Literature DB >> 24041488

The complexity of DNA double strand breaks is a critical factor enhancing end-resection.

Hirohiko Yajima1, Hiroshi Fujisawa, Nakako Izumi Nakajima, Hirokazu Hirakawa, Penelope A Jeggo, Ryuichi Okayasu, Akira Fujimori.   

Abstract

DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) induced by ionizing radiation (IR) are deleterious damages. Two major pathways repair DSBs in human cells, DNA non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homologous recombination (HR). It has been suggested that the balance between the two repair pathways varies depending on the chromatin structure surrounding the damage site and/or the complexity of damage at the DNA break ends. Heavy ion radiation is known to induce complex-type DSBs, and the efficiency of NHEJ in repairing these DSBs was shown to be diminished. Taking advantage of the ability of high linear energy transfer (LET) radiation to produce complex DSBs effectively, we investigated how the complexity of DSB end structure influences DNA damage responses. An early step in HR is the generation of 3'-single strand DNA (SSD) via a process of DNA end resection that requires CtIP. To assess this process, we analyzed the level of phosphorylated CtIP, as well as RPA phosphorylation and focus formation, which occur on the exposed SSD. We show that complex DSBs efficiently activate DNA end resection. After heavy ion beam irradiation, resection signals appear both in the vicinity of heterochromatic areas, which is also observed after X-irradiation, and additionally in euchromatic areas. Consequently, ~85% of complex DSBs are subjected to resection in heavy ion particle tracks. Furthermore, around 20-40% of G1 cells exhibit resection signals. Taken together, our observations reveal that the complexity of DSB ends is a critical factor regulating the choice of DSB repair pathway and drastically alters the balance toward resection-mediated rejoining. As demonstrated here, studies on DNA damage responses induced by heavy ion radiation provide an important tool to shed light on mechanisms regulating DNA end resection.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole.; ATM; CENP-F; CPT; CtIP; DAPI; DNA double strand breaks; DNA end resection; DSBs; HR; IR; LET; MEF; MMEJ; PIKK; RBE; RPA; camptothecin; centromere protein F; complex DNA damage structure; homologous recombination; ionizing radiation; linear energy transfer; micro homology-mediated end joining; mouse embryonic fibroblast; phosphatidyl inositol 3′ kinase-related kinase; relative biological effectiveness; replication protein A

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24041488     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2013.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  35 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.

Authors:  Wendy J Cannan; David S Pederson
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.384

2.  Organization and dynamics of the nonhomologous end-joining machinery during DNA double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Dylan A Reid; Sarah Keegan; Alejandra Leo-Macias; Go Watanabe; Natasha T Strande; Howard H Chang; Betul Akgol Oksuz; David Fenyo; Michael R Lieber; Dale A Ramsden; Eli Rothenberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Combined inhibition of Wee1 and PARP1/2 for radiosensitization in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  David Karnak; Carl G Engelke; Leslie A Parsels; Tasneem Kausar; Dongping Wei; Jordan R Robertson; Katherine B Marsh; Mary A Davis; Lili Zhao; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence; Meredith A Morgan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 4.  DNA Repair Processes and Checkpoint Pathways in Human Cells Exposed to Heavy Ion Beams.

Authors:  Hirohiko Yajima; Lian Xue
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2016-02-09

Review 5.  Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure.

Authors:  Deepa M Sridharan; Aroumougame Asaithamby; Steve R Blattnig; Sylvain V Costes; Paul W Doetsch; William S Dynan; Philip Hahnfeldt; Lynn Hlatky; Yared Kidane; Amy Kronenberg; Mamta D Naidu; Leif E Peterson; Ianik Plante; Artem L Ponomarev; Janapriya Saha; Antoine M Snijders; Kalayarasan Srinivasan; Jonathan Tang; Erica Werner; Janice M Pluth
Journal:  Life Sci Space Res (Amst)       Date:  2016-05-21

6.  Low- and High-LET Ionizing Radiation Induces Delayed Homologous Recombination that Persists for Two Weeks before Resolving.

Authors:  Christopher P Allen; Hirokazu Hirakawa; Nakako Izumi Nakajima; Sophia Moore; Jingyi Nie; Neelam Sharma; Mayumi Sugiura; Yuko Hoki; Ryoko Araki; Masumi Abe; Ryuichi Okayasu; Akira Fujimori; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 7.  Strategies to Enhance Radiosensitivity to Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Younghyun Lee; Ryuichi Okayasu
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

8.  Investigation of the relative biological effectiveness and uniform isobiological killing effects of irradiation with a clinical carbon SOBP beam on DNA repair deficient CHO cells.

Authors:  Shigeaki Sunada; Ian M Cartwright; Hirokazu Hirakawa; Akira Fujimori; Mitsuru Uesaka; Takamitsu A Kato
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  DNA end resection is needed for the repair of complex lesions in G1-phase human cells.

Authors:  Nicole B Averbeck; Oliver Ringel; Maren Herrlitz; Burkhard Jakob; Marco Durante; Gisela Taucher-Scholz
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  The purine scaffold Hsp90 inhibitor PU-H71 sensitizes cancer cells to heavy ion radiation by inhibiting DNA repair by homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining.

Authors:  Younghyun Lee; Huizi Keiko Li; Aya Masaoka; Shigeaki Sunada; Hirokazu Hirakawa; Akira Fujimori; Jac A Nickoloff; Ryuichi Okayasu
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 6.280

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.