Literature DB >> 26265999

Comparison between modified Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr techniques for Cesarean section: review of literature.

Salvatore Giovanni Vitale1, Ilaria Marilli2, Pietro Cignini3, Francesco Padula3, Laura D'Emidio3, Lucia Mangiafico3, Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda1, Ferdinando Antonio Gulino2, Stefano Cianci1, Antonio Biondi4, Claudio Giorlandino3.   

Abstract

In the last decades cesarean section rates increased in many countries becoming the most performed intraperitoneal surgical procedure. Despite its worldwide spread, a general consensus on the most appropriate technique to use has not yet been reached. The operative technique performed is made chiefly on the basis of the individual experience and preference of operators, the characteristics of patients, timing and urgency of intervention. We compared the two most known and used techniques, modified Misgav-Ladach and traditional Pfannenstiel-Kerr, and analyzed their impact on primary, short- and long-term outcomes and outcome related to health service use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caesarean section; Joel-Cohen incision; Pfannenstiel-Kerr; modified Misgav-Ladach

Year:  2014        PMID: 26265999      PMCID: PMC4510561     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prenat Med        ISSN: 1971-3282


  25 in total

1.  The Misgav Ladach method for cesarean section: method description.

Authors:  G Holmgren; L Sjöholm; M Stark
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  The Misgav-Ladach method of cesarean section: a step forward in operative technique in obstetrics.

Authors:  Igor Hudić; Emmanuel Bujold; Zlatan Fatušić; Fahrija Skokić; Anela Latifagić; Mirela Kapidžić; Jasenko Fatušić
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 3.  Epidemiology of cesarean delivery: the scope of the problem.

Authors:  Annelee Boyle; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 4.  Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery: an updated systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua D Dahlke; Hector Mendez-Figueroa; Dwight J Rouse; Vincenzo Berghella; Jason K Baxter; Suneet P Chauhan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Ultrasound evaluation of Cesarean scar after single- and double-layer uterotomy closure: a cohort study.

Authors:  J Glavind; L D Madsen; N Uldbjerg; M Dueholm
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.299

6.  The role of uterine closure in the risk of uterine rupture.

Authors:  Emmanuel Bujold; Martine Goyet; Sylvie Marcoux; Normand Brassard; Béatrice Cormier; Emily Hamilton; Belkacem Abdous; Elhadji A Laouan Sidi; Robert Kinch; Louise Miner; André Masse; Claude Fortin; Guy-Paul Gagné; André Fortier; Gilles Bastien; Robert Sabbah; Pierre Guimond; Stéphanie Roberge; Robert J Gauthier
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography.

Authors:  Hiromi Hayakawa; Atsuo Itakura; Takashi Mitsui; Mayumi Okada; Masaki Suzuki; Koji Tamakoshi; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography.

Authors:  O Naji; L Wynants; A Smith; Y Abdallah; C Stalder; A Sayasneh; A McIndoe; S Ghaem-Maghami; S Van Huffel; B Van Calster; D Timmerman; T Bourne
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.299

9.  Caesarean section: could different transverse abdominal incision techniques influence postpartum pain and subsequent quality of life? A systematic review.

Authors:  Salvatore Gizzo; Alessandra Andrisani; Marco Noventa; Stefania Di Gangi; Michela Quaranta; Erich Cosmi; Donato D'Antona; Giovanni Battista Nardelli; Guido Ambrosini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Caesarean delivery and subsequent pregnancy interval: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sinéad M O'Neill; Patricia M Kearney; Louise C Kenny; Tine B Henriksen; Jennifer E Lutomski; Richard A Greene; Ali S Khashan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  4 in total

1.  Preoperative work-up for definition of lymph node risk involvement in early stage endometrial cancer: 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Pietro Cignini; Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Antonio Simone Laganà; Antonio Biondi; Valentina Lucia La Rosa; Giuseppe Cutillo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-01-20

2.  Standard of Open Surgical Repair of Suprapubic Incisional Hernias.

Authors:  Yohann Renard; Anne-Charlotte Simonneau; Louis de Mestier; Lugdivine Teuma; Jean-Luc Meffert; Jean-Pierre Palot; Reza Kianmanesh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Maternal morbidity associated with skin incision type at cesarean delivery in obese patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dani Zoorob; Oxana Zarudskaya; James Van Hook; Hind N Moussa
Journal:  Future Sci OA       Date:  2020-12-18

4.  Impact of tearing spermatic cords during castration in live and dead piglets and consequences on welfare.

Authors:  Simone M Schmid; Chiara I Genter; Céline Heinemann; Julia Steinhoff-Wagner
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-02-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.