Literature DB >> 26221419

Draft genomic sequence of a selenite-reducing bacterium, Paenirhodobacter enshiensis DW2-9(T).

Dan Wang1, Fengqiu Zhu1, Xiaoli Zhu1, Shixue Zheng1, Rui Wang2, Gejiao Wang1.   

Abstract

Paenirhodobacter enshiensis is a non-photosynthetic species that belongs to family Rhodobacteraceae. Here we report the draft genome sequence of Paenirhodobacter enshiensis DW2-9(T) and comparison results to the available related genomes. The strain has a 3.4 Mbp genome sequence with G + C content of 66.82 % and 2781 protein-coding genes. It lacks photosynthetic gene clusters and putative proteins necessary in Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) pathway, but contains proteins in Entner-Doudoroff (ED) pathway instead. It shares 699 common genes with nine related Rhodobacteraceae genomes, and possesses 315 specific genes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative genomics; Genome sequence; Paenirhodobacter enshiensis; Rhodobacteraceae; Selenite-reducing bacterium

Year:  2015        PMID: 26221419      PMCID: PMC4517658          DOI: 10.1186/s40793-015-0026-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stand Genomic Sci        ISSN: 1944-3277


Introduction

Family belongs to which was established by Garrity et al. [1] and contains 105 genera including both chemoorganotrophic and photoheterotrophic bacteria. The type genus was which was first proposed by Imhoff et al. in 1984 [2] and comprised of only photosynthetic species [3-8]. In 2013, we proposed DW2-9T to represent one of the non-photosynthetic genera of [9]. The main differences between and its closest relative are their photosynthetic characteristics and major polar lipid types [9]. is another non-photosynthetic genus of [10] and the main difference between and is the cultivation condition [9-11]. So far, the genus contains only one species, . The main characters of DW2-9T are non-photosynthetic and possessing phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine and aminophospholipid as the major polar lipids [9]. In addition, we found that strain DW2-9T was able to reduce soluble selenite (Se4+) into insoluble elemental selenium nanoparticle (Se0). Since Se0 is less bioavailable, this strain could potentially been used in bioremediation of soil or water with selenite-contamination. In order to provide genomic information for elucidating the mechanism of bacterial selenite reduction, as well as the taxonomic study, we performed genome sequencing of strain DW2-9T, together with its close relatives CCUG 52307T [10] and CCUG 47968T [11]. In this study, we report the genomic features of DW2-9T and the comparison results to the close relatives. This microorganism is not belonged to a larger genomic survey project.

Organism information

Classification and features

Strain DW2-9T was isolated from soil near a sewage outlet of the Bafeng pharmaceutical factory, Enshi city, Hubei province, PR China. The general features of DW2-9T are shown in Table 1. The 16S rRNA gene based phylogenetic tree showing the phylogenetic relationships of DW2-9T to other taxonomically classified type strains of the family could be found in our previous study [9].
Table 1

Classification and general features of P. enshiensis DW2-9T [12]

MIGS IDPropertyTermEvidence codea
ClassificationDomain Bacteria TAS [13]
Phylum Proteobacteria TAS [14]
Class Alphaproteobacteria TAS [15]
Order Rhodobacterales TAS [16]
Family Rhodobacteraceae TAS [1, 17]
Genus Paenirhodobacter TAS [9]
Species Paenirhodobacter enshiensis TAS [9]
Type strain DW2-9T (Accession #JN797511)
Gram stainnegativeTAS [9]
Cell shaperodTAS [9]
Motilitynon-motileTAS [9]
Sporulationnon-sporulatingNAS
Temperature range4-42 °CTAS [9]
Optimum temperature28 °CTAS [9]
pH range; Optimum5–8; 7TAS [9]
Carbon sourceaetate, propionate, pyruvate, fumarate, malate, citrate, succinate, D-glucose, D-fructose, D-xylose and maltoseTAS [9]
MIGS-6HabitatsoilTAS [9]
MIGS-6.3Salinity0- 3 % NaCl (w/v), optimal at 0 %TAS [9]
MIGS-22Oxygen requirementfacultatively anaerobicTAS [9]
MIGS-15Biotic relationshipfree-livingTAS [9]
MIGS-14Pathogenicitynon-pathogenNAS
MIGS-4Geographic locationEnshi city, Hubei province, P. R. ChinaTAS [9]
MIGS-5Sample collection2010TAS [9]
MIGS-4.1Latitude29°52′55′′ NTAS [9]
MIGS-4.2Longitude110°03′21′′ E
MIGS-4.4Altitudenot reported

aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [18]

