Literature DB >> 26269726

Delayed Cranioplasty: Outcomes Using Frozen Autologous Bone Flaps.

Daniel Hng1, Ivan Bhaskar1, Mumtaz Khan1, Charley Budgeon2, Omprakash Damodaran1, Neville Knuckey3, Gabriel Lee3.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of skull defects following decompressive craniectomy is associated with a high rate of complications. Implantation of autologous cryopreserved bone has been associated with infection rates of up to 33%, resulting in considerable patient morbidity. Predisposing factors for infection and other complications are poorly understood. Patients undergoing cranioplasty between 1999 and 2009 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Records and imaging were reviewed retrospectively. Demographics, the initial craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty surgeries, complications, and outcomes were recorded. A total of 187 patients underwent delayed cranioplasty using autologous bone flaps cryopreserved at -30°C following decompressive craniectomy. Indications for craniectomy were trauma (77.0%), stroke (16.0%), subarachnoid hemorrhage (2.67%), tumor (2.14%), and infection (2.14%). There were 64 complications overall (34.2%), the most common being infection (11.2%) and bone resorption (5.35%). After multivariate analysis, intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was significantly associated with infection, whereas longer duration of surgery and unilateral site were associated with resorption. Cranioplasty using frozen autologous bone is associated with a high rate of infective complications. Intraoperative CSF leak is a potentially modifiable risk factor. Meticulous dissection during cranioplasty surgery to minimize the chance of breaching the dural or pseudodural plane may reduce the chance of bone flap.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autogenous; autologous; cerebrospinal fluid; cranial reconstruction; cranioplasty

Year:  2014        PMID: 26269726      PMCID: PMC4532567          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1395383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  45 in total

1.  Bone flap storage following craniectomy: a survey of practices in major Australian neurosurgical centres.

Authors:  Ivan Paul Bhaskar; Nyi Nyi Zaw; Minghao Zheng; Gabriel Yin Foo Lee
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 1.872

2.  Clinical outcome in cranioplasty: critical review in long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Andrea Moreira-Gonzalez; Ian T Jackson; Takeshi Miyawaki; Khaled Barakat; Vincent DiNick
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 3.  Late infection after cranioplasty--review of 14 cases.

Authors:  K Tokoro; Y Chiba; K Tsubone
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  [Cranioplasty using autogenous bone cryopreserved with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)].

Authors:  Shigetoshi Shimizu; Atsunori Morikawa; Yoshihiro Kuga; Genshin Mouri; Tetsuya Murata
Journal:  No Shinkei Geka       Date:  2002-05

5.  Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts.

Authors:  Kiya Movassaghi; Jon Ver Halen; Parham Ganchi; Sepi Amin-Hanjani; John Mesa; Michael J Yaremchuk
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Outcome following decompressive craniectomy for malignant swelling due to severe head injury.

Authors:  Bizhan Aarabi; Dale C Hesdorffer; Edward S Ahn; Carla Aresco; Thomas M Scalea; Howard M Eisenberg
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  A new bone banking technique to maintain osteoblast viability in frozen human iliac cancellous bone.

Authors:  Jung-Hwan Oh; Joachim E Zöller; Alexander Kübler
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.487

8.  Autogenous skull cranioplasty: fresh and preserved (frozen), with consideration of the cellular response.

Authors:  D J Prolo; K P Burres; W T McLaughlin; A H Christensen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 9.  Bone autografting of the calvaria and craniofacial skeleton: historical background, surgical results in a series of 15 patients, and review of the literature.

Authors:  Marco Artico; Luigi Ferrante; Francesco Saverio Pastore; Epimenio Orlando Ramundo; Davide Cantarelli; Domenico Scopelliti; Giorgio Iannetti
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2003-07

10.  Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts in abdominal wall-Experience with 75 cases in a post-war country Kosova.

Authors:  Arsim Morina; Fatos Kelmendi; Qamile Morina; Shefki Dragusha; Feti Ahmeti; Dukagjin Morina; Kushtrim Gashi
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-05-28
View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The storage of skull bone flaps for autologous cranioplasty: literature review.

Authors:  Vicente Mirabet; Daniel García; Nuria Yagüe; Luis Roberto Larrea; Cristina Arbona; Carlos Botella
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.522

2.  Autologous Cranioplasty Post-Operative Surgical Site Infection: Does It Matter if the Bone Flaps were Stored and Handled Differently?

Authors:  Pooi Pooi Cheah; Azmin Kass Rosman; Chee Keong Cheang; Badrisyah Idris
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-29

3.  Histological assessment of porous custom-made hydroxyapatite implants 6 months and 2.5 years after cranioplasty.

Authors:  Hajime Ono; Taigen Sase; Yuichiro Tanaka; Hiroshi Takasuna
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2017-01-19

4.  Cranial autologous bone flap resorption after a cranioplasty: A case report.

Authors:  Sabrina A de França; Thales B Nepomuceno; Wellingson S Paiva; Almir F Andrade; Manoel J Teixeira; Wagner M Tavares
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2018-03-19

5.  Establishment and Characteristic Analysis of a Dog Model for Autologous Homologous Cranioplasty.

Authors:  Wenyu Zhu; Jie Wu; Haifeng Zhao; Weihua Wang; Lichun Lu; Ke Yan; Yin Yin; Qiang Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Staged reconstruction of large skull defects with soft tissue infection after craniectomy using free flap and cranioplasty with a custom-made titanium mesh constructed by 3D-CT-guided 3D printing technology: Two case reports.

Authors:  Seong Hwan Kim; Seong Joo Lee; Jun Won Lee; Hii Sun Jeong; In Suck Suh
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  Can early cranioplasty reduce the incidence of hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Davide Nasi; Mauro Dobran
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2020-05-02

8.  Effect of cranioplasty timing on the functional neurological outcome and postoperative complications.

Authors:  Ahmed Aloraidi; Ali Alkhaibary; Ahoud Alharbi; Nada Alnefaie; Abeer Alaglan; Abdulaziz AlQarni; Turki Elarjani; Ala Arab; Jamal M Abdullah; Abdulaziz Oqalaa Almubarak; Munzir Abbas; Ibtesam Khairy; Wedad H Almadani; Mohammed Alowhaibi; Abdulaziz Alarifi; Sami Khairy; Ahmed Alkhani
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2021-06-07

9.  Cranioplasty Using Autoclaved Autologous Skull Bone Flaps Preserved at Ambient Temperature.

Authors:  Dominic Anto; Raju Paul Manjooran; Rajeev Aravindakshan; Kumar Lakshman; Raymond Morris
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

10.  Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals.

Authors:  Dave Chamo; Bilal Msallem; Neha Sharma; Soheila Aghlmandi; Christoph Kunz; Florian M Thieringer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.