Literature DB >> 23835710

Use of pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer risk reduction: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline.

Kala Visvanathan1, Patricia Hurley, Elissa Bantug, Powel Brown, Nananda F Col, Jack Cuzick, Nancy E Davidson, Andrea Decensi, Carol Fabian, Leslie Ford, Judy Garber, Maria Katapodi, Barnett Kramer, Monica Morrow, Barbara Parker, Carolyn Runowicz, Victor G Vogel, James L Wade, Scott M Lippman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To update the 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer (BC) risk reduction.
METHODS: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses published from June 2007 through June 2012 was completed using MEDLINE and Cochrane Collaboration Library. Primary outcome of interest was BC incidence (invasive and noninvasive). Secondary outcomes included BC mortality, adverse events, and net health benefits. Guideline recommendations were revised based on an Update Committee's review of the literature.
RESULTS: Nineteen articles met the selection criteria. Six chemoprevention agents were identified: tamoxifen, raloxifene, arzoxifene, lasofoxifene, exemestane, and anastrozole. RECOMMENDATIONS: In women at increased risk of BC age ≥ 35 years, tamoxifen (20 mg per day for 5 years) should be discussed as an option to reduce the risk of estrogen receptor (ER) -positive BC. In postmenopausal women, raloxifene (60 mg per day for 5 years) and exemestane (25 mg per day for 5 years) should also be discussed as options for BC risk reduction. Those at increased BC risk are defined as individuals with a 5-year projected absolute risk of BC ≥ 1.66% (based on the National Cancer Institute BC Risk Assessment Tool or an equivalent measure) or women diagnosed with lobular carcinoma in situ. Use of other selective ER modulators or other aromatase inhibitors to lower BC risk is not recommended outside of a clinical trial. Health care providers are encouraged to discuss the option of chemoprevention among women at increased BC risk. The discussion should include the specific risks and benefits associated with each chemopreventive agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23835710     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.49.3122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  116 in total

1.  Conquering Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Affective forecasting and medication decision making in breast-cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael Hoerger; Laura D Scherer; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Epidemiologic Risk Factors for In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancers Among Postmenopausal Women in the National Institutes of Health-AARP Diet and Health Study.

Authors:  Maeve Mullooly; Zeina G Khodr; Cher M Dallal; Sarah J Nyante; Mark E Sherman; Roni Falk; Linda M Liao; Jeffrey Love; Louise A Brinton; Gretchen L Gierach
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Risk factors for endometrial cancer among women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation: a case control study.

Authors:  Yakir Segev; Barry Rosen; Jan Lubinski; Jacek Gronwald; Henry T Lynch; Pal Moller; Charmaine Kim-Sing; Parviz Ghadirian; Beth Karlan; Charis Eng; Dawna Gilchrist; Susan L Neuhausen; Andrea Eisen; Eitan Friedman; David Euhus; Sun Ping; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Acceptance and adherence to chemoprevention among women at increased risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Richard G Roetzheim; Ji-Hyun Lee; William Fulp; Elizabeth Matos Gomez; Elissa Clayton; Sharon Tollin; Nazanin Khakpour; Christine Laronga; Marie Catherine Lee; John V Kiluk
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-12-06       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Convolutional Neural Network Based Breast Cancer Risk Stratification Using a Mammographic Dataset.

Authors:  Richard Ha; Peter Chang; Jenika Karcich; Simukayi Mutasa; Eduardo Pascual Van Sant; Michael Z Liu; Sachin Jambawalikar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Accuracy of screening mammography in women with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ or atypical hyperplasia of the breast.

Authors:  Nehmat Houssami; Linn A Abraham; Tracy Onega; Laura C Collins; Brian L Sprague; Deirdre A Hill; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  Risk-Reducing Options for Women with a Hereditary Breast Cancer Predisposition.

Authors:  Ismail Jatoi
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-10-01

9.  Breast Density and Benign Breast Disease: Risk Assessment to Identify Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Diana L Miglioretti; Chin-Shang Li; Celine M Vachon; Charlotte C Gard; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Symptoms and QOL as Predictors of Chemoprevention Adherence in NRG Oncology/NSABP Trial P-1.

Authors:  Stephanie R Land; Farzana L Walcott; Qing Liu; D Lawrence Wickerham; Joseph P Costantino; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.