Classification and general features of P. enshiensis DW2-9T [12] aEvidence codes - IDA: Inferred from Direct Assay; TAS: Traceable Author Statement (i.e., a direct report exists in the literature); NAS: Non-traceable Author Statement (i.e., not directly observed for the living, isolated sample, but based on a generally accepted property for the species, or anecdotal evidence). These evidence codes are from the Gene Ontology project [18] Strain DW2-9T is Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, non-motile, non-photosynthetic, and rod-shaped (Fig. 1). Cells are 0.9-1.2 μm long and 0.3-0.6 μm wide. Colonies are convex, circular, smooth and white after 2 days of incubation on modified Biebl & Pfennig’s agar at 30 °C [9]. The strain was able to reduce 0.2 mmol/L of sodium selenite (Na2SeO3) into Se0 within 2 days when grown in Luria-Bertani medium.
Fig. 1

A TEM image of ultrathin sections for P. enshiensis DW2-9T cells. The scale bar represents 200 nm

A TEM image of ultrathin sections for P. enshiensis DW2-9T cells. The scale bar represents 200 nm The chemotaxonomic features include phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine and aminophospholipid as the major polar lipids, ubiquinone-10 as the major quinone and C16:0, C18:1ω7c, C19:0 cyclo ω8c and summed feature 3 (one or more of iso-C15:0 2-OH, C16:1ω6c and C16:1ω7c) as the major cellular fatty acids of [9].

Genome sequencing information

Genome project history

Strain DW2-9T was sequenced by Majorbio Bio-pharm Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China. The draft genome sequence of strain DW2-9T has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under accession number JFZB00000000. The version described in this study is the first version JFZB01000000 and consists of sequences JFZB01000001-JFZB01000112. The project information are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Project information

MIGS IDPropertyTerm
MIGS-31Finishing qualityHigh-quality draft
MIGS-28Libraries usedIllumina Paired-End library (300 bp insert size)
MIGS-29Sequencing platformsIllumina Miseq 2000
MIGS-31.2Fold coverage222 ×
MIGS-30AssemblersSOAPdenovo v1.05
MIGS-32Gene calling methodGeneMarkS+
Locus TAGCG50
Genbank IDJFZB00000000
Genbank Date of ReleaseAugust 17, 2014
GOLD IDGi0077179
BioprojectPRJNA239787
MIGS-13Source material identifierDW2-9T
Project relevanceGenome comparison
Project information

Growth conditions and genomic DNA preparation

Strain DW2-9T was grown aerobically in LB medium at 28°C for 36 h. The DNA was extracted, concentrated and purified using the QiAamp kit according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Qiagen, Germany).

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genome of DW2-9T was sequenced by Illumina technology [19]. An Illumina standard shotgun library was constructed and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq 2000 platform, which generated 3,128,974 reads totaling 941.8 Mbp. All original sequence data can be found at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive [20]. The following steps were performed for removing low quality reads: (1) removed the adapter in the reads, (2) cut the 5’ end bases which were not A, T, G, C, (3) filtered the reads which have a quality score lower than 20, (4) filtered the reads which contained N more than 10 percent, (5) removed the reads which have the length less than 25 bp after processed by the previous four steps. The processed reads were assembled by SOAPdenovo v1.05 [21]. The final draft assembly contained 153 contigs in 85 scaffolds. The total size of the genome is 3.4 Mbp and the final assembly is based on 764.6 Mbp of Illumina data, which provides an average 222× coverage of the genome. The simulated genome of DW2-9T is a set of contigs ordered against the complete genome of SB1003 (NC_013034) using Mauve software [22].

