Literature DB >> 22733352

The current state of robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery.

Josh Winer1, Mehmet F Can, David L Bartlett, Herbert J Zeh, Amer H Zureikat.   

Abstract

Pancreatic surgery is challenging for both surgeon and patient. With the advent of minimally invasive surgical techniques, patient morbidity could be reduced. However, these techniques must conform to established principles of open pancreatic surgery with regards to meticulous dissection, haemostasis and oncologic results. The robotic platform is utilized in all facets of surgery, and is being increasingly applied in pancreatic surgery. As with the introduction of any new technology, this approach must undergo rigorous examination before widespread adoption of the technique. In this article, we review the techniques and outcomes of robotic-assisted pancreatic resections, focusing on robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy, robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy and robotic-assisted central pancreatectomy. As the outcomes of robotic-assisted surgery have yet to be rigorously evaluated against the gold standard of open surgery, this Review also highlights major laparoscopic pancreatic series in an effort to summarize the available literature on minimally invasive pancreatic surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22733352     DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1759-5045            Impact factor:   46.802


  53 in total

1.  Metaanalysis of trials comparing minimally invasive and open distal pancreatectomies.

Authors:  Giuseppe R Nigri; Alan S Rosman; Niccolò Petrucciani; Alessandro Fancellu; Michele Pisano; Luigi Zorcolo; Giovanni Ramacciato; Marcovalerio Melis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jordan M Winter; John L Cameron; Kurtis A Campbell; Meghan A Arnold; David C Chang; Joann Coleman; Mary B Hodgin; Patricia K Sauter; Ralph H Hruban; Taylor S Riall; Richard D Schulick; Michael A Choti; Keith D Lillemoe; Charles J Yeo
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  The laparoscopic duodenopancreatectomy: the posterior approach.

Authors:  Andrew A Gumbs; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Laparoscopic and robotic donor pancreatectomy for living donor pancreas and pancreas-kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Jose Oberholzer; Ivo Tzvetanov; Alessandra Mele; Enrico Benedetti
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 7.027

5.  A multicenter analysis of distal pancreatectomy for adenocarcinoma: is laparoscopic resection appropriate?

Authors:  David A Kooby; William G Hawkins; C Max Schmidt; Sharon M Weber; David J Bentrem; Theresa W Gillespie; Johnita Byrd Sellers; Nipun B Merchant; Charles R Scoggins; Robert C G Martin; Hong Jin Kim; Syed Ahmad; Clifford S Cho; Alexander A Parikh; Carrie K Chu; Nicholas A Hamilton; Courtney J Doyle; Scott Pinchot; Amanda Hayman; Rebecca McClaine; Attila Nakeeb; Charles A Staley; Kelly M McMasters; Keith D Lillemoe
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Initial experiences using robot-assisted central pancreatectomy with pancreaticogastrostomy: a potential way to advanced laparoscopic pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Chang Moo Kang; Dong Hyun Kim; Woo Jung Lee; Hoon Sang Chi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-09-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients.

Authors:  K D Lillemoe; S Kaushal; J L Cameron; T A Sohn; H A Pitt; C J Yeo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors.

Authors:  M Gagner; A Pomp; M F Herrera
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Fabio Sbrana; Francesco Maria Bianco; Enrique Fernando Elli; Galaxy Shah; Pietro Addeo; Giuseppe Caravaglios; Andrea Coratti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: role in 2014 and beyond.

Authors:  Erin H Baker; Samuel W Ross; Ramanathan Seshadri; Ryan Z Swan; David A Iannitti; Dionisios Vrochides; John B Martinie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-08

2.  Robotic learning of motion using demonstrations and statistical models for surgical simulation.

Authors:  Tao Yang; Chee Kong Chui; Jiang Liu; Weimin Huang; Yi Su; Stephen K Y Chang
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 3.  State of the art of robotic pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Luca Milone; Despoina Daskalaki; Xiaoying Wang; Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the presence of aberrant or anomalous hepatic arterial anatomy: safety and oncologic outcomes.

Authors:  Trang K Nguyen; Mazen S Zenati; Brian A Boone; Jennifer Steve; Melissa E Hogg; David L Bartlett; Herbert J Zeh; Amer H Zureikat
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  First experience with robotic pancreatoduodenectomy in Singapore.

Authors:  Tze-Yi Low; Ye-Xin Koh; Brian Kp Goh
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  250 robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility.

Authors:  Amer H Zureikat; A James Moser; Brian A Boone; David L Bartlett; Mazen Zenati; Herbert J Zeh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Minimally invasive pancreatectomy for cancer: a critical review of the current literature.

Authors:  Trenton L Place; Peter Nau; James J Mezhir
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Recent Trends.

Authors:  Georgios D Lianos; Dimitrios K Christodoulou; Konstantinos H Katsanos; Christos Katsios; Georgios K Glantzounis
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2017-06

9.  Robotic approach improves spleen-preserving rate and shortens postoperative hospital stay of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Shi Chen; Qian Zhan; Jiang-zhi Chen; Jia-bin Jin; Xia-xing Deng; Hao Chen; Bai-yong Shen; Cheng-hong Peng; Hong-wei Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Robotic central pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Ahmad Hamad; Stephanie Novak; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.