Literature DB >> 23807106

Playing with curricular milestones in the educational sandbox: Q-sort results from an internal medicine educational collaborative.

Lauren B Meade1, Kelly J Caverzagie, Susan R Swing, Ron R Jones, Cheryl W O'Malley, Kenji Yamazaki, Aimee K Zaas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In competency-based medical education, the focus of assessment is on learner demonstration of predefined outcomes or competencies. One strategy being used in internal medicine (IM) is applying curricular milestones to assessment and reporting milestones to competence determination. The authors report a practical method for identifying sets of curricular milestones for assessment of a landmark, or a point where a resident can be entrusted with increased responsibility.
METHOD: Thirteen IM residency programs joined in an educational collaborative to apply curricular milestones to training. The authors developed a game using Q-sort methodology to identify high-priority milestones for the landmark "Ready for indirect supervision in essential ambulatory care" (EsAMB). During May to December 2010, the programs'ambulatory faculty participated in the Q-sort game to prioritize 22 milestones for EsAMB. The authors analyzed the data to identify the top 8 milestones.
RESULTS: In total, 149 faculty units (1-4 faculty each) participated. There was strong agreement on the top eight milestones; six had more than 92% agreement across programs, and five had 75% agreement across all faculty units. During the Q-sort game, faculty engaged in dynamic discussion about milestones and expressed interest in applying the game to other milestones and educational settings.
CONCLUSIONS: The Q-sort game enabled diverse programs to prioritize curricular milestones with interprogram and interparticipant consistency. A Q-sort exercise is an engaging and playful way to address milestones in medical education and may provide a practical first step toward using milestones in the real-world educational setting.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23807106     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829a3967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  13 in total

1.  The Power of Collaboration: Experiences From the Educational Innovations Project and Implications for the Next Accreditation System.

Authors:  David B Sweet; Jerry Vasilias; Lynn Clough; Felicia Davis; Furman S McDonald; Eileen E Reynolds; Cheryl W O'Malley; Kevin T Hinchey; Lynne M Kirk; Andrew S Gersoff; E Benjamin Clyburn; John G Frohna
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-09

2.  Exploring student preferences with a Q-sort: the development of an individualized renal physiology curriculum.

Authors:  John K Roberts; Charles W Hargett; Alisa Nagler; Emma Jakoi; Ruediger W Lehrich
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Using a Curricular Vision to Define Entrustable Professional Activities for Medical Student Assessment.

Authors:  Karen E Hauer; Christy Boscardin; Tracy B Fulton; Catherine Lucey; Sandra Oza; Arianne Teherani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Medical student attitudes toward kidney physiology and nephrology: a qualitative study.

Authors:  John K Roberts; Matthew A Sparks; Ruediger W Lehrich
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.606

Review 5.  A Decade of Teaching and Learning in Internal Medicine Ambulatory Education: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Andrew Coyle; Ira Helenius; Christina M Cruz; E Allison Lyons; Natalie May; John Andrilli; M Merav Bannet; Rachel Pinotti; David C Thomas
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-04

6.  Found in transition: applying milestones to three unique discharge curricula.

Authors:  Lauren B Meade; Christine Y Todd; Meghan M Walsh
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Medical education practice-based research networks: Facilitating collaborative research.

Authors:  Alan Schwartz; Robin Young; Patricia J Hicks
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Stakeholder perspectives on workplace-based performance assessment: towards a better understanding of assessor behaviour.

Authors:  Laury P J W M de Jonge; Angelique A Timmerman; Marjan J B Govaerts; Jean W M Muris; Arno M M Muijtjens; Anneke W M Kramer; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.853

9.  Patterns in clinical students' self-regulated learning behavior: a Q-methodology study.

Authors:  Joris J Berkhout; Pim W Teunissen; Esther Helmich; Job van Exel; Cees P M van der Vleuten; Debbie A D C Jaarsma
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.853

10.  Patient safety and quality improvement: a 'CLER' time to move beyond peripheral participation.

Authors:  Daniel J Schumacher; John G Frohna
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2016-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.