Genome annotation

The draft genome of DW2-9T was annotated through the RAST server version 2.0 [23] and the National Center for Biotechnology Information Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline, which combines the gene caller GeneMarkS+ [18] with the similarity-based gene detection approach. Protein function classification was performed by WebMGA [24] with E-value cutoff 1-e10. The transmembrane helices were predicted by TMHMM Server v. 2.0 [25]. Internal gene clustering was performed by OrthoMCL using Match cutoff of 50 % and E-value Exponent cutoff of 1-e5 [26, 27]. Signal peptides in the genome were predicted by SignalP 3.0 server [28]. The translation predicted CDSs were also used to search against the Pfam protein family database [29], KEGG [30] and the NCBI Conserved Domain Database through the Batch web CD-Search tool [31].

Genome properties

The whole genome of P. enshiensis DW2-9T is 3,439,591 bp in length, with an average GC content of 66.82 %, and is distributed in 112 contigs (>200 bp). The genome properties and statistics are summarized in Table 3 and Fig. 2. A total of 2781 protein-coding genes are identified and 78.99 % of them are distributed into COG functional categories (Table 4).
Table 3

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome

AttributeGenome (total)
Value% of totala
Genome size (bp)3,439,591100
DNA coding (bp)2,662,80677.41
DNA G + C (bp)2,298,40466.82
Total genesb 2856
RNA genes56
Pseudo genes19
Protein-coding genes2781100
Genes in internal clusters115641.57
Genes with function prediction206174.11
Genes assigned to COGs219678.99
Genes with Pfam domains249589.74
Genes with signal peptides71725.79
Genes with transmembrane helices58821.15
CRISPR repeats3

aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

bAlso includes 19 pseudogenes, 10 RNA genes, 45 rRNAs and 1 ncRNA

Fig. 2

A graphical circular map of the genome performed with CGview comparison tool [32]. From outside to center, ring 1, 4 show protein-coding genes colored by COG categories on forward/reverse strand; ring 2, 3 denote genes on forward/reverse strand; ring 5 shows G + C% content plot, and the innermost ring shows GC skew

Table 4

Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories

CodeValue% of totala Description
J1545.54Translation
A00.00RNA processing and modification
K1374.93Transcription
L933.34Replication, recombination and repair
B10.04Chromatin structure and dynamics
D250.89Cell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis
Y00.00Nuclear structure
V361.29Defense mechanisms
T832.98Signal transduction mechanisms
M1244.46Cell wall/membrane biogenesis
N291.04Cell motility
Z00.00Cytoskeleton
W00.00Extracellular structures
U531.91Intracellular trafficking and secretion
O923.31Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones
C1555.57Energy production and conversion
G973.49Carbohydrate transport and metabolism
E38513.84Amino acid transport and metabolism
F782.80Nucleotide transport and metabolism
H1164.17Coenzyme transport and metabolism
I843.02Lipid transport and metabolism
P1625.83Inorganic ion transport and metabolism
Q511.83Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism
R2639.46General function prediction only
S1866.69Function unknown
-58521.01Not in COGs

