  Jason S White; Serah Choi; Christopher J Bakkenist
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 8.  New insights into checkpoint kinase 1 in the DNA damage response signaling network.

Authors:  Yun Dai; Steven Grant
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Targeting the DNA double strand break repair machinery in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Fadhel S Shaheen; Pawel Znojek; Ann Fisher; Martin Webster; Ruth Plummer; Luke Gaughan; Graeme C M Smith; Hing Y Leung; Nicola J Curtin; Craig N Robson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Targeting ATR in vivo using the novel inhibitor VE-822 results in selective sensitization of pancreatic tumors to radiation.

Authors:  E Fokas; R Prevo; J R Pollard; P M Reaper; P A Charlton; B Cornelissen; K A Vallis; E M Hammond; M M Olcina; W Gillies McKenna; R J Muschel; T B Brunner
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 8.469

View more
  14 in total

1.  Pharmacologic inhibition of ATR and ATM offers clinically important distinctions to enhancing platinum or radiation response in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer cells.

Authors:  Pang-ning Teng; Nicholas W Bateman; Kathleen M Darcy; Chad A Hamilton; George Larry Maxwell; Christopher J Bakkenist; Thomas P Conrads
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Src family kinases promote silencing of ATR-Chk1 signaling in termination of DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Yasunori Fukumoto; Mariko Morii; Takahito Miura; Sho Kubota; Kenichi Ishibashi; Takuya Honda; Aya Okamoto; Noritaka Yamaguchi; Atsushi Iwama; Yuji Nakayama; Naoto Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Molecular Pathways: Targeting ATR in Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Larry M Karnitz; Lee Zou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  ATR Kinase Inhibition Protects Non-cycling Cells from the Lethal Effects of DNA Damage and Transcription Stress.

Authors:  Michael G Kemp; Aziz Sancar
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  ATR/CHK1 inhibitors and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Zhaojun Qiu; Nancy L Oleinick; Junran Zhang
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Chk1 phosphorylated at serine345 is a predictor of early local recurrence and radio-resistance in breast cancer.

Authors:  Nouf Alsubhi; Fiona Middleton; Tarek M A Abdel-Fatah; Peter Stephens; Rachel Doherty; Arvind Arora; Paul M Moseley; Stephen Y T Chan; Mohammed A Aleskandarany; Andrew R Green; Emad A Rakha; Ian O Ellis; Stewart G Martin; Nicola J Curtin; Srinivasan Madhusudan
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 7.  Targeting the Checkpoint to Kill Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Jan Benada; Libor Macurek
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2015-08-18

8.  Radiosensitization of human leukemic HL-60 cells by ATR kinase inhibitor (VE-821): phosphoproteomic analysis.

Authors:  Barbora Šalovská; Ivo Fabrik; Kamila Ďurišová; Marek Link; Jiřina Vávrová; Martina Řezáčová; Aleš Tichý
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  VE-821, an ATR inhibitor, causes radiosensitization in human tumor cells irradiated with high LET radiation.

Authors:  Hiroshi Fujisawa; Nakako Izumi Nakajima; Shigeaki Sunada; Younghyun Lee; Hirokazu Hirakawa; Hirohiko Yajima; Akira Fujimori; Mitsuru Uesaka; Ryuichi Okayasu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Critical role of lysine 134 methylation on histone H2AX for γ-H2AX production and DNA repair.

Authors:  Kenbun Sone; Lianhua Piao; Makoto Nakakido; Koji Ueda; Thomas Jenuwein; Yusuke Nakamura; Ryuji Hamamoto
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.