Corrado R Asteria1, Salvatore Pucciarelli2, Leonardo Gerard3, Nicola Mantovani4, Mauro Pagani5, Luigi Boccia3, Paolo Ricci6, Luigi Troiano4, Giuseppe Lucchini7, Coriolano Pulica3. 1. Department of Surgery and Orthopaedics, General Surgery Units of Asola, Mantua and Pieve C., Carlo Poma Hospital, 80° Fanteria Place, 1-46041, Asola, Mantua, Italy. corrado.asteria@libero.it. 2. Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology, Surgical Clinic I, School of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. 3. Department of Surgery and Orthopaedics, General Surgery Units of Asola, Mantua and Pieve C., Carlo Poma Hospital, 80° Fanteria Place, 1-46041, Asola, Mantua, Italy. 4. Department of Surgery and Orthopaedics, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Carlo Poma Hospital, Mantua, Italy. 5. Department of Medicine, Medicine Unit, Pieve Coriano, Carlo Poma Hospital Mantua, Mantua, Italy. 6. Epidemiological Observatory Local Health-care Authority (LHCA), Mantua, Italy. 7. Department of Healthcare Medical Management, Biostatistic Service, Carlo Poma Hospital, Mantua, Italy.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: High rates of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) are still diagnosed in the right side of the colon. This study aimed to investigate whether screening programs increase CRC detection and whether tumor location is associated with survival outcome. METHODS: Patients affected by CRC, aged from 50 to 69 years and operated on from 2005 to 2009 were reviewed. Other than patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors, detection mode and tumor location were recorded. Overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were investigated, using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Mean age of 386 patients included was 62.0 years, 59 % were males. CRC was detected by screening in 17 % of cases, and diagnosis was made from symptoms in 67 % and emergency surgery for 16 %. Screen-detected CRCs were located in the left colon (59 %), then in rectum (25 %) and in proximal colon (16 %) (p = 0.02). Most of CRC patients urgently operated on had cancer located in proximal colon (45 %), then in the left colon (36 %) and in rectum (18 %) (p = 0.001). Right-sided CRC demonstrated higher pTNM stage (p = 0.001), adequate harvest count nodes (p = 0.0001), metastatic nodes (p = 0.02), and poor differentiation grading (p = 0.0001). With multivariate analysis, poor differentiation grade was independently associated with both worse OS (HR 3.6, p = 0.05) and worse DFS (HR 8.1, p = 0.0001), while distant recurrence was associated with worse OS (HR 20.1, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Low rates of right-sided CRC are diagnosed following screening program. Proximal CRC demonstrates aggressive behavior without impact on outcome. These findings prompt concern about population awareness for CRC screening.
BACKGROUND: High rates of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) are still diagnosed in the right side of the colon. This study aimed to investigate whether screening programs increase CRC detection and whether tumor location is associated with survival outcome. METHODS:Patients affected by CRC, aged from 50 to 69 years and operated on from 2005 to 2009 were reviewed. Other than patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors, detection mode and tumor location were recorded. Overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were investigated, using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Mean age of 386 patients included was 62.0 years, 59 % were males. CRC was detected by screening in 17 % of cases, and diagnosis was made from symptoms in 67 % and emergency surgery for 16 %. Screen-detected CRCs were located in the left colon (59 %), then in rectum (25 %) and in proximal colon (16 %) (p = 0.02). Most of CRC patients urgently operated on had cancer located in proximal colon (45 %), then in the left colon (36 %) and in rectum (18 %) (p = 0.001). Right-sided CRC demonstrated higher pTNM stage (p = 0.001), adequate harvest count nodes (p = 0.0001), metastatic nodes (p = 0.02), and poor differentiation grading (p = 0.0001). With multivariate analysis, poor differentiation grade was independently associated with both worse OS (HR 3.6, p = 0.05) and worse DFS (HR 8.1, p = 0.0001), while distant recurrence was associated with worse OS (HR 20.1, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Low rates of right-sided CRC are diagnosed following screening program. Proximal CRC demonstrates aggressive behavior without impact on outcome. These findings prompt concern about population awareness for CRC screening.
Authors: Raquel E Davila; Elizabeth Rajan; Todd H Baron; Douglas G Adler; James V Egan; Douglas O Faigel; Seng-Ian Gan; William K Hirota; Jonathan A Leighton; David Lichtenstein; Waqar A Qureshi; Bo Shen; Marc J Zuckerman; Trina VanGuilder; Robert D Fanelli Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Luis Béjar; Miguel Gili; Verónica Díaz; Gloria Ramírez; Julio López; Juan L Cabanillas; Aurelio Cayuela Journal: Eur J Cancer Prev Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 2.497
Authors: Brenda K Edwards; Anne-Michelle Noone; Angela B Mariotto; Edgar P Simard; Francis P Boscoe; S Jane Henley; Ahmedin Jemal; Hyunsoon Cho; Robert N Anderson; Betsy A Kohler; Christie R Eheman; Elizabeth M Ward Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-12-16 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Cornelis J H van de Velde; Petra G Boelens; Josep M Borras; Jan-Willem Coebergh; Andres Cervantes; Lennart Blomqvist; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Colette B M van den Broek; Gina Brown; Eric Van Cutsem; Eloy Espin; Karin Haustermans; Bengt Glimelius; Lene H Iversen; J Han van Krieken; Corrie A M Marijnen; Geoffrey Henning; Jola Gore-Booth; Elisa Meldolesi; Pawel Mroczkowski; Iris Nagtegaal; Peter Naredi; Hector Ortiz; Lars Påhlman; Philip Quirke; Claus Rödel; Arnaud Roth; Harm Rutten; Hans J Schmoll; Jason J Smith; Pieter J Tanis; Claire Taylor; Arne Wibe; Theo Wiggers; Maria A Gambacorta; Cynthia Aristei; Vincenzo Valentini Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2013-10-31 Impact factor: 9.162