Literature DB >> 18258979

Development of the 21-gene assay and its application in clinical practice and clinical trials.

Joseph A Sparano1, Soonmyung Paik.   

Abstract

Several multigene markers that predict relapse more accurately than classical clinicopathologic features have been developed. The 21-gene assay was developed specifically for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer, and has been shown to predict distant recurrence more accurately that classical clinicopathologic features in patients with ER-positive breast cancer and negative axillary nodes treated with adjuvant tamoxifen; validation studies in this population led to its approval as a diagnostic test. In a similar population, it also may be used to assess the benefit of adding chemotherapy to hormonal therapy. Other validation studies indicate that it also predicts the risk of distant and local recurrence in other populations with ER-positive disease, including node-negative patients receiving no adjuvant therapy and patients with positive axillary nodes treated with doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy. The Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment (TAILORx) is multicenter trial that integrates the 21-gene assay into the clinical decision-making process and is designed to refine the utility of the assay in clinical practice and to provide a resource for evaluating additional molecular markers as they are developed in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18258979     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  199 in total

Review 1.  Practical implications of gene-expression-based assays for breast oncologists.

Authors:  Aleix Prat; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Improving validation practices in "omics" research.

Authors:  John P A Ioannidis; Muin J Khoury
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Predicting the response to preoperative radiation or chemoradiation by a microarray analysis of the gene expression profiles in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Takashi Kobunai; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-06-16       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Gene-expression profiling in breast cancer: bespoke cancer therapy or more fiction than science?

Authors:  M Barry; M R Kell
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 1.568

Review 5.  Gene expression-based prognostic signatures in lung cancer: ready for clinical use?

Authors:  Jyothi Subramanian; Richard Simon
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Surgical oncology: why biopsying metastatic breast cancer should be routine.

Authors:  Anand Sharma; Tim Crook; Alastair Thompson; Carlo Palmieri
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  Node-Negative Breast Cancer: Which Patients Should Be Treated?

Authors:  Marcus Schmidt
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  Why does Oncotype DX recurrence score reduce adjuvant chemotherapy use?

Authors:  Jeffrey G Schneider; Danny N Khalil
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Multigene Assays for Classification, Prognosis, and Prediction in Breast Cancer: a Critical Review on the Background and Clinical Utility.

Authors:  P Sinn; S Aulmann; R Wirtz; S Schott; F Marmé; Z Varga; A Lebeau; H Kreipe; A Schneeweiss
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

10.  Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment for breast cancer: from bedside to bench and back again?

Authors:  R R Saleh; N Bouganim; J Hilton; A Arnaout; M Clemons
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.