Literature DB >> 16612704

Methods for myometrium closure and other factors impacting effects on cesarean section scars of the uterine segment detected by the ultrasonography.

Hiromi Hayakawa1, Atsuo Itakura, Takashi Mitsui, Mayumi Okada, Masaki Suzuki, Koji Tamakoshi, Fumitaka Kikkawa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound examination is an objective method for assessment of uterine scar defects. The present study was conducted to compare single-layer interrupted sutures (Group A) with double-layer interrupted sutures (Group B) and our new method (Group C) as well as other perioperative parameters in relation to risk of wedge defects in scars.
METHODS: We have introduced a new myometrium closure procedure consisting of continuous suture with decidual closure followed by interrupted myometrium suture. In this prospective study, women undergoing cesarean operation (n = 137) were examined by transvaginal ultrasound one month after surgery to assess the appearance of lower uterine scars. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associations of perioperative parameters and methods for lower myometrium closure with abnormal wedge formation.
RESULTS: Wedge defects were observed in a total of 27 patients (19.7%). The analysis revealed Groups B and C to have reduced risks with odds ratios of 0.28 and 0.077, respectively, as compared to Group A. Furthermore, increasing gestational week at delivery, plural fetal pregnancies, premature rupture of membranes and pre-eclampsia were also linked with an increased risk, with odds ratios of 1.4-8.9.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of uterine scar defects 1 month after cesarean sections varies with the method applied for myometrial suture and perioperative variables. The data suggest that methods for myometrium closure as well as other factors influence the condition of myometrial healing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16612704     DOI: 10.1080/00016340500430436

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  14 in total

Review 1.  Comparison between modified Misgav-Ladach and Pfannenstiel-Kerr techniques for Cesarean section: review of literature.

Authors:  Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Ilaria Marilli; Pietro Cignini; Francesco Padula; Laura D'Emidio; Lucia Mangiafico; Agnese Maria Chiara Rapisarda; Ferdinando Antonio Gulino; Stefano Cianci; Antonio Biondi; Claudio Giorlandino
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2014 Apr-Jun

2.  Previous prelabor or intrapartum cesarean delivery and risk of placenta previa.

Authors:  Katheryne L Downes; Stefanie N Hinkle; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Paul S Albert; Katherine L Grantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Techniques for caesarean section.

Authors:  G J Hofmeyr; M Mathai; A Shah; N Novikova
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2008-01-23

4.  Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section.

Authors:  Xingchen Zhou; Tao Zhang; Huayuan Qiao; Yi Zhang; Xipeng Wang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  The optimal uterine closure technique during cesarean.

Authors:  Emmanuel Bujold
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2012-08

6.  Successful treatment of atypical cesarean scar defect using endoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Hirotaka Masuda; Hiroshi Uchida; Tetsuo Maruyama; Kenji Sato; Suguru Sato; Mamoru Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Causes of an Increased Rate of Caesarean Section.

Authors:  Nenad Miseljic; Ejub Basic; Sanja Miseljic
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2018-12

8.  Cost-effectiveness of single-layer versus double-layer uterine closure during caesarean section on postmenstrual spotting: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sanne I Stegwee; Ângela J Ben; Mohamed El Alili; Lucet F van der Voet; Christianne J M de Groot; Judith E Bosmans; Judith A F Huirne
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Risk factors for Korean women to develop an isthmocele after a cesarean section.

Authors:  I Y Park; M R Kim; H N Lee; Y Gen; M J Kim
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Ultrasonographic criteria of cesarean scar defect evaluation.

Authors:  Andrzej Woźniak; Krzysztof Pyra; Hugo Rio Tinto; Sławomir Woźniak
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2018
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.