Alexander M Grant1, Craig S Levin2. 1. Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 and Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305. 2. Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305; and Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The large number of detector channels in modern positron emission tomography (PET) scanners poses a challenge in terms of readout electronics complexity. Multiplexing schemes are typically implemented to reduce the number of physical readout channels, but often result in performance degradation. Novel methods of multiplexing in PET must be developed to avoid this data degradation. The preservation of fast timing information is especially important for time-of-flight PET. METHODS: A new multiplexing scheme based on encoding detector interaction events with a series of extremely fast overlapping optical pulses with precise delays is demonstrated in this work. Encoding events in this way potentially allows many detector channels to be simultaneously encoded onto a single optical fiber that is then read out by a single digitizer. A two channel silicon photomultiplier-based prototype utilizing this optical delay encoding technique along with dual threshold time-over-threshold is demonstrated. RESULTS: The optical encoding and multiplexing prototype achieves a coincidence time resolution of 160 ps full width at half maximum (FWHM) and an energy resolution of 13.1% FWHM at 511 keV with 3 × 3 × 5 mm(3) LYSO crystals. All interaction information for both detectors, including timing, energy, and channel identification, is encoded onto a single optical fiber with little degradation. CONCLUSIONS: Optical delay encoding and multiplexing technology could lead to time-of-flight PET scanners with fewer readout channels and simplified data acquisition systems.
PURPOSE: The large number of detector channels in modern positron emission tomography (PET) scanners poses a challenge in terms of readout electronics complexity. Multiplexing schemes are typically implemented to reduce the number of physical readout channels, but often result in performance degradation. Novel methods of multiplexing in PET must be developed to avoid this data degradation. The preservation of fast timing information is especially important for time-of-flight PET. METHODS: A new multiplexing scheme based on encoding detector interaction events with a series of extremely fast overlapping optical pulses with precise delays is demonstrated in this work. Encoding events in this way potentially allows many detector channels to be simultaneously encoded onto a single optical fiber that is then read out by a single digitizer. A two channel silicon photomultiplier-based prototype utilizing this optical delay encoding technique along with dual threshold time-over-threshold is demonstrated. RESULTS: The optical encoding and multiplexing prototype achieves a coincidence time resolution of 160 ps full width at half maximum (FWHM) and an energy resolution of 13.1% FWHM at 511 keV with 3 × 3 × 5 mm(3) LYSO crystals. All interaction information for both detectors, including timing, energy, and channel identification, is encoded onto a single optical fiber with little degradation. CONCLUSIONS: Optical delay encoding and multiplexing technology could lead to time-of-flight PET scanners with fewer readout channels and simplified data acquisition systems.
Authors: Peter Olcott; Ealgoo Kim; Keyjo Hong; Brian J Lee; Alexander M Grant; Chen-Ming Chang; Gary Glover; Craig S Levin Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Paul D Reynolds; Peter D Olcott; Guillem Pratx; Frances W Y Lau; Craig S Levin Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-09-27 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Yijie Huo; Sunil Sandhu; Jun Pan; Norbert Stuhrmann; Michelle L Povinelli; Joseph M Kahn; James S Harris; Martin M Fejer; Shanhui Fan Journal: Opt Lett Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 3.776
Authors: Bjoern Weissler; Pierre Gebhardt; Peter M Dueppenbecker; Jakob Wehner; David Schug; Christoph W Lerche; Benjamin Goldschmidt; Andre Salomon; Iris Verel; Edwin Heijman; Michael Perkuhn; Dirk Heberling; Rene M Botnar; Fabian Kiessling; Volkmar Schulz Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Frances W Y Lau; Arne Vandenbroucke; Paul D Reynolds; Peter D Olcott; Mark A Horowitz; Craig S Levin Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2010-11-16 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Jakob Wehner; Bjoern Weissler; Peter Dueppenbecker; Pierre Gebhardt; David Schug; Walter Ruetten; Fabian Kiessling; Volkmar Schulz Journal: Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A Date: 2014-01-11 Impact factor: 1.455