Literature DB >> 23073026

Face aftereffects predict individual differences in face recognition ability.

Hugh W Dennett1, Elinor McKone, Mark Edwards, Tirta Susilo.   

Abstract

Face aftereffects are widely studied on the assumption that they provide a useful tool for investigating face-space coding of identity. However, a long-standing issue concerns the extent to which face aftereffects originate in face-level processes as opposed to earlier stages of visual processing. For example, some recent studies failed to find atypical face aftereffects in individuals with clinically poor face recognition. We show that in individuals within the normal range of face recognition abilities, there is an association between face memory ability and a figural face aftereffect that is argued to reflect the steepness of broadband-opponent neural response functions in underlying face-space. We further show that this correlation arises from face-level processing, by reporting results of tests of nonface memory and nonface aftereffects. We conclude that face aftereffects can tap high-level face-space, and that face-space coding differs in quality between individuals and contributes to face recognition ability.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23073026     DOI: 10.1177/0956797612446350

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  17 in total

1.  About-face on face recognition ability and holistic processing.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; R Jackie Floyd; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Experience moderates overlap between object and face recognition, suggesting a common ability.

Authors:  Isabel Gauthier; Rankin W McGugin; Jennifer J Richler; Grit Herzmann; Magen Speegle; Ana E Van Gulick
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Face Processing Systems: From Neurons to Real-World Social Perception.

Authors:  Winrich Freiwald; Bradley Duchaine; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  When Intuition Fails to Align with Data: A Reply to.

Authors:  Jennifer J Richler; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2013-05-10

5.  The effects of body exposure on self-body image and esthetic appreciation in anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  Valentina Cazzato; Emanuel Mian; Sonia Mele; Giulia Tognana; Patrizia Todisco; Cosimo Urgesi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Atypicalities in perceptual adaptation in autism do not extend to perceptual causality.

Authors:  Themelis Karaminis; Marco Turi; Louise Neil; Nicholas A Badcock; David Burr; Elizabeth Pellicano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Exemplar variance supports robust learning of facial identity.

Authors:  Jennifer Murphy; Alberta Ipser; Sebastian B Gaigg; Richard Cook
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  New tests to measure individual differences in matching and labelling facial expressions of emotion, and their association with ability to recognise vocal emotions and facial identity.

Authors:  Romina Palermo; Kirsty B O'Connor; Joshua M Davis; Jessica Irons; Elinor McKone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Evolving concepts of sensory adaptation.

Authors:  Michael A Webster
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2012-11-01

10.  A robust method of measuring other-race and other-ethnicity effects: the Cambridge Face Memory Test format.

Authors:  Elinor McKone; Sacha Stokes; Jia Liu; Sarah Cohan; Chiara Fiorentini; Madeleine Pidcock; Galit Yovel; Mary Broughton; Michel Pelleg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.