BACKGROUND: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay has been validated in retrospective studies as prognostic of distant disease recurrence and predictive of the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer (BC). There is limited published data on the impact of the assay on clinical practice, particularly in the context of a single practice with a unified treatment policy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, RS was obtained on 135 patients in a single practice with a uniform treatment policy. Treatment recommendations before and after RS result were analyzed retrospectively. Pre-RS treatment recommendations were based on clinicopathological features and Adjuvant! Online (AO) calculated survival advantage. RS and AO survival advantage for adding chemotherapy were compared for each patient. RESULTS: The distribution by risk group of RS was low- 49.6%, intermediate-37.8%, and high-12.6%. In 34 patients (25.2%, 95% confidence interval 17.9% to 32.5%), recommendation for chemotherapy was changed after obtaining assay result. Most changes (70.6%) were from chemotherapy to no chemotherapy. The RS correlated poorly with AO predictions. CONCLUSION: The 21-gene assay, when applied in a consistent manner in early-stage BC, changes treatment recommendations in one-quarter of patients tested.
BACKGROUND: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay has been validated in retrospective studies as prognostic of distant disease recurrence and predictive of the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer (BC). There is limited published data on the impact of the assay on clinical practice, particularly in the context of a single practice with a unified treatment policy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, RS was obtained on 135 patients in a single practice with a uniform treatment policy. Treatment recommendations before and after RS result were analyzed retrospectively. Pre-RS treatment recommendations were based on clinicopathological features and Adjuvant! Online (AO) calculated survival advantage. RS and AO survival advantage for adding chemotherapy were compared for each patient. RESULTS: The distribution by risk group of RS was low- 49.6%, intermediate-37.8%, and high-12.6%. In 34 patients (25.2%, 95% confidence interval 17.9% to 32.5%), recommendation for chemotherapy was changed after obtaining assay result. Most changes (70.6%) were from chemotherapy to no chemotherapy. The RS correlated poorly with AO predictions. CONCLUSION: The 21-gene assay, when applied in a consistent manner in early-stage BC, changes treatment recommendations in one-quarter of patients tested.
Authors: Gulisa Turashvili; Joanne F Chou; Edi Brogi; Monica Morrow; Maura Dickler; Larry Norton; Clifford Hudis; Hannah Y Wen Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2017-07-12 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Paul Gaß; Peter A Fasching; Tanja Fehm; Johann de Waal; Mahdi Rezai; Bernd Baier; Gerold Baake; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Martin Guggenberger; Mathias Warm; Nadia Harbeck; Rachel Wuerstlein; Jörg-Uwe Deuker; Peter Dall; Barbara Richter; Grischa Wachsmann; Cosima Brucker; Jan W Siebers; Nikos Fersis; Thomas Kuhn; Christopher Wolf; Hans-Walter Vollert; Georg-Peter Breitbach; Wolfgang Janni; Robert Landthaler; Andreas Kohls; Daniela Rezek; Thomas Noesselt; Gunnar Fischer; Stephan Henschen; Thomas Praetz; Volker Heyl; Thorsten Kühn; Thomas Krauss; Christoph Thomssen; Andre Hohn; Hans Tesch; Christoph Mundhenke; Alexander Hein; Claudia Rauh; Christian M Bayer; Adib Jacob; Katja Schmidt; Erik Belleville; Peyman Hadji; Sara Y Brucker; Matthias W Beckmann; Diethelm Wallwiener; Sherko Kümmel; Christian R Löhberg Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: K Willemsma; W Yip; N LeVasseur; K Dobosz; C Illmann; S Baxter; C Lohrisch; C E Simmons Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Filipa Lynce; Kristi D Graves; Lina Jandorf; Charite Ricker; Eida Castro; Laura Moreno; Bianca Augusto; Laura Fejerman; Susan T Vadaparampil Journal: Cancer Control Date: 2016-10 Impact factor: 3.302
Authors: Hannah Y Wen; Melissa Krystel-Whittemore; Sujata Patil; Fresia Pareja; Zenica L Bowser; Maura N Dickler; Larry Norton; Monica Morrow; Clifford A Hudis; Edi Brogi Journal: Cancer Date: 2016-08-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Galia Jacobson-Raber; Irena Lazarev; Victor Novack; Willmosh Mermershtein; Yael Baumfeld; David B Geffen; Netta Sion-Vardy; Samuel Ariad Journal: Oncol Lett Date: 2011-08-24 Impact factor: 2.967