Literature DB >> 2622646

Criteria for decompensation in binocular vision.

T C Jenkins1, L D Pickwell, A A Yekta.   

Abstract

Two groups of patients, one under 40 years of age and the other 40 years and over, were divided into subgroups according to whether they had symptoms associated with near vision. A method developed in 'signal detection theory' was used to determine whether a value could be found for heterophoria, or associated heterophoria, which would predict which patients had symptoms due to decompensated heterophoria in normal routine investigation. Receiver operator characteristic curves (ROC curves) were constructed to look for these cut-off values between patients with, and without, symptoms. No value for dissociated heterophoria was found that would discriminate between the symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. It is concluded that heterophoria measurement is not useful as a routine procedure. In the case of associated heterophoria, for the under 40 years age group, patients with a value of 1 prism dioptre or more are more likely to have symptoms than not, and one-third of patients with close work problems have a value of 2 prism dioptres or more. It was rare to find any asymptomatic patient with a value as high as this. In the 40 years and over age group those with an associated heterophoria of 2 prism dioptres or more are more likely to have symptoms than not. One-third of patients in the latter age group, with symptoms, have a value of 3 prism dioptres or more whilst it is rare to find an asymptomatic patient with a value as large as this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2622646     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.1989.tb00830.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  12 in total

1.  Presbyopia among normal individuals.

Authors:  Abraham Spierer; Benjamin Shalev
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  The magnitude of foveal suppression during fixation disparity in presbyopic patients.

Authors:  Faudziah Abd-Manan; Tca Jenkins; Na Kaye
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2003-07

3.  Effects of Prism Eyeglasses on Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity.

Authors:  Volkhard Schroth; Roland Joos; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of aligning prisms on the objective and subjective fixation disparity in far distance.

Authors:  Volkhard Schroth; Roland Joos; Ewald Alshuth; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 0.957

7.  The repeatability and reproducibility of four techniques for measuring horizontal heterophoria: Implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Nicola S Anstice; Bianca Davidson; Bridget Field; Joyce Mathan; Andrew V Collins; Joanna M Black
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2020-08-12

8.  Is the aligning prism measured with the Mallett unit correlated with fusional vergence reserves?

Authors:  Miriam L Conway; Jennifer Thomas; Ahalya Subramanian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Do dissociated or associated phoria predict the comfortable prism?

Authors:  Joanna M N Otto; Miriam Kromeier; Michael Bach; Guntram Kommerell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?

Authors:  Ketan R Parmar; Christine Dickinson; Bruce J W Evans
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2019-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.