Literature DB >> 23386797

The magnitude of foveal suppression during fixation disparity in presbyopic patients.

Faudziah Abd-Manan1, Tca Jenkins, Na Kaye.   

Abstract

The characteristics of foveal suppression (FS) in fixation disparity (FD) due to visual stress were investigated and their relationship's between, age, symptoms, and the effect of temporary elimination of FD using prisms on the degree of the FS were analysed. Forty-five presbyopic subjects (15 without FD and 30 with stress related FD) participated in the study. The subjects underwent comprehensive optometric examination prior to the study. Their FS and FD were measured. The FD was later corrected with ophthalmic prisms, the power of which was equally divided between the eyes, and the FS was later verified. Age and FS had no significant correlation for subjects without FD (Spearman's rs = 0.17, p = 0.55, NS) and in subjects with FD (rs = 2.49, p = 0.19, NS), respectively. Correlation between the degree of FS and FD was weak (rs=0.38, p=0.07), however the magnitude of FD significantly increased with age (r=0.27, p=0.04). Subjects with FD had significantly larger degree of FS compared with subjects without FD (Wilcoxon's Z =-0.25, p=0.01). There was no significant difference in the magnitudes of FD (t = -0.38, p=0.07) and in their degrees of FS (Mann-Whitney U = 1.5, p=0.71) between subjects with and without symptoms. Correcting the FD with prisms generally reduced the degree of FS (Wilcoxon's Z =1.96, p=0.04), however, significant change in FS only occured in subjects with symptoms (Z=-1.97, p=0.03), but was not significant in subjects without symptoms (Z=-0.70, p=0.48).

Entities:  

Keywords:  fixation disparity; foveal suppression; prism correction; symptoms

Year:  2003        PMID: 23386797      PMCID: PMC3561887     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malays J Med Sci        ISSN: 1394-195X


  19 in total

1.  Suppression theory of binocular vision.

Authors:  H ASHER
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1953-01       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Binocular rivalry suppression: insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change.

Authors:  R Blake; R Fox
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Decrease in stereoacuity in the seventh decade of life.

Authors:  B Brown; M K Yap; W C Fan
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Effect of fixation disparity on distance binocular visual acuity.

Authors:  T C Jenkins; F Abd-Manan; S Pardhan; R N Murgatroyd
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Actual measurement of fixation disparity and its use in diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  J E Sheedy
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1980-12

6.  The suppression effect of simulated anisometropia.

Authors:  T Simpson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Criteria for decompensation in binocular vision.

Authors:  T C Jenkins; L D Pickwell; A A Yekta
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Binocular vision, age and symptoms.

Authors:  A A Yekta; L D Pickwell; T C Jenkins
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Fixation of disparity: a steady state error of disparity-induced vergence.

Authors:  C Schor
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1980-09

10.  Visual symptoms and reading performance.

Authors:  J D Grisham; M M Sheppard; W U Tran
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.