Literature DB >> 21697987

Cranioplasty with subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts in abdominal wall-Experience with 75 cases in a post-war country Kosova.

Arsim Morina1, Fatos Kelmendi, Qamile Morina, Shefki Dragusha, Feti Ahmeti, Dukagjin Morina, Kushtrim Gashi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study is to show the advantages of preservation of a calvarial bone flap in the abdominal pocket after decompressive craniotomy. Decompressive craniectomy is an option in the surgical management of refractory hypertension when maximal medical treatment (sedation, drainage of cerebrospinal fluid, moderate cooling, etc) has failed to control refractory high intracranial pressure.
METHODS: We have prospectively analyzed 82 consecutively operated cases decompressive craniotomies done at the University Neurosurgical Clinic in Prishtina/KOSOVA over a period of eight years (June 1999 to Aug 2008). Of the 75 who had their grafts replaced (7 patient died before replacement of bone graft), 62 patients had hemicraniectomy (fronto-parieto-temporal) 7 of them were bilateral.
RESULTS: In 66 out of 75 patients was achieved a satisfactory and cosmetically reconstruction, in 9 cases was required augmentation with methyl methacrylate to achieve cosmetic needs. Two patients had infection and the bone was removed; 6 months later these patients had cranioplasty with methyl methacrylate. The duration of storage of calvarial bone in abdominal pouch before reimplantation was 14 - 232 days (range 56 days).
CONCLUSION: We think that storage of the patients own bone flap in the abdominal pocket is a safe, easy, cheap, sterile, histocompatible, and better cosmetic results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autogenous bone; bone flap; cranioplasty; subgaleal pocket

Year:  2011        PMID: 21697987      PMCID: PMC3115275          DOI: 10.4103/2152-7806.81735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Neurol Int        ISSN: 2152-7806


INTRODUCTION

Decompressive craniectomy can be defined as the removal of a large area of the skull with opening of the dura to increase the volume of the cranial cavity, facilitating a reduction in intracranial pressure. Decompressive craniectomy is an option in the surgical management of refractory hypertension when maximal medical treatment (sedation, drainage of cerebrospinal fluid, moderate cooling, etc) has failed to control refractory high intracranial pressure, especially in brain trauma, stroke, and post-operative edema after brain surgery. The technique of storing the craniectomy graft in a subcutaneous location in the patient offers a theoretical advantage in that the patient's own body might provide a storage environment, thereby reducing graft devitalization.[2689] Autologous calvarial bone graft has been widely accepted as the best and safest method for reconstruction and also provides the best cosmesis. Various preservation techniques include deep freezing, preservation in bactericidal solutions, sterilization, and preservation in a subgaleal pouch.[11011] The cosmetic outcome of some of these is poor because of the adverse effects of the technique on graft preservation.[151011] In 1920, Kreider[9] reported the first case of preservation of calvarial bone in the left hypochondrium. This was in a 4-year-old boy who had sustained a compound skull fracture. Destination of a bone flap after craniotomy has many possible fates. The aim of the present clinical study was to assess the efficacy of preservation of calvarial bone in an abdominal pouch.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We have prospectively analyzed 82 consecutively operated cases decompressive craniotomies done at the University Neurosurgical Clinic in Prishtina / KOSOVA over a period of 8 years (June 1999 to Aug 2008). Of the 75 who had their grafts replaced (7 patient died before replacement of bone graft), 62 patients had hemicraniectomy (fronto-parieto-temporal), 7 of them were bilateral. The rest of the 13 patients required smaller craniectomy for decompression. Dura was always opened in a stellate fashion and after brain herniation it was closed with fascia pericranialis. Six patients were thin, 57 were normal, and 12 were obese. The mean age of patients was 39 years (range, 1 to 68 years). Male were 49 and female were 33. Out of 82, children were 16. Etiology of brain swelling requiring decompressive craniectomy in 82 patients is listed in Table 1.
Table 1

Etiology of brain swelling requiring decompressive craniectomy

Etiology of brain swelling requiring decompressive craniectomy In the region of mesogastrium of left abdomen, we performed a linear horizontal incision with length between 8 and 12 cm (depend on the size of bone graft). With surgical scissors, we prepare the so-called abdominal pocket. After meticulous surgical hemostasis, we placed the bone graft with the convex part on upper site, because the bone edges can injure the skin. Under skin and skin are sutured with interrupted sutures. We do not prefer the right sight because in the future the scar might suggest the procedures like cholecystectomia or appendectomia. Presentation of a case: Figure 1. Cranial defect before graft replacement. Figure 2. Bone graft in abdominal pocket. Figure 3. Taking the bone out of abdomen. Figure 4. Quality of bone after six months. Figure 5. Three weeks after replacement of bone flap – perfect surgical/cosmetically results L/L view. Figure 6. Three weeks after replacement of bone flap perfectsurgical/cosmetically results A/P view.
Figure 1

Cranial defect before graft replacement

Figure 2

Bone graft in abdominal pocket

Figure 3

Taking the bone out of abdomen

Figure 4

Quality of bone after six months

Figure 5

Three weeks after replacement of bone flap – perfect surgical/cosmetically results L/L view?

