Literature DB >> 28837032

Blastocyst classification systems used in Latin America: is a consensus possible?

Tatiana Puga-Torres1, Xavier Blum-Rojas1, Medardo Blum-Narváez1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify different blastocyst classification systems used by embryologists in Latin American countries and evaluate the possibility of establishing a consensus among these countries.
METHODS: An E-mail survey was carried out through the Latin American Network of Assisted Reproduction (REDLARA) aimed at embryologists from assisted reproduction centers in Latin countries.
RESULTS: Sixty surveys were collected from 12 Latin American countries, of which 66.7% had >10years of professional practice as embryologists. Seven different blastocyst classification systems were reported, of which 5 have previously been described in the literature.
CONCLUSION: Although the group of embryologists surveyed use different blastocyst classification systems, most in this group consider that the embryo score system should be unified in their countries as well as in the region.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Latin America; blastocyst; consensus

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28837032      PMCID: PMC5574645          DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod        ISSN: 1517-5693


  14 in total

1.  Standardization of grading embryo morphology.

Authors:  Catherine Racowsky; Michael Vernon; Jacob Mayer; G David Ball; Barry Behr; Kimball O Pomeroy; David Wininger; William Gibbons; Joseph Conaghan; Judy E Stern
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Blastocyst quality scoring based on morphologic grading correlates with cell number.

Authors:  Koji Matsuura; Nobuyoshi Hayashi; Chisato Takiue; Rei Hirata; Toshihiro Habara; Keiji Naruse
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting.

Authors: 
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Best practices of ASRM and ESHRE: a journey through reproductive medicine.

Authors:  Luca Gianaroli; Catherine Racowsky; Joep Geraedts; Marcelle Cedars; Antonis Makrigiannakis; Roger A Lobo
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Randomized comparison of two different blastocyst grading systems.

Authors:  Basak Balaban; Kayhan Yakin; Bulent Urman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer.

Authors:  D K Gardner; M Lane; J Stevens; T Schlenker; W B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  The simplified SART embryo scoring system is highly correlated to implantation and live birth in single blastocyst transfers.

Authors:  Ryan J Heitmann; Micah J Hill; Kevin S Richter; Alan H DeCherney; Eric A Widra
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Trophectoderm grade predicts outcomes of single-blastocyst transfers.

Authors:  Micah J Hill; Kevin S Richter; Ryan J Heitmann; James R Graham; Michael J Tucker; Alan H DeCherney; Paulette E Browne; Eric D Levens
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Single blastocyst transfer: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  David K Gardner; Eric Surrey; Debra Minjarez; Annette Leitz; John Stevens; William B Schoolcraft
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  A Review of The Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Embryo Grading System and Proposed Modification.

Authors:  Amjad Hossain; John Phelps; Ashok Agarwal; Eduardo Sanz; Maha Mahadevan
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-06-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Number of Blastomeres in Day-2 Embryos Affect the Rates of Blastocyst Formation and Clinical Pregnancy During In Vitro Fertilization Cycles.

Authors:  Zuxia Mi; Zheng Liu; Yu Zhang; Juan Zhu; Yufei Yao; Yao Zhou; Yuanhua Huang; Qi Li; Yanlin Ma
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.060

2.  Melatonin Improves Quality of Repeated-Poor and Frozen-Thawed Embryos in Human, a Prospective Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Zhongjian Bao; Guangdong Li; Rongxiang Wang; Songguo Xue; Yong Zeng; Shoulong Deng
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 6.055

3.  Morphology of inner cell mass: a better predictive biomarker of blastocyst viability.

Authors:  Sargunadevi Sivanantham; Mahalakshmi Saravanan; Nidhi Sharma; Jayashree Shrinivasan; Ramesh Raja
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 4.  Mining of variables from embryo morphokinetics, blastocyst's morphology and patient parameters: an approach to predict the live birth in the assisted reproduction service.

Authors:  Dóris Spinosa Chéles; Eloiza Adriane Dal Molin; José Celso Rocha; Marcelo Fábio Gouveia Nogueira
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-10-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.