Fanny Le Du1, Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo2, Minjeong Park3, Diane D Liu3, Gabriel N Hortobagyi4, Naoto T Ueno5. 1. Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Medical Oncology, Eugène Marquis Cancer Center, Rennes, France. 2. Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 3. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 4. Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 5. Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: nueno@mdanderson.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recurrence score (RS) derived from a 21-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay is used to stratify patients with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-normal breast cancer into 3 groups on the basis of 10-year distant metastasis risk: low, intermediate, and high. Published data are limited regarding the effect of RS on choice of adjuvant therapy for T1 breast cancer. We investigated the relationship between RS and choice of adjuvant therapy, prognosis, and benefit of chemotherapy (CT) in stage I breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 1030 patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-normal stage I breast cancer and RS available. RSs were correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment, and outcome. RESULTS: Patients with pathologic (p)T1a, pT1b, and pT1c disease did not differ in distribution of low, intermediate, and high RS (P = .673). Overall, fewer than 10% of patients had a high RS. Histologic grade 1, nuclear grade 1, and low Ki-67 expression had only 1%, 0%, and 6% of high RSs, respectively. Among patients with intermediate RSs, 41% with pT1b and 46% with pT1c disease received CT. Among patients with intermediate RSs, for pT1b disease, distant disease-free survival (DDFS) did not differ between hormonal therapy (HT) alone and CT with HT (P = .752); for pT1c, DDFS was superior for CT with HT (P = .020). Histologic grade was the only independent prognostic factor of DDFS (P = .0007, 1 vs. 3; P = .035, 2 vs. 3); RS did not predict DDFS (P = .083, high vs. low; P = .066, intermediate vs. low). CONCLUSION: The added value of RS to known prognostic factors appears limited to patients with pT1b breast cancer. However, this study lacked long-term follow-up.
BACKGROUND: Recurrence score (RS) derived from a 21-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay is used to stratify patients with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-normal breast cancer into 3 groups on the basis of 10-year distant metastasis risk: low, intermediate, and high. Published data are limited regarding the effect of RS on choice of adjuvant therapy for T1 breast cancer. We investigated the relationship between RS and choice of adjuvant therapy, prognosis, and benefit of chemotherapy (CT) in stage I breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 1030 patients with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-normal stage I breast cancer and RS available. RSs were correlated with clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment, and outcome. RESULTS:Patients with pathologic (p)T1a, pT1b, and pT1c disease did not differ in distribution of low, intermediate, and high RS (P = .673). Overall, fewer than 10% of patients had a high RS. Histologic grade 1, nuclear grade 1, and low Ki-67 expression had only 1%, 0%, and 6% of high RSs, respectively. Among patients with intermediate RSs, 41% with pT1b and 46% with pT1c disease received CT. Among patients with intermediate RSs, for pT1b disease, distant disease-free survival (DDFS) did not differ between hormonal therapy (HT) alone and CT with HT (P = .752); for pT1c, DDFS was superior for CT with HT (P = .020). Histologic grade was the only independent prognostic factor of DDFS (P = .0007, 1 vs. 3; P = .035, 2 vs. 3); RS did not predict DDFS (P = .083, high vs. low; P = .066, intermediate vs. low). CONCLUSION: The added value of RS to known prognostic factors appears limited to patients with pT1b breast cancer. However, this study lacked long-term follow-up.
Authors: Soonmyung Paik; Gong Tang; Steven Shak; Chungyeul Kim; Joffre Baker; Wanseop Kim; Maureen Cronin; Frederick L Baehner; Drew Watson; John Bryant; Joseph P Costantino; Charles E Geyer; D Lawrence Wickerham; Norman Wolmark Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-05-23 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: J Albanell; A González; M Ruiz-Borrego; E Alba; J A García-Saenz; J M Corominas; O Burgues; V Furio; A Rojo; J Palacios; B Bermejo; M Martínez-García; M L Limon; A S Muñoz; M Martín; I Tusquets; F Rojo; R Colomer; I Faull; A Lluch Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-06-06 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: D B Geffen; S Abu-Ghanem; N Sion-Vardy; R Braunstein; M Tokar; S Ariad; B Delgado; M Bayme; M Koretz Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Lyndsay Harris; Herbert Fritsche; Robert Mennel; Larry Norton; Peter Ravdin; Sheila Taube; Mark R Somerfield; Daniel F Hayes; Robert C Bast Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-10-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Shelly S Lo; Patricia B Mumby; John Norton; Karen Rychlik; Jeffrey Smerage; Joseph Kash; Helen K Chew; Ellen R Gaynor; Daniel F Hayes; Andrew Epstein; Kathy S Albain Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laurel A Habel; Steven Shak; Marlena K Jacobs; Angela Capra; Claire Alexander; Mylan Pho; Joffre Baker; Michael Walker; Drew Watson; James Hackett; Noelle T Blick; Deborah Greenberg; Louis Fehrenbacher; Bryan Langholz; Charles P Quesenberry Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2006-05-31 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: E de Azambuja; F Cardoso; G de Castro; M Colozza; M S Mano; V Durbecq; C Sotiriou; D Larsimont; M J Piccart-Gebhart; M Paesmans Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2007-04-24 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: A Goldhirsch; E P Winer; A S Coates; R D Gelber; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2013-08-04 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Marie Alexandre; Aurélie Maran-Gonzalez; Marie Viala; Nelly Firmin; Véronique D'Hondt; Marian Gutowski; Céline Bourgier; William Jacot; Séverine Guiu Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2019-12-11 Impact factor: 3.989