Literature DB >> 33828739

Effects of aligning prisms on the objective and subjective fixation disparity in far distance.

Volkhard Schroth1, Roland Joos1, Ewald Alshuth2, Wolfgang Jaschinski3.   

Abstract

Fixation disparity (FD) refers to a suboptimal condition of binocular vision. The oculomotor aspect of FD refers to a misadjustment in the vergence angle between the two visual axes that is measured in research with eye trackers (objective fixation disparity, oFD). The sensory aspect is psychophysically tested using dichoptic nonius lines (subjective fixation disparity, sFD). Some optometrists use nonius tests to determine the prisms for constant wear aiming to align the eyes. However, they do not (yet) use eye trackers. We investigate the effect of aligning prisms on oFD and sFD for 60 sec exposure duration of prisms determined with the clinically established Cross test in far distance vision. Without prisms, both types of FD were correlated with the aligning prism, while with prisms the FD was close to zero (these analyses included all base-in and base-out cases). The effect of base-in prisms on oFD was proportional to the amount of the aligning prism for the present 60 sec exposure, similar as for the 2- 5 sec exposure in Schmid et al. (2018). Thus, within 1 minute of prism exposure, no substantial vergence adaptation seems to occur in the present test conditions. Further studies may investigate intra-individual responses to different exposure times of aligning prisms in both prism directions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross test; Eye tracking; MCH-procedure; aligning prism; fixation disparity; vergence

Year:  2019        PMID: 33828739      PMCID: PMC7880133          DOI: 10.16910/jemr.12.4.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eye Mov Res        ISSN: 1995-8692            Impact factor:   0.957


  39 in total

1.  Vergence adaptation in clinical vergence testing.

Authors:  Catherine McDaniel; Nick Fogt
Journal:  Optometry       Date:  2010-07-23

Review 2.  Stability of retinal correspondence in normal binocular vision.

Authors:  B Wick
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Comparison of fixation disparities obtained by objective and subjective methods.

Authors:  N Fogt; R Jones
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Repeatability of Associated Phoria Tests.

Authors:  Mosaad Alhassan; Jeffery K Hovis; Ralph B Chou
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Near heterophoria in early childhood.

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; Vidhyapriya Sreenivasan; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Effect of reading in low illumination on fixation disparity.

Authors:  L D Pickwell; A A Yekta; T C Jenkins
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1987-07

7.  Comparison of simultaneously obtained objective and subjective measurements of fixation disparity.

Authors:  A E Kertesz; H J Lee
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1987-10

Review 8.  Vergence adaptation: a review.

Authors:  B Sethi
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-09-30       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  Parameters of fixation disparity.

Authors:  D B Carter
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1980-09

Review 10.  Clinical implications of vergence adaptation.

Authors:  J Cooper
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.