Literature DB >> 20921483

How best to engage patients, doctors, and other stakeholders in designing comparative effectiveness studies.

Ari Hoffman1, Russ Montgomery, Wade Aubry, Sean R Tunis.   

Abstract

Having patients, doctors, health plan managers, hospital executives, and other stakeholders participate in the design of comparative effectiveness studies can ensure that this vital research focuses on the evidence gaps most relevant to health care decision makers. Through a qualitative assessment of case studies, we identify five key principles for the effective engagement of a broad coalition of participants in research intended to improve health care and control costs. Those principles are to ensure balance among the participating stakeholders; get participants to "buy in" to the process and understand their roles; provide neutral and expert facilitators for research discussions; establish connections among the participants; and keep the participants engaged throughout the research process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20921483     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  54 in total

1.  A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research.

Authors:  Thomas W Concannon; Paul Meissner; Jo Anne Grunbaum; Newell McElwee; Jeanne-Marie Guise; John Santa; Patrick H Conway; Denise Daudelin; Elaine H Morrato; Laurel K Leslie
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Prioritization in comparative effectiveness research: the CANCERGEN Experience.

Authors:  Rahber Thariani; William Wong; Josh J Carlson; Louis Garrison; Scott Ramsey; Patricia A Deverka; Laura Esmail; Sneha Rangarao; Carolyn J Hoban; Laurence H Baker; David L Veenstra
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  IMPACCT Kids' Care: a real-world example of stakeholder involvement in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman; Heather Angier; Aleksandra Sumic; Rose L Harding; Erika K Cottrell; Deborah J Cohen; Christine A Nelson; Timothy E Burdick; Lorraine S Wallace; Charles Gallia; Jennifer E DeVoe
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 4.  Comparative effectiveness research in urology.

Authors:  Amy T Wang; Jeffrey K Wang; Victor M Montori; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Refusal to participate in heart failure studies: do age and gender matter?

Authors:  Jordan M Harrison; Miyeon Jung; Terry A Lennie; Debra K Moser; Dean G Smith; Sandra B Dunbar; David L Ronis; Todd M Koelling; Bruno Giordani; Penny L Riley; Susan J Pressler
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.036

6.  Methods for engaging stakeholders in comparative effectiveness research: a patient-centered approach to improving diabetes care.

Authors:  Julie A Schmittdiel; Jay Desai; Emily B Schroeder; Andrea R Paolino; Gregory A Nichols; Jean M Lawrence; Patrick J O'Connor; Kris A Ohnsorg; Katherine M Newton; John F Steiner
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2015-03-13

7.  Querying stakeholders to inform comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Yoon Duk Hong; Daisuke Goto; C Daniel Mullins
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 8.  Comparative effectiveness research in the "real" world: lessons learned in a study of treatment-resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Marilyn A Laken; Rosalind Dawson; Otis Engelman; Oscar Lovelace; Charles Way; Brent M Egan
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb

9.  Family Perspectives on Telemedicine for Pediatric Subspecialty Care.

Authors:  Kristin N Ray; Laura Ellen Ashcraft; Ateev Mehrotra; Elizabeth Miller; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.536

10.  Facilitating comparative effectiveness research in cancer genomics: evaluating stakeholder perceptions of the engagement process.

Authors:  Patricia A Deverka; Danielle C Lavallee; Priyanka J Desai; Joanne Armstrong; Mark Gorman; Leah Hole-Curry; James O'Leary; B W Ruffner; John Watkins; David L Veenstra; Laurence H Baker; Joseph M Unger; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.744

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.