| Literature DB >> 26274796 |
Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman1, Heather Angier1, Aleksandra Sumic2, Rose L Harding1, Erika K Cottrell1, Deborah J Cohen1, Christine A Nelson2, Timothy E Burdick1,3,4, Lorraine S Wallace5, Charles Gallia6, Jennifer E DeVoe1,2.
Abstract
The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute has accelerated conversations about the importance of actively engaging stakeholders in all aspects of comparative effectiveness research (CER). Other scientific disciplines have a history of stakeholder engagement, yet few empirical examples exist of how these stakeholders can inform and enrich CER. Here we present a case study which includes the methods used to engage stakeholders, what we learned from them, and how we incorporated their ideas in a CER project. We selected stakeholders from key groups, built relationships with them and collected their feedback through interviews, observation and ongoing meetings during the four research process phases: proposal development, adapting study methods, understanding the context and information technology tool design and refinement.Entities:
Keywords: community networks; comparative effectiveness research; consumer participation; patient engagement; patient-centered outcomes research
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26274796 PMCID: PMC4538706 DOI: 10.2217/cer.15.24
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Comp Eff Res ISSN: 2042-6305 Impact factor: 1.744