Literature DB >> 19228507

Where's the outrage?

Melvin Silverstein1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2009        PMID： 19228507     DOI： 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN： 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


× No keyword cloud information.
  17 in total

1.  Surgical implications and variability in the use of the flat epithelial atypia diagnosis on breast biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Laura S Samples; Mara H Rendi; Paul D Frederick; Kimberly H Allison; Heidi D Nelson; Thomas R Morgan; Donald L Weaver; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.380

2.  Excisional Biopsies for Diagnosis and Treatment of Breast Lumps in Nigerian Women.

Authors:  David O Irabor; Oluwole G Ajao
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-10-01

3.  Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Gary M Longton; Patricia A Carney; Berta M Geller; Tracy Onega; Anna N A Tosteson; Heidi D Nelson; Margaret S Pepe; Kimberly H Allison; Stuart J Schnitt; Frances P O'Malley; Donald L Weaver
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Second opinion strategies in breast pathology: a decision analysis addressing over-treatment, under-treatment, and care costs.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Qian Yang; Heidi D Nelson; Gary Longton; Samir S Soneji; Margaret Pepe; Berta Geller; Patricia A Carney; Tracy Onega; Kimberly H Allison; Joann G Elmore; Donald L Weaver
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Demographic and practice characteristics of pathologists who enjoy breast tissue interpretation.

Authors:  Natalia V Oster; Berta M Geller; Patricia A Carney; Lisa M Reisch; Tracy Onega; Donald L Weaver; Paul Frederick; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Benign breast disease increases breast cancer risk independent of underlying familial risk profile: Findings from a Prospective Family Study Cohort.

Authors:  Nur Zeinomar; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Mary B Daly; Roger L Milne; Gillian S Dite; Robert J MacInnis; Yuyan Liao; Rebecca D Kehm; Julia A Knight; Melissa C Southey; Wendy K Chung; Graham G Giles; Sue-Anne McLachlan; Michael L Friedlander; Prue C Weideman; Gord Glendon; Stephanie Nesci; Irene L Andrulis; Saundra S Buys; Esther M John; John L Hopper; Mary Beth Terry
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 7.396

7.  Breast Density and Benign Breast Disease: Risk Assessment to Identify Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Diana L Miglioretti; Chin-Shang Li; Celine M Vachon; Charlotte C Gard; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Design and evaluation of an ultra-slim objective for in-vivo deep optical biopsy.

Authors:  Sara M Landau; Chen Liang; Robert T Kester; Tomasz S Tkaczyk; Michael R Descour
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Evaluation of 2 breast cancer risk models in a benign breast disease cohort.

Authors:  Ryan D Frank; Stacey J Winham; Robert A Vierkant; Marlene H Frost; Derek C Radisky; Karthik Ghosh; Kathleen R Brandt; Mark E Sherman; Daniel W Visscher; Lynn C Hartmann; Amy C Degnim; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Relation of Quantitative Histologic and Radiologic Breast Tissue Composition Metrics With Invasive Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Mustapha Abubakar; Shaoqi Fan; Erin Aiello Bowles; Lea Widemann; Máire A Duggan; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Roni T Falk; Scott Lawrence; Kathryn Richert-Boe; Andrew G Glass; Teresa M Kimes; Jonine D Figueroa; Thomas E Rohan; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2021-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.