Literature DB >> 7976480

Qualitative analysis: how to begin making sense.

W L Miller1, B F Crabtree.   

Abstract

The clinical process used to make sense of patient concerns closely parallels the analysis process of qualitative research. This partly explains why qualitative research methods are appropriate for many family practice research questions. Unfortunately, the language used by qualitative researchers, especially with regards to analysis, is often obscure. This impedes family physicians from implementing qualitative research. This paper overviews qualitative analysis and introduces a language and means by which family physicians can begin to make sense of qualitative data. The concepts, "reflexivity," "iteration," "data saturation," and "text," are defined. Three core steps of qualitative analysis are identified and compared to the diagnostic process. They consist of choosing an organizing system, reducing the data, and making connections. Four idealized ways for conducting these steps, editing, template, quasistatistical, and immersion/crystallization, are presented and compared to four ways of approaching patient concerns. Finally, the process of creating an appropriate qualitative analysis strategy is described for a hypothetical research study and some pitfalls and principles of qualitative analysis are reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7976480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract Res J        ISSN: 0270-2304


  43 in total

Review 1.  How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research.

Authors:  K J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Counseling to prevent obesity among preschool children: acceptability of a pilot urban primary care intervention.

Authors:  M Diane McKee; Stacia Maher; Darwin Deen; Arthur E Blank
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Urban women's preferences for learning of their mammogram result: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Erin N Marcus; Darlene Drummond; Noella Dietz
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  IMPACCT Kids' Care: a real-world example of stakeholder involvement in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman; Heather Angier; Aleksandra Sumic; Rose L Harding; Erika K Cottrell; Deborah J Cohen; Christine A Nelson; Timothy E Burdick; Lorraine S Wallace; Charles Gallia; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.744

5.  Evaluative criteria for qualitative research in health care: controversies and recommendations.

Authors:  Deborah J Cohen; Benjamin F Crabtree
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Patients' stories and clinical care. Uniting the unique and the universal?

Authors:  C Feudtner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Qualitative research in medicine and health care: questions and controversy.

Authors:  R M Poses; A M Isen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Factors affecting physicians' responses to patients' requests for antidepressants: focus group study.

Authors:  Aleksey Tentler; Jordan Silberman; Debora A Paterniti; Richard L Kravitz; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  The visit before the morning after: barriers to preprescribing emergency contraception.

Authors:  Alison Karasz; Nicole Tan Kirchen; Marji Gold
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

10.  Conducting health research in Korean American churches: perspectives from church leaders.

Authors:  Angela M Jo; Annette E Maxwell; Bryan Yang; Roshan Bastani
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.