Literature DB >> 23371440

Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography.

O Naji1, L Wynants, A Smith, Y Abdallah, C Stalder, A Sayasneh, A McIndoe, S Ghaem-Maghami, S Van Huffel, B Van Calster, D Timmerman, T Bourne.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a model to predict the success of a trial of vaginal birth after Cesarean section (VBAC) based on sonographic measurements of Cesarean section (CS) scar features, demographic variables and previous obstetric history.
METHODS: We used transvaginal sonography (TVS) to examine the CS scar of 320 consecutive pregnant women. TVS was carried out at 11-13, 19-21 and 34-36 weeks' gestation and prospective measurements of the scar were recorded at each visit according to a defined protocol. A logistic regression model to predict success of VBAC was developed for those patients with a visible scar on ultrasound and only one previous CS. The model was evaluated using bootstrap validation.
RESULTS: There were 131 women with one previous CS and a visible scar, of whom 10 underwent CS prior to labor and were excluded from analysis. Successful VBAC was achieved in 74/121 (61%) of the remaining cases. The prediction model developed was based on patient age, previous history of VBAC, residual myometrial thickness (RMT) and the change in RMT from the first to the second trimester (ΔRMT). The internally validated area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve was 0.62 when measurements of RMT and ΔRMT were excluded, but 0.94 when scar information was incorporated into the model.
CONCLUSION: Ultrasound measurements of CS scar, namely RMT and the change in RMT from the first to the second trimester of pregnancy, when incorporated into a mathematical model, can predict accurately a successful trial of labor in patients with one previous CS.
Copyright © 2013 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23371440     DOI: 10.1002/uog.12423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  11 in total

Review 1.  Comparison between modified Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr techniques for Cesarean section: review of literature.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Ilaria Marilli; Pietro Cignini; Francesco Padula; Laura D'Emidio; Lucia Mangiafico; Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda; Ferdinando Antonio Gulino; Stefano Cianci; Antonio Biondi; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

2.  VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER A PREVIOUS CAESAREAN SECTION: CURRENT TRENDS AND OUTLOOK IN GHANA.

Authors:  J D Seffah; K Adu-Bonsaffoh
Journal:  J West Afr Coll Surg       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

3.  Mechanical Effects of a Maylard Scar During a Vaginal Birth After a Previous Caesarean.

Authors:  D S Fidalgo; M C P Vila Pouca; D A Oliveira; E Malanowska; K M Myers; R M Natal Jorge; M P L Parente
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  The effect of the use of a decision aid with individual risk estimation on the mode of delivery after a caesarean section: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Emy Vankan; Ellen Schoorel; Sander van Kuijk; Jan Nijhuis; Rosella Hermens; Hubertina Scheepers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Why do niches develop in Caesarean uterine scars? Hypotheses on the aetiology of niche development.

Authors:  A J M W Vervoort; L B Uittenbogaard; W J K Hehenkamp; H A M Brölmann; B W J Mol; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Etiology of Cesarean Uterine Scar Defect (Niche): Detailed Critical Analysis of Hypotheses and Prevention Strategies and Peritoneal Closure Debate.

Authors:  Shashikant L Sholapurkar
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2018-01-26

7.  Reduced pregnancy and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization in women with previous Caesarean section: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  J Vissers; T C Sluckin; C C Repelaer van Driel-Delprat; R Schats; C J M Groot; C B Lambalk; J W R Twisk; J A F Huirne
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Factors associated with successful vaginal birth after a cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanxin Wu; Yachana Kataria; Zilian Wang; Wai-Kit Ming; Christina Ellervik
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  The Failure Rate, Related Factors, and Neonate Complications of Vaginal Delivery after Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Azadeh Asgarian; Nayereh Rahmati; Farzaneh Nasiri; Abolfazl Mohammadbeigi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2019-12-27

10.  Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Southeast China: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hua-Le Zhang; Liang-Hui Zheng; Li-Chun Cheng; Zhao-Dong Liu; Lu Yu; Qin Han; Geng-Yun Miao; Jian-Ying Yan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.