Literature DB >> 26279800

The Power of Collaboration: Experiences From the Educational Innovations Project and Implications for the Next Accreditation System.

David B Sweet, Jerry Vasilias, Lynn Clough, Felicia Davis, Furman S McDonald, Eileen E Reynolds, Cheryl W O'Malley, Kevin T Hinchey, Lynne M Kirk, Andrew S Gersoff, E Benjamin Clyburn, John G Frohna.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Internal Medicine Educational Innovations Project (EIP) is a 10-year pilot project for innovating in accreditation, which involves annual reporting of information and less-restrictive requirements for a group of high-performing programs. The EIP program directors' experiences offer insight into the benefits and challenges of innovative approaches to accreditation as the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education transitions to the Next Accreditation System.
OBJECTIVE: We assessed participating program directors' perceptions of the EIP at the midpoint of the project's 10-year life span.
METHODS: We conducted telephone interviews with 15 of 18 current EIP programs (83% response rate) using a 19-item, open-ended, structured survey. Emerging themes were identified with content analysis.
RESULTS: Respondents identified a number of the benefits from the EIP, most prominent among them, collaboration between programs (87%, 13 of 15) and culture change around quality improvement (47%, 7 of 15). The greatest benefit for residents was training in quality improvement methods (53%, 8 of 15), enhancing those residents' ability to become change agents in their future careers. Although the requirement for annual data reporting was identified by 60% (9 of 15) of program directors as the biggest challenge, respondents also considered it an important element for achieving progress on innovations. Program directors unanimously reported their ability to sustain innovation projects beyond the 10-year participation in EIP.
CONCLUSIONS: The work of EIP was not viewed as "more work," but as "different work," which created a new mindset of continuous quality improvement in residency training. Lessons learned offer insight into the value of collaboration and opportunities to use accreditation to foster innovation.

Year:  2014        PMID: 26279800      PMCID: PMC4535239          DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-14-00155.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  10 in total

1.  A new model for accreditation of residency programs in internal medicine.

Authors:  Allan H Goroll; Carl Sirio; F Daniel Duffy; Richard F LeBlond; Patrick Alguire; Thomas A Blackwell; William E Rodak; Thomas Nasca
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  The next GME accreditation system--rationale and benefits.

Authors:  Thomas J Nasca; Ingrid Philibert; Timothy Brigham; Timothy C Flynn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Redesigning residency education in internal medicine: a position paper from the Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine.

Authors:  John P Fitzgibbons; Donald R Bordley; Lee R Berkowitz; Beth W Miller; Mark C Henderson
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Redesigning training for internal medicine.

Authors:  John P Fitzgibbons; Frederick J Meyers
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-12-05       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Internal medicine's Educational Innovations Project: improving health care and learning.

Authors:  Jeanette Mladenovic; Roger Bush; John Frohna
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  The Educational Innovations Project: a community of practice.

Authors:  Eric J Warm; Lia S Logio; Anne Pereira; Raquel Buranosky; Diana McNeill
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  Educational Innovations Project--program participation and education publications.

Authors:  Kris G Thomas; Andrew J Halvorsen; Colin P West; Eric J Warm; Jerry Vasilias; Eileen E Reynolds; John G Frohna; Furman S McDonald
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.965

8.  Playing with curricular milestones in the educational sandbox: Q-sort results from an internal medicine educational collaborative.

Authors:  Lauren B Meade; Kelly J Caverzagie; Susan R Swing; Ron R Jones; Cheryl W O'Malley; Kenji Yamazaki; Aimee K Zaas
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Clinic design, key practice metrics, and resident satisfaction in internal medicine continuity clinics: findings of the educational innovations project ambulatory collaborative.

Authors:  Maureen D Francis; Kris Thomas; Michael Langan; Amy Smith; Sean Drake; Keri Lyn Gwisdalla; Ronald R Jones; Katherine A Julian; Christopher Nabors; Anne Pereira; Michael Rosenblum; Andrew Varney; Eric Warm; Melchor Ortiz
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-06

10.  Redesigning residency training in internal medicine: the consensus report of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine Education Redesign Task Force.

Authors:  Frederick J Meyers; Steven E Weinberger; John P Fitzgibbons; Jeffrey Glassroth; F Daniel Duffy; Charles P Clayton
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.893

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Integration of Continuous Quality Improvement Methods Into Annual Program and Institutional Evaluation.

Authors:  R Brent Stansfield; Tsveti Markova; Richard Baker
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-10

2.  The role of accreditation in 21st century health professions education: report of an International Consensus Group.

Authors:  Jason R Frank; Sarah Taber; Marta van Zanten; Fedde Scheele; Danielle Blouin
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.463

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.