Figure 6

Three weeks after replacement of bone flap – perfect surgical/cosmetically results A/P view

Cranial defect before graft replacement Bone graft in abdominal pocket Taking the bone out of abdomen Quality of bone after six months Three weeks after replacement of bone flap – perfect surgical/cosmetically results L/L view? Three weeks after replacement of bone flap – perfect surgical/cosmetically results A/P view The post operative evaluation was based on adequacy of the recovered craniotomy graft to achieve satisfactory reconstruction.

RESULTS

In 66 out of 75 patients was achieved a satisfactory and cosmetically reconstruction, and in 9 cases was required augmentation with methyl methacrylate to achieve cosmetic needs. During surgery the temporo-basal region was removed in small pieces with rongeurs the part that required augmentation with methyl methacrylate. Two patients had infection and the bone was removed; 6 months later these patients had cranioplasty with methyl methacrylate. The duration of storage of calvarial bone in an abdominal pouch before reimplantation was 14 – 232 days (range 56 days). At the time of cranioplasty done and after a few months, we did not encounter microscopic resorption of the bone flap in any of our patients. The average of GCS on admission was 6 (range 3 - 15). After calvarial bone replacement hematomas occurred in 4 patients: 3 were subgaleactic and 1 in abdominal pouch, there was no need for percutaneous aspiration. After the onset of symptoms and mass effect on computed tomography, timing of decompressive craniectomy was 1 – 6 h (range 2 hours). Involvement of dominant hemisphere was in 51 cases. Average extra time required for preparing abdominal pouch to insert calvarial bone was 14 min (range 9 – 21 minutes) average size of bone was 9 × 11cm (range 8 – 12 × 10 – 13). Two patients were complaining because of unpleasant abdominal pressure sensation. In seven cases of bilateral craniectomy, calvarial bones were preserved on both sides each.

CONCLUSION

When there is a high intracranial pressure and is not linked to evacuable mass lesions, such as in patients with massive bilateral brain swelling or unilateral massive brain swelling, medical treatment in such cases is frequently ineffective in controlling high intracranial pressure. Decompression craniotomy should be seen as a last resort therapeutic option. Routine decompression craniotomy should not be recommended for all patients with brain swelling. Early decompressive craniotomy is a therapeutic option in the management of these patients. The size of craniectomy is of critical importance. Small craniectomies risk brain herniation with venous infarction and increased edema at the bone margins. Replacement of the bone removed at craniotomy, a fresh skull autograft, is superior to all alternative forms of cranioplasty.[2347121415] Recently, custom alloplastic implants prefabricated from computed tomography data have made alloplastic reconstruction of these large defects more precise and less time consuming. However, the risks of complications related to a large foreign body remain. For these reasons, returning the bone removed during decompressive craniectomy to the defects at a later date is an attractive reconstructive alternative.[151314] While cranioplasty with a frozen or freeze-dried craniectomy graft results in an initial perfect reconstruction, it is subject to a high rate of graft resorption after replacement. In Hauptli and Segantini's[8] series of 143 craniectomy grafts undergoing cryogenic preservation, 86 (60%) had osteolysis significant enough to produce instability or unsatisfactory cosmetic results and 23 patients (16%) required surgical revision. In contrast, Hauptli and Segantini reported that only 3 of 42 (7%) of subcutaneous preserved grafts required revision cranioplasty. Three of our thin patients experience some discomfort from the stored graft in abdominal pouch. Bone flap was stored between the fat and muscle tissue. Autogenic bone flap is alive, not expensive, and perfectly fit with the size of the defect. Brain protection and cosmetic aspects are the major indications of cranioplasty. We think that storage of the patients own bone flap in the abdominal pocket is a safe, easy, cheap, sterile, histocompatible, and better cosmetic results. When replacement the bone removed at craniotomy, a fresh skull autograft is superior to all alternative forms of cranioplasty such as methylmetacrylate or some metals like tantalum. When compared to the use of synthetic cranioplasty materials, a personal bone flap has very low percentage of inflammatory complications. This procedure is standardized in our University Neurosurgical Clinic of Kosova (post war country) from 1999 and we kindly prefer this procedure to other centers.
  11 in total

1.  The use of refrigerated autogenous bone flaps for cranioplasty.

Authors:  G L ODOM; B WOODHALL; F R WRENN
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1952-11       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Use of frozen cranial bone flaps for autogenous and homologous grafts in cranioplasty and spinal interbody fusion.

