Literature DB >> 26283016

A clinically useful simplified blastocyst grading system.

Alison Richardson1, Sophie Brearley2, Saran Ahitan2, Sarah Chamberlain2, Tracey Davey2, Lyndsey Zujovic2, James Hopkisson2, Bruce Campbell3, Nick Raine-Fenning4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether a new simplified blastocyst grading system (A: fully expanded, clear inner cell mass, cohesive trophectoderm; B: not yet expanded, clear inner cell mass, cohesive trophectoderm; C: small inner cell mass ± irregular trophectoderm ± excluded/degenerate cells) was clinically useful. All day-5 single embryo transfers between 15 June 2009 and 29 June 2012 were reviewed. Implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were related to embryo quality. Five embryologists were asked to grade and decide the clinical fate of 80 images of day-5 embryos on two occasions 4-6 weeks apart. Implantation, clinical pregnancy and live birth rates decreased with deteriorating embryo quality. A highly significant (P < 0.01) difference was observed between the groups. Inter-observer agreement was substantial for grade allocation (K = 0.63) and clinical decision-making (K = 0.66). Intra-observer agreement ranged from substantial (K = 0.71) to almost perfect (K = 0.88) for grade allocation, and was almost perfect for clinical fate determination (K ≥ 0.84). This grading system is quick and easy to use, effectively predicts IVF outcome and has levels of agreement similar to, if not better than, those associated with more complex grading systems.
Copyright © 2015 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blastocyst; grading; variability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26283016     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  8 in total

1.  Do patient factors influence embryologists' decisions to freeze borderline blastocysts?

Authors:  T Burns; E R Hammond; L Cree; D E Morbeck; N S Consedine
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Blastocyst classification systems used in Latin America: is a consensus possible?

Authors:  Tatiana Puga-Torres; Xavier Blum-Rojas; Medardo Blum-Narváez
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2017-09-01

3.  The Valuable Reference of Live Birth Rate in the Single Vitrified-Warmed BB/BC/CB Blastocyst Transfer: The Cleavage-Stage Embryo Quality and Embryo Development Speed.

Authors:  Xi Shen; Hui Long; Hongyuan Gao; Wenya Guo; Yating Xie; Di Chen; Yanyan Cong; Yun Wang; Dongying Li; Jiqiang Si; Leiwen Zhao; Qifeng Lyu; Yanping Kuang; Li Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 4.  Methods for assessing the quality of mammalian embryos: How far we are from the gold standard?

Authors:  José C Rocha; Felipe Passalia; Felipe D Matos; Marc P Maserati; Mayra F Alves; Tamie G de Almeida; Bruna L Cardoso; Andrea C Basso; Marcelo F G Nogueira
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2016-08-01

5.  A Method Based on Artificial Intelligence To Fully Automatize The Evaluation of Bovine Blastocyst Images.

Authors:  José Celso Rocha; Felipe José Passalia; Felipe Delestro Matos; Maria Beatriz Takahashi; Diego de Souza Ciniciato; Marc Peter Maserati; Mayra Fernanda Alves; Tamie Guibu de Almeida; Bruna Lopes Cardoso; Andrea Cristina Basso; Marcelo Fábio Gouveia Nogueira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Blastocyst score, a blastocyst quality ranking tool, is a predictor of blastocyst ploidy and implantation potential.

Authors:  Qiansheng Zhan; E T Sierra; Jonas Malmsten; Zhen Ye; Zev Rosenwaks; Nikica Zaninovic
Journal:  F S Rep       Date:  2020-09-28

7.  Identification of extracellular vesicles and characterization of miRNA expression profiles in human blastocoel fluid.

Authors:  R Battaglia; S Palini; M E Vento; A La Ferlita; M J Lo Faro; E Caroppo; P Borzì; L Falzone; D Barbagallo; M Ragusa; M Scalia; G D'Amato; P Scollo; P Musumeci; M Purrello; E Gravotta; C Di Pietro
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Associations between a new day 4 embryo grading system and implantation rates in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles.

Authors:  Hongxing Li; Xiaojuan Xu; Yuanxue Jing; Lin Liu; Yiqing Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.