aThe total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Nucleotide content and gene count levels of the genome aThe total is based on either the size of the genome in base pairs or the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome bAlso includes 19 pseudogenes, 10 RNA genes, 45 rRNAs and 1 ncRNA A graphical circular map of the genome performed with CGview comparison tool [32]. From outside to center, ring 1, 4 show protein-coding genes colored by COG categories on forward/reverse strand; ring 2, 3 denote genes on forward/reverse strand; ring 5 shows G + C% content plot, and the innermost ring shows GC skew A phylogenetic tree highlighting the phylogenetic position of P. enshiensis DW2-9T. The conserved protein was analyzed by OrthoMCL with Match Cutoff 50 % and E-value Exponent Cutoff 1-e5 [26, 27]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the 699 single-copy conserved proteins shared among the ten genomes. The phylogenies were inferred by MEGA 5.05 with NJ algorithm [38], and 1000 bootstrap repetitions were computed to estimate the reliability of the trees. The genome accession numbers of the strains are shown in parenthesis Ortholog analysis of P. enshiensis DW2-9T and nine Rhodobacteraceae genomes conducted using OrthoMCL with Match cutoff of 50 % and E-value Exponent cutoff of 1-e5. The total numbers of shared proteins of the ten genomes were tabulated and presented as a Venn diagram. Abbreviations for strain names: DW, P. enshiensis DW2-9T; CCUG1, Haematobacter missouriensis CCUG 52307T; CCUG2, Haematobacter massiliensis CCUG 47968T; RC, Rhodobacter capsulatus SB1003; RS, Rhodobacter sphaeroides ATH 2.4.1T; PA, Paracoccus aminophilus JCM 7686T; PD, Paracoccus denitrificans PD1222T; RD, Roseobacter denitrificans OCh 114; RL, Roseobacter litoralis Och 149T; RP, Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3T A graphical circular map of the comparison between reference strain Rhodobacter capsulatus SB 1003 and the three strains sequenced in this study. From outside to center, rings 1, 4 show protein-coding genes colored by COG categories on forward/reverse strand; rings 2, 3 denote genes on forward/reverse strand; rings 5, 6, 7 show the CDS vs CDS BLAST results of Rhodobacter capsulatus SB 1003 with P. enshiensis DW2-9T, H. massiliensis CCUG 47968T and H. missouriensis CCUG 52307T, respectively; ring 8 shows G + C% content plot, and the innermost ring shows GC skew Number of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories aThe total is based on the total number of protein coding genes in the annotated genome

Insights from the genome sequence

Profiles of metabolic network and pathway

Strain DW2-9T is facultatively anaerobic and can utilize a variety of sole carbon substrates, including acetate, propionate, pyruvate, fumarate, malate, citrate, succinate, D-glucose, D-fructose and maltose [9]. Genome analysis showed that this strain has the corresponding enzymes to utilize these sole carbon sources and to catabolize them via different pathways (mainly by the TCA cycle and pentose phosphate). Especially in glycolysis, strain DW2-9T lacks the key enzyme 6-phosphofructokinase that is essential in Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas (EMP) pathway. Instead, it contains 6-phosphogluconate dehydratase (KFI24690) and 2-keto-3-deoxyphosphogluconate aldolase (KFI24689) that were characterized in Entner-Doudoroff (ED) pathway. All key genes necessary for fatty acid biosynthesis are present. All genes required for de novo synthesis of 15 common amino acids are present. Genes for biosynthesis of Ala, Asn, Met, Tyr and His are not present. As a non-photosynthetic bacterium, the known photosynthetic gene clusters, including the bch genes, puf genes and crt genes were not found in the genome of DW2-9T. In this study, strain DW2-9T was found to be capable of reducing selenite into selenium nanoparticle. It has been reported that low-molecular weight thiols such as glutathione [33] and cysteine [34], nitrite reductase [35], fumarate reductase [36], glutathione reductase and thioredoxin reductase [37] could reduce selenite into elemental selenium. In the genome of strain DW2-9T, all the encoding genes of the respective enzymes mentioned above were found (e.g. KFI26491, KFI30857, KFI28250, KFI28810, KFI29698, KFI24274 and KFI29723).