Authors:  K H ABBOTT
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1953-07       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Bone flap preservation after decompressive craniectomy--experience with 55 cases.

Authors:  Prasad Krishnan; Asis Kumar Bhattacharyya; Kaushik Sil; Rahul De
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  The preservation and clinical use of freeze-dried bone.

Authors:  F P KREUZ; G W HYATT; T C TURNER; A L BASSETT
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1951-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The bone-bank in neurosurgery.

Authors:  H ELLIOTT; H J SCOTT
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1951-07       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Subgaleal preservation of calvarial flaps.

Authors:  A Goel; M Deogaonkar
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1995-08

7.  Bone grafts in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  K E Salyer; D P Taylor
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 2.017

8.  [New tissue preservation method for bone flaps following decompressive craniotomy].

Authors:  J Häuptli; P Segantini
Journal:  Helv Chir Acta       Date:  1980-06

9.  Autogenous skull cranioplasty: fresh and preserved (frozen), with consideration of the cellular response.

Authors:  D J Prolo; K P Burres; W T McLaughlin; A H Christensen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Histopathologic and microdensitometric analysis of craniotomy bone flaps preserved between abdominal fat and muscle.

Authors:  B Açikgöz; O E Ozcan; A Erbengi; V Bertan; S Ruacan; H G Açikgöz
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1986-12
View more
  13 in total

1.  Cranioplasty for large-sized calvarial defects in the pediatric population: a review.

Authors:  Sandi Lam; Justin Kuether; Abigail Fong; Russell Reid
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-20

Review 2.  The storage of skull bone flaps for autologous cranioplasty: literature review.

Authors:  Vicente Mirabet; Daniel García; Nuria Yagüe; Luis Roberto Larrea; Cristina Arbona; Carlos Botella
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.522

3.  Autologous Cranioplasty Post-Operative Surgical Site Infection: Does It Matter if the Bone Flaps were Stored and Handled Differently?

Authors:  Pooi Pooi Cheah; Azmin Kass Rosman; Chee Keong Cheang; Badrisyah Idris
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2017-12-29

4.  A Retrospective Study of Complications in Cranioplasty: 7-Year Period.

Authors:  S K Roy Chowdhury; Ashok Kumar; Prashant Kumar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-11-23

5.  Delayed Cranioplasty: Outcomes Using Frozen Autologous Bone Flaps.

Authors:  Daniel Hng; Ivan Bhaskar; Mumtaz Khan; Charley Budgeon; Omprakash Damodaran; Neville Knuckey; Gabriel Lee
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-12-17

Review 6.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors involved in bone flap resorption after decompressive craniectomy.

Authors:  Francesco Signorelli; Martina Giordano; Valerio Maria Caccavella; Eleonora Ioannoni; Camilla Gelormini; Anselmo Caricato; Alessandro Olivi; Nicola Montano
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Cranioplasty complications and risk factors associated with bone flap resorption.

Authors:  Tor Brommeland; Pål Nicolay Rydning; Are Hugo Pripp; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  Analyses Using Micro-CT Scans and Tissue Staining on New Bone Formation and Bone Fusion According to the Timing of Cranioplasty via Frozen Autologous Bone Flaps in Rabbits : A Preliminary Report.

Authors:  Hee Sup Shin; Deok-Won Lee; Seung Hwan Lee; Jun Seok Koh
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-04-24

9.  Analysis of the Risk Factors Affecting the Surgical Site Infection after Cranioplasty Following Decompressive Craniectomy.

Authors:  Jin Seong Kim; In Sung Park; Sung Kwon Kim; Hyun Park; Dong-Ho Kang; Chul-Hee Lee; Soo-Hyun Hwang; Jin-Myung Jung; Jong-Woo Han
Journal:  Korean J Neurotrauma       Date:  2015-10-31

10.  Cranioplasty with autologous cryopreserved bone after decompressive craniectomy: complications and risk factors for developing surgical site infection.

Authors:  J Sundseth; A Sundseth; J Berg-Johnsen; W Sorteberg; K-F Lindegaard
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 2.216

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.