Literature DB >> 26282663

Breast Density and Benign Breast Disease: Risk Assessment to Identify Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer.

Jeffrey A Tice1, Diana L Miglioretti2, Chin-Shang Li2, Celine M Vachon2, Charlotte C Gard2, Karla Kerlikowske2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Women with proliferative breast lesions are candidates for primary prevention, but few risk models incorporate benign findings to assess breast cancer risk. We incorporated benign breast disease (BBD) diagnoses into the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) risk model, the only breast cancer risk assessment tool that uses breast density.
METHODS: We developed and validated a competing-risk model using 2000 to 2010 SEER data for breast cancer incidence and 2010 vital statistics to adjust for the competing risk of death. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to estimate the relative hazards for age, race/ethnicity, family history of breast cancer, history of breast biopsy, BBD diagnoses, and breast density in the BCSC.
RESULTS: We included 1,135,977 women age 35 to 74 years undergoing mammography with no history of breast cancer; 17% of the women had a prior breast biopsy. During a mean follow-up of 6.9 years, 17,908 women were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer. The BCSC BBD model slightly overpredicted risk (expected-to-observed ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.06) and had modest discriminatory accuracy (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.665). Among women with proliferative findings, adding BBD to the model increased the proportion of women with an estimated 5-year risk of 3% or higher from 9.3% to 27.8% (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: The BCSC BBD model accurately estimates women's risk for breast cancer using breast density and BBD diagnoses. Greater numbers of high-risk women eligible for primary prevention after BBD diagnosis are identified using the BCSC BBD model.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26282663      PMCID: PMC4582144          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  32 in total

1.  Where's the outrage?

Authors:  Melvin Silverstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Medications to decrease the risk for breast cancer in women: recommendations from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Breast cancer chemoprevention: the saga of underuse continues.

Authors:  D Lawrence Wickerham; Victor G Vogel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Use of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Kala Visvanathan; Patricia Hurley; Elissa Bantug; Powel Brown; Nananda F Col; Jack Cuzick; Nancy E Davidson; Andrea Decensi; Carol Fabian; Leslie Ford; Judy Garber; Maria Katapodi; Barnett Kramer; Monica Morrow; Barbara Parker; Carolyn Runowicz; Victor G Vogel; James L Wade; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Benign breast disease, mammographic breast density, and the risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Ellen S O'Meara; Donald L Weaver; Celine Vachon; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Evaluation of the Tyrer-Cuzick (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) model for breast cancer risk prediction in women with atypical hyperplasia.

Authors:  Judy C Boughey; Lynn C Hartmann; Stephanie S Anderson; Amy C Degnim; Robert A Vierkant; Carol A Reynolds; Marlene H Frost; V Shane Pankratz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  The effects of a FRAX revision for the USA.

Authors:  J A Kanis; H Johansson; A Oden; B Dawson-Hughes; L J Melton; E V McCloskey
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Mammographic breast density refines Tyrer-Cuzick estimates of breast cancer risk in high-risk women: findings from the placebo arm of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study I.

Authors:  Jane Warwick; Hanna Birke; Jennifer Stone; Ruth M L Warren; Elizabeth Pinney; Adam R Brentnall; Stephen W Duffy; Anthony Howell; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  85 in total

1.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Radiologist Learning Curve.

Authors:  Diana L Miglioretti; Linn Abraham; Christoph I Lee; Diana S M Buist; Sally D Herschorn; Brian L Sprague; Louise M Henderson; Anna N A Tosteson; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Trends in Clinical Breast Density Assessment From the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.

Authors:  B L Sprague; K Kerlikowske; E J A Bowles; G H Rauscher; C I Lee; A N A Tosteson; D L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Risk Factors That Increase Risk of Estrogen Receptor-Positive and -Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Charlotte C Gard; Jeffrey A Tice; Elad Ziv; Steven R Cummings; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Breast Density Legislation and the Promise Not Attained.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Performance of Screening Ultrasonography as an Adjunct to Screening Mammography in Women Across the Spectrum of Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Robert F Arao; Brian L Sprague; Karla Kerlikowske; Constance D Lehman; Robert A Smith; Louise M Henderson; Garth H Rauscher; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Discussions of Dense Breasts, Breast Cancer Risk, and Screening Choices in 2019.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The Association Between Body Size and Breast Cancer in Han Women in Northern and Eastern China.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Liang Li; Jidong Gao; Jiaqi Liu; Mingming Guo; Liyuan Liu; Wenyan Wang; Jie Wang; Zeyu Xing; Zhigang Yu; Xiang Wang
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2016-08-05

8.  Randomized Trial of Personalized Breast Density and Breast Cancer Risk Notification.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Catherine S Giess; Kimberly A Harris; Julia Ansolabehere; Celia P Kaplan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Age-based versus Risk-based Mammography Screening in Women 40-49 Years Old: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Christina M Shafer; John M Hampton; Oguz Alagoz; Jennifer R Cox; Eric Mischo; Sarina B Schrager; Lee G Wilke
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Breast cancer risk prediction using a clinical risk model and polygenic risk score.

Authors:  Yiwey Shieh; Donglei Hu; Lin Ma; Scott Huntsman; Charlotte C Gard; Jessica W T Leung; Jeffrey A Tice; Celine M Vachon; Steven R Cummings; Karla Kerlikowske; Elad Ziv
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.