Comparisons with other Rhodobacteraceae genomes

The genomic sequence of strain DW2-9T was compared to nine available strains ( CCUG 52307T, CCUG 47968T, SB1003, ATH 2.4.1T, JCM 7686T, PD1222, DSS-3T, OCh 114T and Och 149T). OrthoMCL was used again to perform ortholog clustering analysis with Match cutoff of 50% and E-value Exponent cutoff of 1-e5 [26, 27]. A total of 699 shared protein sequences were obtained and a neighbor-jointing (NJ) phylogenomic tree [38] was constructed (Fig. 3). The phylogenomic result based on the 699 proteins is generally consistent with the 16S rRNA gene tree [9]. The ortholog clustering analysis also revealed that strain DW2-9T has 315 strain-specific genes, which potentially contributes to genus-specific features distinguishing Paenirhodobacter from other genera (Fig. 4).
Fig. 3

A phylogenetic tree highlighting the phylogenetic position of P. enshiensis DW2-9T. The conserved protein was analyzed by OrthoMCL with Match Cutoff 50 % and E-value Exponent Cutoff 1-e5 [26, 27]. The phylogenetic tree was constructed based on the 699 single-copy conserved proteins shared among the ten genomes. The phylogenies were inferred by MEGA 5.05 with NJ algorithm [38], and 1000 bootstrap repetitions were computed to estimate the reliability of the trees. The genome accession numbers of the strains are shown in parenthesis

Fig. 4

Ortholog analysis of P. enshiensis DW2-9T and nine Rhodobacteraceae genomes conducted using OrthoMCL with Match cutoff of 50 % and E-value Exponent cutoff of 1-e5. The total numbers of shared proteins of the ten genomes were tabulated and presented as a Venn diagram. Abbreviations for strain names: DW, P. enshiensis DW2-9T; CCUG1, Haematobacter missouriensis CCUG 52307T; CCUG2, Haematobacter massiliensis CCUG 47968T; RC, Rhodobacter capsulatus SB1003; RS, Rhodobacter sphaeroides ATH 2.4.1T; PA, Paracoccus aminophilus JCM 7686T; PD, Paracoccus denitrificans PD1222T; RD, Roseobacter denitrificans OCh 114; RL, Roseobacter litoralis Och 149T; RP, Ruegeria pomeroyi DSS-3T

In this study, we also sequenced the genomes of two members of genus, strain CCUG 52307T [10] and CCUG 47968T [11]. The draft genome sequences were 3.9 and 4.1 Mbp, the G+C contents were 64.31 % and 64.56 %, and the numbers of predicted protein-coding genes were 3,612 and 3,806, respectively. Figure 5 shows the genome comparison results of strain DW2-9T, CCUG 52307T and CCUG 47968T using CGview comparison tool [32]. Table 5 presents the difference of the gene number (in percentage) in each COG category between strain DW2-9T, CCUG 52307T and CCUG 47968T.
Fig. 5

A graphical circular map of the comparison between reference strain Rhodobacter capsulatus SB 1003 and the three strains sequenced in this study. From outside to center, rings 1, 4 show protein-coding genes colored by COG categories on forward/reverse strand; rings 2, 3 denote genes on forward/reverse strand; rings 5, 6, 7 show the CDS vs CDS BLAST results of Rhodobacter capsulatus SB 1003 with P. enshiensis DW2-9T, H. massiliensis CCUG 47968T and H. missouriensis CCUG 52307T, respectively; ring 8 shows G + C% content plot, and the innermost ring shows GC skew

Table 5

Percentage of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories for P. enshiensis DW2-9T, H. missouriensis CCUG 52307T and H. massiliensis CCUG 47968T

CodeCOG description P. enshiensis DW2-9T H. missouriensis CCUG 52307T H. massiliensis CCUG 47968T
JTranslation5.544.264.23
ARNA processing and modification0.000.000.00
KTranscription4.934.824.99
LReplication, recombination and repair3.343.273.28
BChromatin structure and dynamics0.040.030.00
DCell cycle control, mitosis and meiosis0.890.970.92
YNuclear structure0.000.000.00
VDefense mechanisms1.291.110.89
TSignal transduction mechanisms2.982.192.57
MCell wall/membrane biogenesis4.463.713.76
NCell motility1.040.690.58
ZCytoskeleton0.000.000.00
WExtracellular structures0.000.000.00
UIntracellular trafficking and secretion1.912.051.45
OPosttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones3.313.163.10
CEnergy production and conversion5.575.205.10
GCarbohydrate transport and metabolism3.493.823.60
EAmino acid transport and metabolism13.8410.9611.09
FNucleotide transport and metabolism2.802.252.29
HCoenzyme transport and metabolism4.173.633.47
ILipid transport and metabolism3.024.434.60
PInorganic ion transport and metabolism5.836.177.12
QSecondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism1.832.712.52
RGeneral function prediction only9.469.639.77
SFunction unknown6.696.847.02
-Not in COGs21.0118.1117.66
Percentage of genes associated with the 25 general COG functional categories for P. enshiensis DW2-9T, H. missouriensis CCUG 52307T and H. massiliensis CCUG 47968T

