Literature DB >> 26234391

Clients' Perception of Outcome of Team-Based Prenatal and Reproductive Genetic Counseling in Serbian Service Using the Perceived Personal Control (PPC) Questionnaire.

Goran Cuturilo1,2, Olivera Kontic Vucinic3,4, Ivana Novakovic3,5, Svetlana Ignjatovic6, Marija Mijovic7, Nenad Sulovic4, Dusan Vukolic4, Milica Komnenic4, Jasmina Tadic4, Aleksandar Cetkovic4, Aleksandra Belic4, Aleksandar Ljubic3,4,8.   

Abstract

This is the first study in Serbia and the region of South-East Europe dedicated to clients' perception of outcome and efficiency of prenatal and reproductive genetic counseling. The primary aim of this study was to assess overall value and success of genetic counseling in prenatal and reproductive care with regard to perceived personal control of clients, reflecting also in a part patient comprehension, knowledge retention, and empowerment in decision-making. The standardized Perceived Personal Control questionnaire (PPC) was used for the assessment of 239 female participants. First, we performed a complete validation of the psychometric characteristics of the Serbian-language version of the PPC questionnaire. The validation of the questionnaire permits other researchers from Serbian-speaking regions of South-East Europe to use this standard instrument to assess the effectiveness of prenatal genetic counseling in their communities and analyze advantages and disadvantages of their counseling models. We also measured social and demographic characteristics of participants. Further, we analyzed effects of our team-based prenatal and reproductive genetic counseling model through (a) calculation of PPC scores at three different stages (before initial, after initial, and before second counseling session), and (b) by assessing participants' responses by indication for referral (advanced maternal age, abnormal biochemical screening, family history of hereditary disorders, maternal exposure to drugs, exposure to radiation, exposure to infective agents, infertility or recurrent abortions, and miscellaneous). The results indicate that participants' knowledge after initial counseling increased significantly and after that remained stable and sustainable. A satisfactory level of confidence among participants had been achieved, in that many felt an increased sense of control over their situation and emotional response to it. Indirectly, these results indicate the success of a team-based prenatal genetic counseling model, which has not been assessed in the literature to date.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Outcome; Perceived Personal Control (PPC); Prenatal genetic counseling; Questionnaire; Satisfaction; Serbia; South-East Europe; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26234391     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9857-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  14 in total

Review 1.  Research directions in genetic counselling: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A Pilnick; R Dingwall
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2001-08

2.  Empowerment: qualitative underpinning of a new clinical genetics-specific patient-reported outcome.

Authors:  Marion McAllister; Graham Dunn; Chris Todd
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Construct validity in psychological tests.

Authors:  L J CRONBACH; P E MEEHL
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1955-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Evaluating genetic counseling: client expectations, psychological adjustment and satisfaction with service.

Authors:  Angela Davey; Kristie Rostant; Karen Harrop; Jack Goldblatt; Peter O'Leary
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  The perceived personal control (PPC) questionnaire as an outcome of genetic counseling: reliability and validity of the instrument.

Authors:  Ellen M A Smets; Arwen H Pieterse; Cora M Aalfs; Margreet G E M Ausems; Alexandra M van Dulmen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-04-15       Impact factor: 2.802

6.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Psychological response to prenatal genetic counseling and amniocentesis.

Authors:  K P Tercyak; S B Johnson; S F Roberts; A C Cruz
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2001-04

8.  Perceptions of Latinas on the Traditional Prenatal Genetic Counseling Model.

Authors:  Stephanie Thompson; Sarah Jane Noblin; Jennifer Lemons; Susan K Peterson; Carlos Carreno; Andrea Harbison
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Prenatal genetic counseling in cross-cultural medicine: A framework for family physicians.

Authors:  Ashvinder K Bhogal; Fern Brunger
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 10.  Outcome measurement in clinical genetics services: a systematic review of validated measures.

Authors:  Katherine Payne; Stuart Nicholls; Marion McAllister; Rhona Macleod; Dian Donnai; Linda M Davies
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.