Conclusions

Genomic analysis of DW2-9T revealed a high degree of consistency between genotypes and phenotypes, especially in sole carbon source utilization and non-photosynthetic nature. Genome sequencing of strain DW2-9T provides extra supports for its taxonomic classification. The genome sequence of strain DW2-9T also provides insights to better understand the molecular mechanisms of selenite reduction. In addition, this strain could potentially been used for bioremediation of environmental selenite-contamination. The associated MIGS records are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1.
  28 in total

1.  Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes.

Authors:  A Krogh; B Larsson; G von Heijne; E L Sonnhammer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-01-19       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Improved prediction of signal peptides: SignalP 3.0.

Authors:  Jannick Dyrløv Bendtsen; Henrik Nielsen; Gunnar von Heijne; Søren Brunak
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07-16       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Daniel Peterson; Nicholas Peterson; Glen Stecher; Masatoshi Nei; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  Pseudomonas seleniipraecipitans proteins potentially involved in selenite reduction.

Authors:  William J Hunter
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Rhodobacter massiliensis sp. nov., a new amoebae-resistant species isolated from the nose of a patient.

Authors:  Gilbert Greub; Didier Raoult
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.992

7.  OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Li Li; Christian J Stoeckert; David S Roos
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

Authors:  Dawn Field; George Garrity; Tanya Gray; Norman Morrison; Jeremy Selengut; Peter Sterk; Tatiana Tatusova; Nicholas Thomson; Michael J Allen; Samuel V Angiuoli; Michael Ashburner; Nelson Axelrod; Sandra Baldauf; Stuart Ballard; Jeffrey Boore; Guy Cochrane; James Cole; Peter Dawyndt; Paul De Vos; Claude DePamphilis; Robert Edwards; Nadeem Faruque; Robert Feldman; Jack Gilbert; Paul Gilna; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Philip Goldstein; Robert Guralnick; Dan Haft; David Hancock; Henning Hermjakob; Christiane Hertz-Fowler; Phil Hugenholtz; Ian Joint; Leonid Kagan; Matthew Kane; Jessie Kennedy; George Kowalchuk; Renzo Kottmann; Eugene Kolker; Saul Kravitz; Nikos Kyrpides; Jim Leebens-Mack; Suzanna E Lewis; Kelvin Li; Allyson L Lister; Phillip Lord; Natalia Maltsev; Victor Markowitz; Jennifer Martiny; Barbara Methe; Ilene Mizrachi; Richard Moxon; Karen Nelson; Julian Parkhill; Lita Proctor; Owen White; Susanna-Assunta Sansone; Andrew Spiers; Robert Stevens; Paul Swift; Chris Taylor; Yoshio Tateno; Adrian Tett; Sarah Turner; David Ussery; Bob Vaughan; Naomi Ward; Trish Whetzel; Ingio San Gil; Gareth Wilson; Anil Wipat
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 54.908

9.  Comparing thousands of circular genomes using the CGView Comparison Tool.

Authors:  Jason R Grant; Adriano S Arantes; Paul Stothard
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST).

Authors:  Ross Overbeek; Robert Olson; Gordon D Pusch; Gary J Olsen; James J Davis; Terry Disz; Robert A Edwards; Svetlana Gerdes; Bruce Parrello; Maulik Shukla; Veronika Vonstein; Alice R Wattam; Fangfang Xia; Rick Stevens
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.